Brown, Gray, and Urban

Cities are where America will—or won’t—find common ground between the two giant generations reshaping the nation.

Immigrants await examination at Ellis Island.
National Journal
April 24, 2015, 1 a.m.

Cit­ies have al­ways been Amer­ica’s cru­cibles of change. When mil­lions of European im­mig­rants re­cast the na­tion’s iden­tity dur­ing the Melt­ing Pot era a cen­tury ago, they landed and lived mostly in cit­ies. Today, the United States is liv­ing through the most pro­found demo­graph­ic change since that time—and cit­ies again rep­res­ent the front line.

In our era, the United States is ex­per­i­en­cing two demo­graph­ic trans­itions: It is grow­ing more di­verse, es­pe­cially in its youth pop­u­la­tion, and it is also aging, as the pre­dom­in­antly white baby boomers move to­ward re­tire­ment. A com­pel­ling re­port re­leased Fri­day from the Uni­versity of South­ern Cali­for­nia’s Pro­gram for En­vir­on­ment­al and Re­gion­al Equity (PERE), Talk­ing ‘Bout Our Gen­er­a­tions, un­der­scores that it is mostly in met­ro­pol­it­an areas where these two gen­er­a­tions will find com­mon ground—or not. (The USC re­port was fun­ded by the Gen­er­a­tions Ini­ti­at­ive, a phil­an­throp­ic ef­fort that has also sup­por­ted Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Next Amer­ica pro­ject.)

+ Im­mig­rants await ex­am­in­a­tion at El­lis Is­land. (Lib­rary of Con­gress)The twin demo­graph­ic trans­itions are widen­ing what ana­lysts call a “cul­tur­al gen­er­a­tion gap” between the di­ver­si­fy­ing youth pop­u­la­tion (the Census Bur­eau pro­jects that minor­it­ies will be­come a ma­jor­ity of Amer­ica’s un­der-18 pop­u­la­tion in this dec­ade) and a seni­or pop­u­la­tion that re­mains about 80 per­cent white. These two gi­ant blocks—what I’ve called “the brown and the gray”—have be­come the com­pet­ing poles of Amer­ic­an polit­ics, with Demo­crat­ic-lean­ing young­er minor­it­ies sup­port­ing in­creased pub­lic spend­ing, par­tic­u­larly in areas such as edu­ca­tion and health care, and older whites, who are in­creas­ingly Re­pub­lic­an, mostly res­ist­ing it.

That con­trast is es­pe­cially vis­ible in and around cit­ies. As the re­port doc­u­ments, minor­it­ies already make up the ma­jor­ity of young people in 53 of the na­tion’s 150 largest met­ro­pol­it­an areas, and at least 40 per­cent in 26 more. (Young people of col­or are es­pe­cially dom­in­ant in the biggest cit­ies.) Mean­while, whites con­sti­tute a ma­jor­ity of seni­ors in all but four of the largest metro areas and at least three-fifths of seni­ors in all but 12.

Though their polit­ics have di­verged, the des­tinies of these two gi­ant gen­er­a­tions re­main in­ter­twined. Sev­er­al stud­ies pro­ject that minor­it­ies will provide all of the na­tion’s net new work­ers through 2030. And as the over­all pop­u­la­tion ages, those work­ers must shoulder the taxes that fund So­cial Se­cur­ity and Medi­care for a swell­ing num­ber of (mostly white) re­tir­ees, notes PERE dir­ect­or Manuel Pas­tor, who coau­thored the study. “We are cre­at­ing a group of adults that [will] need to be far more pro­duct­ive “¦ to sup­port a lar­ger share of re­tired adults,” he says. “That means we need people to get a bet­ter start in life and to have a much sharp­er tra­ject­ory to high­er earn­ings, be­cause they will be sup­port­ing more people with their taxes.”

In­stead, the op­pos­ite is hap­pen­ing. In 1979, house­holds headed by someone between 25 and 34 had a me­di­an in­come only 2 per­cent lower than house­holds led by those between 55 and 64. Now the young­er house­holds earn fully 18 per­cent less than the older ones; in in­fla­tion-ad­jus­ted dol­lars, young­er house­holds are worse off than in 1979. The fin­an­cial crash’s long af­ter­math partly ex­plains that de­teri­or­a­tion. But it also re­flects the con­tinu­ing short­fall in earn­ings and edu­ca­tion­al at­tain­ment among the young minor­it­ies who rep­res­ent a grow­ing por­tion of the young­er pop­u­la­tion.

While Afric­an-Amer­ic­an and His­pan­ic edu­ca­tion levels are im­prov­ing, the share of adults in both groups with four-year col­lege de­grees still lags far be­hind whites in all ma­jor cit­ies. That erodes their abil­ity to com­pete for jobs even in the cit­ies most ef­fect­ively gen­er­at­ing them. In an es­pe­cially com­pel­ling ana­lys­is, the re­port shows that fast-growth cit­ies are re­ly­ing more on im­port­ing well-edu­cated work­ers from else­where than on edu­cat­ing their own res­id­ents. In all ten cit­ies that have cre­ated the most jobs since 2000, the share of adults with col­lege de­grees born in the same state lags be­hind—of­ten well be­hind—the share of col­lege-edu­cated adults who have come from else­where in the United States.

This pat­tern can’t per­sist in­def­in­itely, be­cause most of Amer­ica’s kids are be­ing born in fast-growth cit­ies, and most of them are non­white: Even­tu­ally there won’t be enough (mostly white) young col­lege gradu­ates to lure from else­where. That means cit­ies will need to equip more of their own kids. To achieve that, the re­port ar­gues, cit­ies must in­vest more in en­han­cing pro­spects for low-in­come kids through everything from ex­pan­ded preschool to im­proved trans­port­a­tion op­tions. As a first step to­ward ac­tion, the au­thors praise ini­ti­at­ives in places like Seattle, Min­neapol­is, and Char­lotte to chart loc­al dis­par­it­ies and spur con­ver­sa­tions about clos­ing them.

The para­dox fa­cing cit­ies is that the eco­nom­ic in­equal­it­ies threat­en­ing them are rooted in na­tion­al and in­ter­na­tion­al forces (like glob­al com­pet­i­tion) mostly bey­ond their con­trol. Yet, as Pas­tor notes, the con­sequences of those trends are most vis­ible loc­ally, which makes it easi­er “for people to re­cog­nize their com­mon des­tiny.” That aware­ness has spurred a surge of loc­al ini­ti­at­ives aimed at eco­nom­ic in­clu­sion, like the push to raise mu­ni­cip­al min­im­um-wage levels. But the United States isn’t likely to pro­duce broadly shared growth un­til both our na­tion­al and loc­al policies re­cog­nize that there is no eco­nom­ic se­cur­ity for the gray without eco­nom­ic op­por­tun­ity for the brown.

What We're Following See More »
Mnuchin Tells Neal He Won't Comply with Subpoena for Trump Taxes
5 hours ago
Trump Cannot Block Subpoena of His Accounting Records
5 hours ago
White House Will Tell McGahn Not to Testify
8 hours ago
Prosecutors Poring Over Inauguration Documents
9 hours ago
SCOTUS Says Businesses Can't Donate to Candidates
9 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.