The Great Fracking Slowdown and Its Aftermath

North Dakota’s oil boom transformed the state. Then the money stopped flowing. What happens now?

Ethan Epstein
Add to Briefcase
Ethan Epstein
April 17, 2015, 1:01 a.m.

Five years ago, Darick Fran­zen began to hear amaz­ing tales of lim­it­less op­por­tun­it­ies in west­ern North Dakota. A big man with a boom­ing voice, a friendly smile, and a pen­chant for salty lan­guage (“Sorry,” he says after one out­burst, “I’m a little blunt be­cause I’ve been in con­struc­tion all my life”), the fath­er of two was liv­ing with his fam­ily in the Chica­go sub­urbs, work­ing for a road-build­ing com­pany. Busi­ness was chron­ic­ally slow, thanks to Illinois’ an­em­ic eco­nomy. “We had sev­er­al busi­ness part­ners,” he re­calls, “that were say­ing, ‘Hey, you need to get out [to North Dakota]. You need to get out there.‘“Š”

North Dakota had just be­gun to emerge as a ver­it­able Saudi Ar­a­bia of the Great Plains. Hy­draul­ic-frac­tur­ing tech­no­logy—bet­ter known as “frack­ing”—had opened up ex­ploit­a­tion of the vast Bakken (rhymes with “talkin‘“Š”) Shale form­a­tion, a 200,000-square-mile rock form­a­tion, filled with oil, that spans parts of Montana, Saskat­chewan, Man­itoba, and west­ern North Dakota. Soon the state would sur­pass Alaska to be­come the na­tion’s num­ber-two oil pro­du­cer, trail­ing only Texas. (If it were a coun­try, North Dakota would now be 19th world­wide in oil pro­duc­tion, tied with Colom­bia.) It helped that, un­like the sludgy stuff pro­duced in oth­er parts of the coun­try, Bakken oil is pure li­quid, re­quir­ing less re­fine­ment. One North Dakotan com­pares its con­sist­ency to di­luted Coca-Cola. It has a dis­tinctly sweet odor. “We say it smells like money,” says Ron Ness, pres­id­ent of the North Dakota Pet­ro­leum Coun­cil.

North Dakota’s em­brace of frack­ing spurred a re­mark­able eco­nom­ic and demo­graph­ic re­sur­gence, es­pe­cially for a state whose pop­u­la­tion had been aging and de­clin­ing since the 1930s. “We spent dec­ades try­ing to fig­ure out what we were go­ing to do to sur­vive,” Ness says, hold­ing up a piece of Bakken Shale. “We found that in this rock.” With oil prices sky high from 2009 to 2014, North Dakota had the coun­try’s fast­est rates of pop­u­la­tion and GDP growth, and, ul­ti­mately, its low­est un­em­ploy­ment rate. Na­tion­al me­dia touted giddy stor­ies of blue-col­lar oil work­ers without high school dip­lo­mas bring­ing in north of $100,000 a year, and of North Dakota Wal­marts of­fer­ing start­ing wages of $17 an hour. The latest Amer­ic­an gold rush was on.

(RE­LATED: How Wash­ing­ton De­railed Amtrak)

In early 2011, Fran­zen heeded the call. Leav­ing his fam­ily be­hind, he wound up in what looked like the middle of nowhere: re­mote, windswept Wat­ford City, some 135 miles north­w­est of Bis­mar­ck. His­tor­ic­ally an ag­ri­cul­tur­al com­munity, cul­tiv­at­ing wheat and cattle, Wat­ford City’s pop­u­la­tion had peaked at around 2,100 in 1980; since then, it had been slowly, stead­ily shrink­ing. Now, thanks to its stra­tegic loc­a­tion at the heart of the Bakken’s oil re­serves, it was not just the fast­est-grow­ing city in North Dakota. Ac­cord­ing to the gov­ernor’s of­fice, it had be­come the fast­est-grow­ing mu­ni­cip­al­ity in the world.

