Social Security Reform a Potential Minefield for 2016 GOP Contenders

The disability fund is set to start running out of money right around the presidential election. So what will Republican candidates do about it?

Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Rand Paul, R-Ky.
National Journal
Dylan Scott
April 9, 2015, 4 p.m.

Next week, New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie plans to un­veil a com­pre­hens­ive en­ti­tle­ment re­form plan, ex­plain­ing how he would im­prove So­cial Se­cur­ity. De­pend­ing on what the next year holds for the pro­gram, the rest of the 2016 Re­pub­lic­an field might quickly need to join him.

It could make for some stark di­vid­ing lines dur­ing the primary sea­son and po­ten­tially make Re­pub­lic­ans vul­ner­able to the Demo­crat­ic at­tack lines that play to seni­ors’ fears about their pro­pos­als. Con­ser­vat­ives who re­mem­ber the fail­ure of George W. Bush’s 2005 ef­fort to par­tially privat­ize So­cial Se­cur­ity know how polit­ic­ally ex­plos­ive the is­sue can quickly be­come.

The prob­lem: So­cial Se­cur­ity’s dis­ab­il­ity fund is set to start run­ning out of money in late 2016, which would re­quire a 20 per­cent cut in be­ne­fits, a loom­ing cliff that Re­pub­lic­ans have poin­ted to as evid­ence of the pro­gram’s un­cer­tain solvency. The House passed a rule in Janu­ary that would block trans­fer­ring rev­en­ue from the re­tire­ment fund to the dis­ab­il­ity fund to pre­vent the cuts, as has been done in the past and Demo­crats want to do, un­less Con­gress ap­proves oth­er changes that would im­prove So­cial Se­cur­ity’s fin­ances in the long term.

Con­ser­vat­ive wonks would like con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans to use the op­por­tun­ity to go big on So­cial Se­cur­ity re­form, though they are skep­tic­al that they will and think they could skirt the House rule with min­im­al changes. Either way, the four Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors ex­pec­ted to make pres­id­en­tial bids likely have a So­cial Se­cur­ity vote up­com­ing.

Re­gard­less of how Con­gress acts, the dis­ab­il­ity cliff brings the re­tire­ment pro­gram to the fore­front of the 2016 policy land­scape. Whomever is elec­ted in 2016 could be in of­fice in­to 2025—less than 10 years be­fore the 2033 dead­line by which So­cial Se­cur­ity as a whole is ex­pec­ted to be un­able to pay full be­ne­fits.

“Whatever Con­gress de­cides to do will likely be in­suf­fi­cient in ad­dress­ing the real drivers of grow­ing spend­ing of the re­tire­ment and dis­ab­il­ity pro­gram,” Rom­ina Boc­cia, a re­search fel­low at the Her­it­age Found­a­tion, said. “I think that any pres­id­en­tial con­tender will be faced with the need to ad­dress with grow­ing en­ti­tle­ment spend­ing.”

Sen. Ted Cruz called Bush’s ap­proach “the right thing to do” in a Thursday in­ter­view with CN­BC. He said his own three-point plan would in­clude: no changes for cur­rent en­rollees, ty­ing be­ne­fits to in­fla­tion, and per­son­al ac­counts, de­rided as “privat­iz­a­tion” by op­pon­ents who say it would change the guar­an­teed-be­ne­fit nature of the pro­gram.

“Now, I also think you’ve got to give George W. Bush some real cred­it—he showed re­mark­able cour­age in the be­gin­ning of the second term tak­ing on So­cial Se­cur­ity re­form and per­son­al ac­counts,” Cruz said. “It was the right thing to do. Sadly, con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans ran to the hills and aban­doned him.”

Sen. Marco Ru­bio, sched­uled to an­nounce his pres­id­en­tial bid Monday in Miami, ad­voc­ated for rais­ing the re­tire­ment age for young­er work­ers and in­tro­du­cing more means-test­ing to the pro­gram in a policy plan re­leased in Feb­ru­ary.

Sen. Rand Paul’s 2016 cam­paign web­site says he also would sup­port those pro­pos­als—but is si­lent on private ac­counts, the pre­ferred rem­edy for many liber­tari­an groups like the Cato In­sti­tute.

