A Big Fight Over a Small Slice of the Transportation Pie

The perennial debate over how much federal funding should go to mass transit is raging again.

Commuters board a Metro train August 19, 2010 in Washington, DC. AFP PHOTO/Karen BLEIER (Photo credit should read KAREN BLEIER/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Fawn Johnson
Add to Briefcase
Fawn Johnson
April 22, 2015, 5:30 p.m.

If high­ways and bridges took the form of a high school foot­ball jock, metro buses and sub­ways would be that guy’s an­noy­ing kid sis­ter.

Mass trans­it re­ceives 20 per­cent of the money placed in­to the high­way trust fund from fed­er­al gas taxes. Its rider­ship is grow­ing, par­tic­u­larly among tex­ting-happy mil­len­ni­als, yet mass-trans­it ad­voc­ates must re­peatedly de­fend that re­l­at­ively small share of the fund­ing pot. They ad­mit it can get tire­some. They even bristle at the jar­gon of­ten used to refer to the meas­ure that gives them their live­li­hood; journ­al­ists and law­makers alike tend to refer to it as “the high­way bill.”

“This shouldn’t be The Hun­ger Games,” said Polly Trot­ten­berg, a former Trans­port­a­tion De­part­ment un­der­sec­ret­ary who is now the trans­port­a­tion com­mis­sion­er for New York City. “There is a de­sire for trans­it all over the coun­try.”

This year, the con­gres­sion­al fight over trans­it is a small blip with­in the broad­er sur­face-trans­port­a­tion de­bate, which fo­cuses al­most en­tirely on over­all fund­ing. But the protests against fed­er­ally-fun­ded trans­it still ex­ist. This means Trans­port­a­tion Com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Peter De­Fazio must con­tin­ue stat­ing, as he has many times in the past, that he won’t sup­port a bill that cuts fund­ing for mass trans­it. Chair­man Bill Shuster knows this, and he has more or less agreed to keep trans­it fund­ing un­touched for the sake of keep­ing the bill bi­par­tis­an. For De­Fazio, that’s huge pro­gress.

“We’re not start­ing with, you know … zero for trans­it. Bill [Shuster] is much more real­ist­ic than that,” De­Fazio said. “We’re look­ing more at the tra­di­tion­al share that goes to trans­it.”

Yet Shuster also needs to get the bill through com­mit­tee with at least two con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers who op­pose a fed­er­al trans­it pro­gram—Ken­tucky Re­pub­lic­an Thomas Massie and former South Car­o­lina Re­pub­lic­an Gov. Mark San­ford. Both Massie and San­ford have in­tro­duced le­gis­la­tion (with long odds of passing) to do away with the mass-trans­it ac­count with­in the high­way trust fund. Massie’s would im­me­di­ately re­peal the mass-trans­it ac­count and fed­er­al money for ped­es­tri­an and bi­cycle paths. San­ford’s would phase out the mass-trans­it ac­count over five years.

These bills agit­ate trans­it ad­voc­ates. Their latest re­sponse is to hold pub­lic ral­lies. Earli­er this month, the Amer­ic­an Pub­lic Trans­port­a­tion As­so­ci­ation or­gan­ized some 350 or­gan­iz­a­tions to con­duct 150 na­tion­wide events for a grass­roots ad­vocacy day dubbed “Stand Up For Trans­port­a­tion.”

“This is a na­tion­al move­ment, and we are not go­ing away,” said APTA Chair Phil Wash­ing­ton, who also is the CEO of Den­ver’s RTD mass-trans­port­a­tion sys­tem. “This is our wake-up call to Con­gress.”

“The two bills are something we take very ser­i­ously,” said APTA Pres­id­ent Mi­chael Melaniphy. “These are hor­rible ideas. They are dev­ast­at­ing to this na­tion.”

The flare-up re­flects a genu­ine and on­go­ing ten­sion about where to put scarce fed­er­al trans­port­a­tion dol­lars. Skep­tics ask wheth­er 20 per­cent of na­tion­ally-gathered money should go to sys­tems that be­ne­fit a much smal­ler per­cent­age of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion. It’s true that New York City would be dev­ast­ated without its sub­way sys­tem. It cov­ers 5,000 miles and car­ries 8.7 mil­lion people a day, ac­cord­ing to the New York Met­ro­pol­it­an Trans­port­a­tion Au­thor­ity.