“It was crazy here,” Fran­zen says. Nobody knows for sure how many people had found their way to Wat­ford City—es­tim­ates are in the 15,000 range—but the formerly sleepy little town was strain­ing at the seams when Fran­zen ar­rived. There wer­en’t enough gro­cery stores to meet de­mand; there wasn’t enough of any­thing, really, ex­cept for oil. “People, hous­ing, equip­ment parts: You name it, we couldn’t get it,” Fran­zen says. “Milk!” He still re­mem­bers when, two years ago, he was plan­ning to grill out and real­ized: “Shit, my pro­pane bottle is empty.” He drove in­to Wat­ford City, and: “There was no pro­pane. Are you freak­ing kid­ding me? I just want to grill a bur­ger!”

Des­pite the in­con­veni­ences, it was a ter­rif­ic place for Fran­zen to make some money, thanks to the res­id­en­tial and com­mer­cial build­ings that were go­ing up as fast as they could be built. He signed on with a res­id­en­tial-de­vel­op­ment com­pany and, after the ini­tial cul­ture shock, began to take to Wat­ford City and its “won­der­ful people.” He’s now pres­id­ent of the loc­al Cham­ber of Com­merce. The sep­ar­a­tion from his fam­ily hasn’t been easy. “My wife comes out every oth­er month,” he says. “I try to get home every three to four weeks.” But then again, he says with a laugh, “I’m 51 and my son is 24. My daugh­ter is 21. They’re kind of the age that they don’t really care where I am.”

Al­most overnight, Wat­ford City be­came the world’s fast­est-grow­ing mu­ni­cip­al­ity. (AP Photo/Martha Irvine)

Fran­zen now lives in a tidy ranch house in a new de­vel­op­ment—so new, in fact, that I al­most couldn’t find it when I went to in­ter­view him. When I in­put Fran­zen’s ad­dress in­to my smart­phone to call up dir­ec­tions, it claimed that no such ad­dress ex­is­ted. It turns out, the en­tire neigh­bor­hood didn’t ex­ist two years ago, and the map apps haven’t caught up. “I could drag you around for hours and show you things that wer­en’t here six months ago, one year ago, and two years ago,” Fran­zen told me after I’d tracked him down. “It’s amaz­ing.”

(RE­LATED: The BP Deep­wa­ter Ho­ri­zon Oil Spill In Pho­tos)

But en­ergy booms don’t last forever. Last sum­mer, those high oil prices began to drop—and just kept drop­ping. A con­flu­ence of factors was to blame, in­clud­ing slow­ing Chinese de­mand and heavy pro­duc­tion in the real Saudi Ar­a­bia. By this spring, the cost of a bar­rel of oil had plummeted by 60 per­cent. Pro­duc­tion in North Dakota had fallen apace, leav­ing both long­time res­id­ents and the new­comers who moved here to make a quick buck in a kind of limbo—wait­ing to see wheth­er, and when, prices will rise again. It’s been a hard les­son in the eco­nom­ic real­it­ies of a nat­ur­al-re­source eco­nomy, show­ing just how be­hold­en North Dakota—like oth­er re­gions of the coun­try that have em­braced frack­ing, such as west­ern Pennsylvania and Texas—has be­come to glob­al geo­pol­it­ic­al cur­rents that it can’t con­trol.

Like too many of our polit­ic­al de­bates, the ar­gu­ment over frack­ing has been de­press­ingly simplist­ic and re­duct­ive. On the one hand, we are told, the tech­no­logy her­alds an un­al­loyed eco­nom­ic boon: It showers riches on the com­munit­ies where vast en­ergy de­pos­its have long lain un­tapped, and it helps to re­duce Amer­ica’s de­pend­ence on for­eign oil. Op­pos­i­tion to frack­ing, mean­while, has ten­ded to fo­cus ex­clus­ively on en­vir­on­ment­al ar­gu­ments: It may be prof­it­able, but it’s not worth the eco­lo­gic­al costs, such as pol­luted ground­wa­ter from the meth­ane gas that’s re­leased in the drilling pro­cess.

