David Vitter Wants to Subpoena Obamacare Documents. Do Republicans Have His Back?

He wants info on why Congress is considered a “small business” for health insurance purposes.

US Senator David Vitter (L) speaks during a press conference on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, September 30, 2013. Senator Vitter penned an amendment to nix subsidies for the health care of congressional staffers. 
National Journal
April 21, 2015, 1:20 p.m.

Sen. Dav­id Vit­ter wants an­swers on Obama­care. On Thursday, he’ll learn if the Re­pub­lic­an mem­bers of the com­mit­tee he chairs are be­hind him.

The sen­at­or from Louisi­ana has been lead­ing a cru­sade to un­cov­er why mem­bers of Con­gress and their staffers re­ceive their health in­sur­ance on D.C.’s small busi­ness ex­change—and the em­ploy­er con­tri­bu­tion that goes along with that des­ig­na­tion—rather than the in­di­vidu­al mar­ket­place. So Vit­ter’s Small Busi­ness and En­tre­pren­eur­ship Com­mit­tee will vote on wheth­er to sub­poena doc­u­ments sent to the D.C. Health Be­ne­fit Ex­change Au­thor­ity (which over­sees the Dis­trict’s health mar­ket­place).

The pan­el roster has 10 Re­pub­lic­ans and nine Demo­crats, so Vit­ter will likely need every Re­pub­lic­an on his side to ap­prove the sub­poena.

But on Tues­day, Sens. Deb Fisc­her and Kelly Ayotte didn’t say how they would vote; they said they wer­en’t con­fid­ent there was go­ing to be a vote on the sub­poena and didn’t com­ment on wheth­er they would sup­port Vit­ter’s en­deavor. And Sen. James Risch wouldn’t defin­it­ively say how he planned to vote, as he has work to do to catch up to speed be­fore he takes a po­s­i­tion.

A news re­lease from the com­mit­tee stated that a vote will oc­cur Thursday and that “most Com­mit­tee Re­pub­lic­ans are com­mit­ted to sup­port­ing Vit­ter’s re­quest to sub­poena the doc­u­ments.” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, the pan­el’s top Demo­crat, op­poses the sub­poena, ac­cord­ing to her press sec­ret­ary, Vivek Kem­baiy­an.

How Con­gress re­ceives its health care has been a thorny is­sue dat­ing back to the Af­ford­able Care Act’s ne­go­ti­ations. Demo­crats say Con­gress is a large em­ploy­er, and thus should provide its em­ploy­ees with health cov­er­age, as the law man­dates large com­pan­ies must do.

On the oth­er side of the aisle, Re­pub­lic­ans ar­gue that Con­gress should live with­in the same health sys­tem it im­poses on oth­ers and should re­ceive in­sur­ance through the on­line ex­changes. Vit­ter has taken up this cause—and taken it a step fur­ther: Con­gress isn’t a small busi­ness, he says, and staffers and mem­bers shouldn’t be on the small busi­ness ex­change, which al­lows them to re­ceive em­ploy­er con­tri­bu­tions to­ward their health in­sur­ance.

“Con­gress should ab­so­lutely not be ex­empt from liv­ing un­der Obama­care just like the mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans who don’t get a spe­cial tax­pay­er fun­ded sub­sidy. The only way Con­gress was able to ex­empt it­self from Obama­care was by cre­at­ing a loop­hole and des­ig­nat­ing it­self as a ‘Small Busi­ness,’ ” Vit­ter said in a state­ment. “Thursday’s vote is an op­por­tun­ity for mem­bers of Con­gress to pub­licly stand for gov­ern­ment trans­par­ency and ac­count­ab­il­ity, tak­ing one step closer to liv­ing un­der Obama­care—the same as the rest of Amer­ica, not an elite rul­ing class. Is­su­ing this sub­poena will al­low us to find out who is re­spons­ible for al­low­ing Con­gress to re­ceive a spe­cial tax­pay­er-fun­ded sub­sidy on Obama­care, so we can fix this—and ul­ti­mately, end the spe­cial ex­emp­tion.”

The sub­poena asks for nine un­re­dac­ted pages of ap­plic­a­tions that the Sen­ate and the House sub­mit­ted to the D.C. Health Be­ne­fit Ex­change Au­thor­ity to al­low mem­bers and staff to re­ceive health in­sur­ance through the small busi­ness mar­ket­place. More than 13,700 Con­gress mem­bers, staffers, and fam­ily mem­bers had signed up for Wash­ing­ton’s small busi­ness ex­change as of Feb. 8.

In Decem­ber, Vit­ter promp­ted Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans to pass a non­bind­ing party rule re­quir­ing all com­mit­tee, of­fice, and lead­er­ship staff to re­ceive their health in­sur­ance through the D.C. mar­ket­place. However, not all Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tee chairs plan to fol­low along.

What We're Following See More »
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
19 hours ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
TRUMP SAYS HE WILL SIGN
House Passes Funding Deal
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login