Yet out­side of six ma­jor cit­ies—New York, Chica­go, Phil­adelphia, San Fran­cisco, Bo­ston, and Wash­ing­ton—just 2.4 per­cent of com­muters use mass trans­it, ac­cord­ing to Wendell Cox, a former mem­ber of the Los Angeles County Trans­port­a­tion Com­mis­sion and now a vis­it­ing fel­low at the con­ser­vat­ive Her­it­age Found­a­tion. “Trans­it is not a genu­inely fed­er­al is­sue. Pub­lic fund­ing for trans­it would be more ap­pro­pri­ately provided by the states and loc­al­it­ies,” Cox ar­gued in a re­cent is­sue brief.

This de­bate is tak­ing place at a time when car-cent­ric mo­bil­ity is slowly ebbing and urb­an dis­tricts are be­com­ing even big­ger drivers of the U.S. eco­nomy. Large U.S. cit­ies of 150,000 or more in­hab­it­ants gen­er­ated al­most 85 per­cent of the coun­try’s GDP in 2010, ac­cord­ing to the McKin­sey Glob­al In­sti­tute. Eco­nom­ic growth in those areas has only con­tin­ued since then. Around the world, the U.S. eco­nomy is con­sidered the most urb­an-de­pend­ent among de­veloped coun­tries.

Even if city-dwell­ers aren’t ditch­ing their cars, they still need op­tions to get from place to place. It’s not un­com­mon for urb­an and sub­urb­an res­id­ents to rely on two or three modes of trans­port­a­tion to get to work, for ex­ample. That’s why pub­lic-trans­it ad­voc­ates con­tinu­ally re­peat the word “in­teg­rated” on Cap­it­ol Hill to em­phas­ize that the coun­try’s trans­port­a­tion net­work needs to give people lots of op­tions—in­ter­states, coun­try roads, com­muter rail, sub­ways, bike paths, and side­walks.

“We’re not go­ing to double-deck all of our roads and bridges across the coun­try,” Melaniphy said. “If we want it to work to­geth­er well, it has to work to­geth­er well as a sys­tem.”

Last year, the lib­er­al Pub­lic In­terest Re­search Group re­leased a re­port show­ing that for the first time since World War II, the auto­mobile miles traveled by Amer­ic­ans had leveled off to roughly 3 tril­lion a year. It was sharp de­par­ture from a con­sist­ently steady up­ward climb since the 1940s, ac­cord­ing to PIRG’s ana­lys­is of Trans­port­a­tion De­part­ment data.

PIRG also found that the people who are driv­ing the least are the young­est. Of the com­mut­ing trips taken between 2006 and 2013, car trips dropped 1.5 per­cent among 16- to 24-year-olds and 1.3 per­cent among 25- to 44-year-olds, the study says. True, that’s not a huge drop, but it re­flects a steady trend of young people choos­ing to use oth­er modes of travel.

Vet­er­an Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress don’t need con­vin­cing that trans­it is an es­sen­tial com­pon­ent of the sur­face-trans­port­a­tion bill. Even if they don’t like the mass-trans­it ac­count in prin­ciple, they know the only way to get the must-pass le­gis­la­tion en­acted is by al­low­ing it to con­tin­ue. But the new­er con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers do need con­vin­cing, APTA’s Melaniphy says. He be­lieves they have come to Wash­ing­ton un­fa­mil­i­ar with trans­port­a­tion is­sues and see trans­it as an easy place to cut. That means APTA feels it ne­ces­sary to be on the Hill edu­cat­ing them each year.

“We’ve cer­tainly heard from lead­er­ship that they may have had these views early on, but there is a real­iz­a­tion that they can’t take these sys­tems for gran­ted,” Melaniphy said.

What We're Following See More »
WOULD WAIT SIX MONTHS
Military Seeks Delay in Transgender Policy
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS
WANTS ANSWERS ON CLINTON EMAIL PROBE
Senate Judiciary Sends Questions to Loretta Lynch
3 hours ago
THE LATEST
WASN’T INFORMED HE COULD BE DEPORTED
SCOTUS Throws Out Immigrant’s Conviction, Citing Poor Representation
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday threw out a legal immigrant's drug conviction on the grounds that his lawyer had failed to advise him that he could be deported to his native South Korea if found guilty. The court ruled 6-2 in favor of Jae Lee, who ran two restaurants in Memphis, Tennessee and has lived in the United States since 1982 when he was 12. Despite the ruling, Lee could still be deported if he is tried and convicted again for the drug offense."

Source:
JOBS TRUMP CLAIMED TO SAVE
Carrier Moving 600 Jobs to Mexico
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS
LONG RUMORED
Jets Owner Woody Johnson Nominated as Ambassador to UK
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login