But the story un­fold­ing in west­ern North Dakota shows that weigh­ing costs and be­ne­fits is far more com­plic­ated than that. While the short-term eco­nom­ic up­side of frack­ing is un­deni­able, there are so­cial costs that aren’t of­ten dis­cussed, even for the com­munit­ies that stand to be­ne­fit the most. And per­haps no place in Amer­ica em­bod­ies both the prom­ise and per­il of the frack­ing eco­nomy more than Darick Fran­zen’s ad­op­ted ho­met­own.

“CITY” IS A BIT of a mis­nomer when it comes to Wat­ford City—even after the boom, and even by North Dakota stand­ards. If you ig­nore the oil wells and bur­geon­ing hous­ing de­vel­op­ments on the out­skirts, the McK­en­zie County seat still re­sembles the quint­es­sen­tial Amer­ic­an small town: There’s a his­tor­ic four-block down­town with some ad­ja­cent single-fam­ily hous­ing, a smat­ter­ing of churches, and a gas sta­tion where old-timers gath­er each morn­ing to dis­cuss the news of the day. (When I vis­ited, there was much spec­u­la­tion as to the men­tal state of the mur­der­ous Ger­man­wings pi­lot.) People greet each oth­er by name as they shop for mo­tor oil and beef jerky, and the sta­tion serves as something of a proto-Craigslist. “Do you know any­body look­ing for a room­mate?” one man asked the cash­ier. (She didn’t.)

(RE­LATED: BP Really Wants You to Think the Gulf Is OK)

Just south of down­town, a ma­jor new com­mer­cial strip opened in 2013, with a huge Cash Rite gro­cery store, a much-needed li­quor store, and a Mex­ic­an fast-food joint, among oth­er es­sen­tials. At noon on week­days, the sprawl­ing park­ing lot is filled with muddy pickups and semi trucks; my rent­al Toyota Co­rolla feels like a go-cart com­pared with the be­hemoths that dom­in­ate the roads around Wat­ford City. There’s even a Ja­pan­ese res­taur­ant in town now; at lunch­time, rough­necks with dirt caked on their clothes can be seen dig­ging in­to sashimi.

In the ini­tial boom peri­od, most new res­id­ents were housed in so-called “man camps”—rudi­ment­ary lodgings that of­ten lacked elec­tri­city and run­ning wa­ter. The man camps have mostly dis­ap­peared now, re­placed by apart­ment build­ings and sprawl­ing hous­ing de­vel­op­ments like Fran­zen’s. The new con­struc­tion is sprout­ing up away from the his­tor­ic core of the town, of­ten sep­ar­ated by bar­ren fields; the neigh­bor­hoods feel al­most ex­urb­an in char­ac­ter. By North Dakota stand­ards, liv­ing here is now shock­ingly ex­pens­ive: While you can rent a three-bed­room house in re­l­at­ively cos­mo­pol­it­an Bis­mar­ck for $675 a month, it’ll run you roughly $3,500 a month in Wat­ford City; one-bed­room apart­ments can com­mand $1,300 or so, an eye-pop­ping amount for nat­ives. “The most amaz­ing thing for those of us who live here and grew up here is to see land sell by the square foot in McK­en­zie County,” says Dale Pat­ten, a banker who moved to Wat­ford City in 1980. “I can re­mem­ber when I thought $500 per square acre was an ex­tra­vag­ant amount to pay for land.”

There wer­en’t enough gro­cery stores to meet de­mand; there wasn’t enough of any­thing, really, ex­cept for oil.

