From Right-Wing to RINO In Iowa GOP

For the first contest of 2016, the Republican Party has moved to the right of Pat Robertson’s guy.

National Journal
April 16, 2015, 1 a.m.

DES MOINES—With a fork and a frown, Steve Scheffler chops his scrambled eggs into a flattened yellow mash. “Some people don’t think I’m conservative enough,” he scoffs. “That’s laughable.”

Scheffler, 67, is an icon of Iowa evangelical conservatism: lead organizer for preacher Pat Robertson’s 1988 Iowa caucus campaign, former head of Iowa’s Christian Coalition, president of the Faith & Freedom Coalition, a man who believes in gay-conversion therapy, and who once warned that same-sex marriage would make Des Moines “the homosexual capital of the Midwest.”

While the years have not softened Scheffler’s conservatism, Iowa’s GOP has moved so far to the right that he’s now considered in legion with the party’s establishment-evangelical wing. His rivals to the right, the purists, called Scheffler a RINO—or “Republican in name only.”

“It hurts,” he winces. I strain to hear Scheffler’s angry growl; his fork clangs against a breakfast plate loud enough to startle a lady in the next booth. “Politics isn’t about perfection. These guys with their holier-than-thou attitudes: You can’t get anything done that way.”

(RELATED: Reporters Outnumber Voters as Hillary Clinton Opens Campaign in Iowa)

Before I left for Iowa to preview the fledgling GOP presidential race, somebody had asked me, “How conservative is the party in Iowa?” The answer came to me in a Des Moines diner: The Iowa GOP is so conservative that Steve Scheffler looks relatively — it’s hard for me to even write this — moderate.

It’s a fact not lost on the large field of Republican presidential hopefuls who are making their initial rounds of Iowa, where the 2016 elections will begin. Their staff notices, too.

“The place is crazy conservative,” said a senior adviser to a top-tier presidential candidate trying to figure out how to succeed in Iowa without hurting his national image.

Last week, I watched four candidates try to strike that balance at a gathering of homeschool advocates, a knot of mothers and fathers with outsized power inside Iowa’s caucuses. Former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania went first, reminding the crowd that he narrowly won the 2012 race in Iowa. He portrayed himself as the field’s foreign-policy expert, urging Iowans to be cautious of any candidate whose “experience with national security is a briefing book before a debate.”

(RELATED: Marco Rubio Sees a Chance to Compete In the D.C. Primary)

Next came Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who cast himself as the outsider. “We don’t just need a Republican in Washington,” he said. “We need a conservative in the White House who will make big changes.”

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, who won the 2008 caucuses as a conservative populist, claimed to be the champion of “people who dust the dirt off their clothes” after work.

The last speaker was the most polished. “I’m running for president because our country is in crisis,” Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas said. It was a provocatively abrupt opening to a speech that cast the next election as an existential choice between good (unyielding conservatism) and evil (everything else).

“We need a leader who can stand up and smile and defend” conservative values, he said.

Cruz is a force in Iowa, according to more than a dozen state GOP activists who talked to me last week, because he is the only candidate so far who has coupled an appeal to conservative purists (the type who call Scheffler a RINO) with the ability to raise enough money to defeat GOP establishment candidates.

(RELATED: Chris Christie: “The Game Hasn’t Even Come Close to Beginning”)

If Cruz is the candidate of potential, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker may be in the best shape right now. While striking some as lacking gravitas in private meetings, Walker has impressed other Iowa Republicans with a union-fighting record that suggests he is a conservative who can get things done. Walker’s massive state headquarters suggests he’s taking Iowa seriously, and activists appreciate that.

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul hopes to retain most of the people who supported his father, Rep. Ron Paul, and expand on those numbers. But his allies who took over the Iowa GOP after the 2012 elections did a lousy job and angered many.

Huckabee and Santorum suffer from the retread syndrome: Once a candidate wins Iowa and loses the nomination, Iowa caucus-goers doubt their viability.

Jindal has the opposite problem: Few Iowans know him. But activists who’ve watched the Louisiana governor campaign in Iowa say he has the capacity to grow.

Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida is better known than Jindal and a far superior retail politician, but he doesn’t have much of a team in Iowa.

Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry seems to have convinced the state’s political class that his embarrassing performance in 2012 was due to a bad back and pain medication. “He’s a different candidate,” said Tyler Dehaan, the 32-year-old chairman of the Dallas County GOP, “a much better candidate.”

Perry has a strong Iowa team, as does New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a relatively moderate establishment candidate.

Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina has told activists he can build a coalition that includes 10,000 veterans and reservists plus 6,000 establishment voters. That is a stretch.

Jeb Bush campaigned for his brother and father in Iowa and yet, according to a top adviser, “This is not his natural hunting ground.” He may work to keep expectations low in Iowa, with an eye toward the more moderate GOP electorate in New Hampshire. Considered one of the nation’s most conservative and successful governors from 1999 to 2007, the Floridian has watched his party zip to his right.

In other words, Bush is the field’s Steve Scheffler.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login