A re­cent dus­tup for Paul un­der­lines the risk for Re­pub­lic­ans as they talk about So­cial Se­cur­ity. He was caught on tape in Janu­ary by the lib­er­al Amer­ic­an Bridge group’s track­ers say­ing that “over half of the people on dis­ab­il­ity are either anxious or their back hurts.”

“Join the club,” he quipped.

Demo­crats and me­dia fact-check­ers pounced—”False,” de­clared Poli­ti­Fact —and Paul’s team was soon scram­bling to cla­ri­fy the com­ment.

How big of a role So­cial Se­cur­ity plays for Re­pub­lic­ans in 2016 will de­pend on how—and wheth­er—their Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues in Con­gress ad­dress it in these few months be­fore the cam­paign is in full swing.

Con­gress has in­tro­duced pro­pos­als to sat­is­fy the House rule and avoid the cliff: Reps. Paul Ry­an and Sam John­son, along with Sen. Or­rin Hatch, in­tro­duced a bill to pro­hib­it re­ceiv­ing un­em­ploy­ment and dis­ab­il­ity be­ne­fits at the same time.

But some con­ser­vat­ives think that even if a smal­ler plan like that were ap­proved, So­cial Se­cur­ity should still be near the top of the list for White House as­pir­ants.

“It de­pends on wheth­er or not the Con­gress can pass any­thing in 2015 that avoids the 2016 in­solv­ency date. If yes, then that takes the pres­sure off the pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates in 2016,” said Jason Ficht­ner, a seni­or fel­low at the con­ser­vat­ive Mer­catus Cen­ter at George Ma­son Uni­versity, which re­ceives fund­ing from the in­flu­en­tial Koch broth­ers. “But if not, then yes, the pres­sure to put out a ‘solu­tion’ to the SSDI fin­an­cial short­fall will have to be on the pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates’ agenda and talk­ing points. And that would also lead to them hav­ing at least some ‘plan’ for So­cial Se­cur­ity re­form.”

What We're Following See More »
Bloomberg to Endorse Clinton This Week
1 hours ago

Michael Bloomberg will endorse Hillary Clinton this week in a prime-time speech. "The news is an unexpected move from Mr. Bloomberg, who has not been a member of the Democratic Party since 2000; was elected the mayor of New York City as a Republican; and later became an independent. But it reflects Mr. Bloomberg’s increasing dismay about the rise of Donald J. Trump and a determination to see that the Republican nominee is defeated."

Democrats Vote Major Changes to Superdelegate System
1 hours ago

"The Democratic Rules Committee voted overwhelmingly in favor of a major shift in the superdelegate system Saturday night after a deal was reached between" the Clinton and Sanders camps. "The committee approved nearly unanimously an amendment that preserves the existing superdelegate role for elected U.S. lawmakers and governors, but will bind the remaining superdelegates — roughly two-thirds — to primary and caucus results."

Wasserman Schultz to Resign at Week’s End
10 hours ago

"After hours of private talks," Debbie Wasserman Schultz agreed to step down as chair of the Democratic National Committee after the convention ends. In the wake of the convention intrigue, Hillary Clinton announced she's making Wasserman Schultz "the honorary chair of her campaign's 50-state program."

Wasserman Schultz Stripped of Convention Duties
19 hours ago

Democratic National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz "will not have a major speaking role or preside over daily convention proceedings this week," and is under increasing pressure to resign. The DNC Rules Committee on Saturday named Ohio Democratic Rep. Marcia Fudge as "permanent chair of the convention." At issue: internal DNC emails leaked by Wikileaks that show how "the DNC favored Clinton during the primary and tried to take down Bernie Sanders by questioning his religion."

New Round of Polls Show a Tight Race
3 days ago
  • A Rasmussen Reports poll shows Donald Trump ahead of Hillary Clinton, 43%-42%, the fourth week in a row he's led the poll (one of the few poll in which he's led consistently of late).
  • A Reuters/Ipsos survey shows Clinton leading 40%-36%. In a four-way race, she maintains her four-point lead, 39%-35%, with Gary Johnson and Jill Stein pulling 7% and 3%, respectively.
  • And the LA Times/USC daily tracking poll shows a dead heat, with Trump ahead by about half a percentage point.