The in­flux of new­comers has changed the town for the bet­ter in some ways—busi­ness has been great, cer­tainly, and young people have star­ted re­turn­ing home after col­lege rather than light­ing out for Fargo or Min­neapol­is. But it’s had un­set­tling ef­fects on the so­cial fab­ric of a town that was long defined by its in­su­lar­ity. Gene Veed­er, a Wat­ford City nat­ive who’s now the county’s eco­nom­ic-de­vel­op­ment dir­ect­or, be­moans the ad­vent of a “crude cul­ture” in Wat­ford City—and by “crude,” he doesn’t mean oil. “When I’m out in a res­taur­ant eat­ing with my fam­ily, you hear guys throw­ing f-bombs around,” he says. “You would not have had that be­fore.” (In­deed, one day as I ate lunch in town, I over­heard two truck drivers hav­ing a re­mark­ably frank—and loud—dis­cus­sion about their ex­ploits with pros­ti­tutes, com­par­ing the vari­ous “ser­vices” on of­fer in North Dakota with those in Nevada.) The new people also have a propensity, Veed­er says, to “trash the town,” lit­er­ally. The at­ti­tude, he says, seems to be, “”Š’I’m here now, but I’m go­ing to be out of here, so I don’t care if I throw my trash out on the street.‘“Š” Loc­al folks have re­sor­ted to or­gan­iz­ing cleanup days.

“The first wave of people that came here,” says a loc­al busi­ness lead­er who asked that I not use his name, “couldn’t hold a job back home. Prob­ably had al­co­hol or drug prob­lems. Di­vorced. Lazy. Bust-outs.” The oil fields be­came one of the few places where con­victed sex of­fend­ers could eas­ily find work; com­pan­ies were des­per­ate to hire any­body they could find. McK­en­zie County be­came more dan­ger­ous in a tan­gible way, too: It now has the highest road-fatal­ity rate in the state. “It used to be, if you hit ice, you spun out and drove in­to a ditch,” la­ments Neal Ship­man, a Wat­ford City nat­ive who ed­its the McK­en­zie County Farm­er. “Now you get hit by an on­com­ing truck.”

Of the thou­sands who have moved to Wat­ford City, Veed­er es­tim­ates that roughly 30 per­cent plan to stay; the rest will move on once they’ve made their money or the profits dry up. That means most of the folks who live here are any­thing but in­ves­ted in the well-be­ing and long-term fu­ture of the com­munity. An­drew Lom­bardi, for in­stance, is part of the 70 per­cent who see Wat­ford City as a tem­por­ary stop. Last year, the 29-year-old moved to Wat­ford City with his girl­friend from the hip­ster mecca of Mis­soula, Montana, tak­ing an un­usu­ally good-pay­ing job at the new SOKA Mat­tress store. The lack of cul­tur­al amen­it­ies has him pin­ing for Mis­soula. There, he would of­ten see live mu­sic; now Lom­bardi spends most of his non­work time play­ing video games. And even that can be a chal­lenge in Wat­ford City. “There’s no GameStop here!” Lom­bardi com­plains. “The closest one is in Wil­lis­ton.” That’s about an hour away.

Like thou­sands of oth­ers—who knows how many?—Lom­bardi plans to stay in North Dakota for no more than two to four years. “I have no in­ten­tion of mak­ing friends,” he says. “I’m here to make money and leave.”

THE TUR­BU­LENT ex­per­i­ence of the past few years has turned seem­ingly every North Dakota res­id­ent in­to an am­a­teur en­ergy-mar­ket ana­lyst. On rur­al ra­dio sta­tions, DJs re­cite the cost of crude along with the weath­er fore­cast (snow, by the way, in late March) at the top of the hour. At the Out­laws’ Bar and Grill in Wil­lis­ton, the up-to-date price of oil is writ­ten on a chalk­board along­side the drink spe­cials. At the state cap­it­ol in Bis­mar­ck, every­body’s tethered to their devices, says Gov. Jack Dalrymple: “In this cap­it­ol build­ing, all winter long, people are walk­ing around with their smart­phones check­ing the price of oil about once an hour.”

Darick Fran­zen joined the oil rush in 2011, leav­ing his fam­ily be­hind in Illinois. (The Bakken)

They have reas­on to. Last June, the price of a bar­rel of crude stood at around $115; since this winter, it’s been hov­er­ing at about $50. North Dakota oil goes for even less than that—about $38 a bar­rel—be­cause of the high costs as­so­ci­ated with mov­ing the stuff out of a geo­graph­ic­ally re­mote loc­ale. The plunging price of crude has sent shud­ders through the Bakken and Wat­ford City. The fu­ture now seems even more un­cer­tain than it did dur­ing the heady days of the ini­tial boom, and omin­ous signs are every­where. In the past year, the num­ber of act­ive drilling rigs in North Dakota—the ones that drill new wells—has fallen by more than half, from a peak of 218 to few­er than 100. To main­tain cur­rent pro­duc­tion levels, in­dustry of­fi­cials say, the state needs to have 115 drilling rigs act­ive. Pro­duc­tion has been drop­ping by the month, in­clud­ing a 3.3 per­cent plunge from Decem­ber to Janu­ary alone.

The scale-back was as sud­den and un­ex­pec­ted as the ini­tial drilling ex­plo­sion. As soon as the oil price began to tank, the drillers shif­ted in­to re­verse. “These oil com­pan­ies re­act way quick­er than man­u­fac­tur­ing or ag­ri­cul­ture,” says Veed­er, the eco­nom­ic-de­vel­op­ment guru. “They’re nimble.” That might be smart for the bot­tom line, but it out­rages people like Darick Fran­zen. “What’s sad to me is big oil came to North Dakota through tech­no­logy and be­cause there is an as­set here,” he says. “They begged for the state to do this, and they begged these com­munit­ies to do this, and they asked de­velopers to come here, build, please. We need hous­ing and we need people. Then, boom, the price of oil drops and they flipped the switch.”

Tessa Sand­strom, com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for the North Dakota Pet­ro­leum Coun­cil, says the com­pan­ies aren’t leav­ing west­ern North Dakota high and dry. “This is a 40-year play,” she says. “Com­pan­ies have their of­fices here and they plan on stay­ing here. We have a com­munity out­reach com­mit­tee that fo­cuses on cor­por­ate so­cial re­spons­ib­il­ity and giv­ing back to com­munit­ies.” At the same time, busi­ness is busi­ness. “Oil is just like dur­um, len­tils, corn, or any oth­er com­mod­ity, in that it’s sub­ject to sup­ply and de­mand,” she says. “We can’t sell the product if the mar­ket for it is down, which, at this point, it is.”

Ac­cord­ing to Gov. Dalrymple, the scal­ing back hasn’t yet res­ul­ted in mass lay­offs. “What, so far, we are see­ing is a sig­ni­fic­ant cut­back in hours for people who work in the oil and gas in­dustry,” he says. “A lot of people came up here to get 60 hours a week. Now they have been cut back to 40.” Ron Ness of the North Dakota Pet­ro­leum Coun­cil says that’s the usu­al pat­tern. “Oil com­pan­ies start by re­du­cing over­time,” he says, be­cause they “can’t af­ford to lose their work­force.” But if the price re­mains de­pressed, he says, “even­tu­ally they’ll have to.”

It’s not just the oil com­pan­ies that are scal­ing back. Jason Vedadi, a com­mer­cial and res­id­en­tial build­er who is de­vel­op­ing a ma­jor hous­ing pro­ject in Wat­ford City, says his sub­con­tract­ors have been bid­ding 20 to 25 per­cent less of late—a bad sign. Thanks to the pent-up de­mand for hous­ing, the hous­ing de­vel­op­ment he’s build­ing is still go­ing full-speed ahead. But Vedadi began it last year, when oil prices were high and the pop­u­la­tion was ex­pand­ing. He doesn’t know—nobody does—how much more hous­ing, if any, will need to be built in the fu­ture.

Po­lice chief Art Wal­gren drives past wells in McK­en­zie County, which now has North Dakota’s highest road-fatal­ity rate. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

Com­mer­cial busi­nesses, after flour­ish­ing like crazy for so long, are feel­ing the pinch, too. “Right now, it’s a cost-cut­ting en­vir­on­ment,” says Gene Veed­er. “That trickles down. You know, the guy’s not mak­ing $20,000 in over­time. That $20,000 might have bought him a pickup. Or he might have went to the movies twice a week in­stead of once a week.”

Or, for that mat­ter, he might have gone out to a res­taur­ant. Aaron Pelton, co-own­er of Out­laws’ Bar and Grill, es­tim­ates that sales have dropped 10 per­cent since the oil price star­ted to fall. That might not sound like much, but it’s sig­ni­fic­ant in the low-mar­gin res­taur­ant busi­ness, and it’s a huge change from the go-go peri­od from 2009 to 2014, when sales went up month by month. Pelton, who grew up in Wat­ford City, re­turned home just be­fore the boom hit after liv­ing in Ari­zona for sev­er­al years. A gen­i­al mid-30s fel­low with two kids, he’s the kind of guy who seems to know every­body in town; as we chat for about an hour, in a room be­hind the main din­ing area, he iden­ti­fies by name just about every per­son we see walk by. (“That’s the may­or’s wife,” he in­ter­jects at one point.)

Pelton pro­fesses to take the long view of the slow­down. “Even if there are com­pan­ies pick­ing up and mov­ing out to­mor­row,” he says, “does that mean that the oil is not un­der­neath us?” Still, if he branches out and opens an­oth­er Out­laws’, Pelton says he’ll look for an area that isn’t tethered to the oil in­dustry.

DARICK FRAN­ZEN ges­tures out his front win­dow to the smat­ter­ing of ranch houses, con­nec­ted by dirt roads, that dot the hill­side of his hous­ing de­vel­op­ment. “I’ve seen four fam­il­ies in the last month back their U-Haul to their gar­age door and pack up, go back to Idaho or Mis­souri, or wherever it was,” he says. Des­pite the of­fi­cial happy talk about re­duced hours rather than lay­offs, it’s plainly evid­ent that some folks have already aban­doned ship. Pas­tor Bob Lawson, who moved to Wat­ford City four years ago from near Buf­falo, New York, to lead a newly planted con­greg­a­tion, at­tests to it as well. “You see less traffic,” he tells me over gas-sta­tion cof­fee. (There’s still no Star­bucks in Wat­ford City.) “I know some people that have packed up and gone home. They went home at Christ­mas and didn’t come back.”

With hous­ing scarce and ex­pens­ive, port­able hous­ing was brought in for teach­ers and staff at Wat­ford City Ele­ment­ary School. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

In March, North Dakota ceded its status as the state with the low­est un­em­ploy­ment rate to Neb­raska. At this early junc­ture, it’s im­possible to say how much the grow­ing un­em­ploy­ment, after such a long peri­od of job growth, has trans­lated in­to a re­versal of North Dakota’s his­tor­ic pop­u­la­tion surge. Keith Iver­son, the man­ager of the North Dakota Census Of­fice, feels sure that people are leav­ing—or, at least, not com­ing back. “North Dakota has had a large num­ber of non­res­id­ent work­ers spend­ing about half their time in the state—work­ing but main­tain­ing a res­id­ence else­where,” he says, put­ting the num­ber at 40,000 to 60,000. “My guess is that the size of this non­res­id­ent group “… is prob­ably shrink­ing now.” The im­prove­ment in the labor mar­ket na­tion­wide may be con­trib­ut­ing to the de­par­tures; un­like in 2009 or 2011, when so many flocked to North Dakota, there’s a pretty good chance that folks can find a job back where they came from. If the prices don’t bounce back—if pro­duc­tion doesn’t bounce back—there’s no pre­dict­ing how many will de­cide to move on.

But don’t tell Dale Pat­ten it’s time to pan­ic. “I don’t think the sky is fall­ing,” says Pat­ten, a lifelong North Dakotan who’s the pres­id­ent of Wat­ford City’s Corner­stone Bank, where the lobby is fes­tooned with a large, stuffed bison head and as­sor­ted an­im­al car­casses. “There are 60,000 wells to be drilled.” There is something, it seems, about the North Dakotan psyche—toughened up by dec­ades of eco­nom­ic hard­ship and by those pun­ish­ing win­ters—that keeps people groun­ded in good times and bad. Pat­ten epi­tom­izes that sobri­ety, down to his slow, meas­ured tone of voice and the fact that he wears blue jeans to work. The oil will make its way out of the ground, he says; the only ques­tion is how long it will take—and what that will mean for the eco­nomy. “They were talk­ing 12 to 15 years,” he says. “Maybe now it’s 25 to 30 years.” No mat­ter, he says: “The long-term looks good”—at least for “smart, care­ful, cau­tious people who are well-cap­it­al­ized.” They, he says, “are go­ing to come through, just like they nor­mally do.”

This san­guine view is far more pre­val­ent among long­time res­id­ents than new­comers. “We view this situ­ation as a clas­sic com­mod­ity shakeout,” says Gov. Dalrymple, who ought to know: He’s a Yale gradu­ate who re­turned home to work on the fam­ily wheat farm. “We are used to ag­ri­cul­tur­al com­mod­it­ies in North Dakota, and the people up here un­der­stand the cyc­lic­al­ity of com­mod­it­ies.”

But, as the gov­ernor knows, the im­pact of oil on the state eco­nomy adds up to con­sid­er­ably more than all its oth­er com­mod­it­ies com­bined. In fact, at first blush, North Dakota’s budget looks pos­it­ively Venezuelan. In 2014, ac­cord­ing to the North Dakota Pet­ro­leum Coun­cil, tax rev­en­ue from oil and gas ex­trac­tion totaled $3.25 bil­lion—a whop­ping 54 per­cent of all state taxes col­lec­ted. (By con­trast, Ca­ra­cas re­lies on oil rev­en­ue for 45 per­cent of its budget.) Even for an en­ergy state, North Dakota is an out­lier: Texas col­lects only about 5.5 per­cent of its tax rev­en­ue from oil and gas; in Louisi­ana, it’s about 14 per­cent.

With prices plum­met­ing since last sum­mer, the num­ber of act­ive drilling rigs has fallen by more than half. (AP Photo/Mat­thew Brown)

In mid-March, North Dakota re­vised its budget plans for 2015 to 2017, cut­ting pro­jec­ted rev­en­ue roughly in half. That shaved off a cool $4 bil­lion in pro­jec­ted tax rev­en­ue, which had been fore­cast to come in at $8.2 bil­lion. For the time be­ing, however, the state’s situ­ation is not as dire as it might sound. The frugal­ity of North Dakota’s Re­pub­lic­an-dom­in­ated le­gis­lature could end up look­ing like a sav­ing grace if oil prices don’t rock­et up again any­time soon. Rather than in­crease spend­ing dra­mat­ic­ally, the state has put the vast ma­jor­ity of oil-tax rev­en­ue in­to long-term trust funds. Only 6 per­cent of North Dakota’s two-year gen­er­al-fund budget is tied to oil rev­en­ue. “This le­gis­lature has been ex­tremely con­ser­vat­ive,” says Gov. Dalrymple, “and has planned well for this price tri­al, know­ing it would prob­ably oc­cur someday.”

Alas, the “price tri­al” may con­tin­ue—or worsen. In mid-March, Bloomberg re­por­ted that Cit­ig­roup ana­lysts pre­dict oil prices “will again nose­dive, po­ten­tially all the way to $20 a bar­rel.” That’s partly be­cause Saudi Ar­a­bia, where the re­serves are so massive and pro­duc­tion so cheap that its oil in­dustry can break even at $9 a bar­rel, has de­cided to main­tain high levels of pro­ductiv­ity—mainly to harm its com­pet­it­ors. (The eco­nom­ic lo­gic is as ruth­less as it is com­pel­ling: Saudi Ar­a­bia can still make huge profits off lower prices, and keep­ing its spig­ot flow­ing could drive smal­ler play­ers like North Dakota out of the mar­ket.) And if oil-re­lated sanc­tions are lif­ted on Ir­an, as ex­pec­ted, that coun­try could also flood the mar­ket, de­press­ing the price even fur­ther.

North Dakota has tried not to re­peat the mis­takes of oth­er states, like West Vir­gin­ia, which de­pended so heav­ily on re­source-ex­trac­tion—forest­ing and coal-min­ing, in this case—that it didn’t de­vel­op oth­er in­dus­tries, oth­er sources of wealth. Look­ing for­ward, though, North Dakota’s law­makers clearly have their con­cerns about wheth­er care­ful plan­ning will be enough to pull the state through. This winter, they de­cided to dabble in a rare bit of Keyne­sian­ism, passing a $1.1 bil­lion “surge” bill to fund massive con­struc­tion pro­jects—high­ways, mostly, to handle heavy trucks—throughout west­ern North Dakota. Pro­ponents say pop­u­la­tion growth ne­ces­sit­ates a buildup of in­fra­struc­ture, but they also hope that the spend­ing will help the state weath­er the oil bust by pump­ing money in­to loc­al com­munit­ies and cre­at­ing jobs for people who have lost oil-re­lated work. In one sense, though, the “surge” also doubles down on the oil eco­nomy; once the price re­bounds, the think­ing goes, there will be more in­fra­struc­ture in place that can grease the skids of an­oth­er boom.

When—if—that next boom ar­rives, Darick Fran­zen doesn’t know if he’ll still be around to rev­el in it. In mid-March, the con­struc­tion com­pany laid him off, and the Cham­ber of Com­merce chief joined the thou­sands of oth­ers won­der­ing wheth­er to gamble on oil prices to re­bound or to leave Wat­ford City while the get­ting’s good. Fran­zen would prefer to stay, but he says he’ll have to think about re­turn­ing to Illinois if he can’t find a good job soon. He doesn’t sound es­pe­cially op­tim­ist­ic. “I’ve in­ter­viewed with two groups in just the last three days,” he says, adding: “I don’t know. It’s a dif­fer­ent place now. It’s “… this re­gion is a dif­fer­ent place.”

COR­REC­TION: An earli­er ver­sion of this story said North Dakota had a pro­jec­ted tax rev­en­ue stream of $8.2 mil­lion. In fact, it was $8.2 bil­lion.

What We're Following See More »
Latest Count: 12 Trump Campaign Staffers Had Contact with Russians
1 days ago
Mueller Seeks Documents from DOJ
3 days ago

Special counsel Robert Mueller "is now demanding documents from the department overseeing his investigation." A source tells ABC News that "Mueller's investigators are keen to obtain emails related to the firing of FBI Director James Comey and the earlier decision of Attorney General Jeff Sessions to recuse himself from the entire matter."

Trump May Be OK with Dropping Mandate Repeal
3 days ago

"President Donald Trump would not insist on including repeal of an Obama-era health insurance mandate in a bill intended to enact the biggest overhaul of the tax code since the 1980s, a senior White House aide said on Sunday. The version of tax legislation put forward by Senate Republican leaders would remove a requirement in former President Barack Obama’s signature healthcare law that taxes Americans who decline to buy health insurance."

Media Devoting More Resources to Lawmakers’ Sexual Misconduct
3 days ago

"Members of Congress with histories of mistreating women should be extremely nervous. Major outlets, including CNN, are dedicating substantial newsroom resources to investigating sexual harassment allegations against numerous lawmakers. A Republican source told me he's gotten calls from well-known D.C. reporters who are gathering stories about sleazy members."

Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
6 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.