Obama Faces the Limits of His Drone Program

Death of two hostages highlights the dilemma the White House faces with counterterrorism operations.

President Barack Obama speaks during a press conference in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House on April 23, 2015 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
S.V. Dáte
Add to Briefcase
S.V. Dáte
April 23, 2015, 9:24 a.m.

No­bel Peace Prize-win­ner Barack Obama is once again con­front­ing the con­sequences of a coun­terter­ror­ism drone policy that he in­her­ited but has greatly ex­pan­ded upon tak­ing of­fice.

The deaths of an Amer­ic­an and an Itali­an be­ing held host­age by al-Qaida in a U.S. strike on an al-Qaida com­pound in the re­gion along the bor­der of Pakistan and Afgh­anistan get to the heart of the di­lemma that the drone war has cre­ated for Obama.

Obama ran for of­fice prom­ising to end two long ground wars Amer­ic­ans had grown weary of. He has largely been able to ac­com­plish that, thanks at least in part to an in­creased use of un­manned but leth­al air­craft—more lim­ited war by re­mote con­trol, which has brought its own costs.

The strike was con­duc­ted as part of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s on­go­ing pro­gram to kill ter­ror­ist lead­ers in the re­mote areas where many of them have set up bases. In a hast­ily ar­ranged speech, Obama said he took “full re­spons­ib­il­ity” for the op­er­a­tion and that he couldn’t ad­equately ad­dress the grief the fam­il­ies of War­ren Wein­stein and Gio­vanni Lo Porto must be feel­ing.

At the same time, Obama ar­gued, again, his coun­terter­ror­ism policy has saved in­no­cent lives both here and abroad, and the strike that ac­ci­dent­ally killed Wein­stein and Lo Porto did, in fact, ac­com­plish its in­ten­ded ob­ject­ive. “We do be­lieve that the op­er­a­tion did take out dan­ger­ous mem­bers of al-Qaida,” he said.

Obama prom­ised a full re­view of the strike to see what went wrong and what could be im­proved to make sure it doesn’t hap­pen again. It’s un­clear whom such a re­view will sat­is­fy, re­gard­less of its res­ult.

Some of Obama’s most fer­vent fans were in Europe pri­or to and fol­low­ing his elec­tion. He won the peace prize just nine months in­to his pres­id­ency, largely on the hope that he offered for peace. Now, Europe is home to some of Obama’s harshest crit­ics, when it comes to both coun­terter­ror­ism and elec­tron­ic sur­veil­lance.

Civil liber­tari­ans have cri­ti­cized him for con­tinu­ing a policy of killing sus­pec­ted ter­ror­ists, rather than ar­rest­ing and try­ing them. These crit­ics come from his own party as well as the liber­tari­an wing of the Re­pub­lic­an Party. Sen. Rand Paul raised his pro­file two years ago with an overnight fili­buster fol­low­ing a drone strike that tar­geted an Amer­ic­an cit­izen. And hu­man-rights act­iv­ists ar­gue that drone strikes of­ten kill in­no­cent ci­vil­ians and wind up cre­at­ing em­pathy for the ter­ror­ist group among the loc­al pop­u­la­tion.

Obama said that the Janu­ary strike was con­duc­ted when of­fi­cials de­term­ined that it was their only real op­tion. “Based on the in­tel­li­gence that we had ob­tained at the time, in­clud­ing hun­dreds of hours of sur­veil­lance, we be­lieved that this was an al-Qaida com­pound, that no ci­vil­ians were present, and that cap­tur­ing these ter­ror­ists was not pos­sible,” he said.

Also killed in that strike was Ahmed Farouq, an Amer­ic­an al-Qaida lead­er, while a second strike that same month killed Adam Gadahn, an Amer­ic­an who be­came an al-Qaida spokes­man. The White House ac­know­ledged in a state­ment that in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials were not tar­get­ing them, either, and had no idea they were present in the tar­geted loc­a­tions—just as they did not know al-Qaida was hold­ing Wein­stein and Lo Porto in the com­pound where they wound up dy­ing.

What We're Following See More »
JUST AS SENATE VOTES ITS DISAPPROVAL
Trump Backtracks on Putin's "Incredible Offer"
15 hours ago
THE LATEST
ARMS CONTROL, SYRIA WERE DISCUSSED
Russians Refer to "Verbal Agreements" with Trump
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Two days after President Trump’s summit with Russian President Vladi­mir Putin, Russian officials offered a string of assertions about what the two leaders had achieved. 'Important verbal agreements' were reached at the Helsinki meeting, Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Anatoly Antonov, told reporters in Moscow Wednesday, including preservation of the New Start and INF agreements," and cooperation in Syria.

Source:
WAS "GRUDGINGLY" CONVINCED
Trump Was Shown Proof of Russian Interference Before Inauguration
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Two weeks before his inauguration, Donald J. Trump was shown highly classified intelligence indicating that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had personally ordered complex cyberattacks to sway the 2016 American election. The evidence included texts and emails from Russian military officers and information gleaned from a top-secret source close to Mr. Putin, who had described to the C.I.A. how the Kremlin decided to execute its campaign of hacking and disinformation. Mr. Trump sounded grudgingly convinced, according to several people who attended the intelligence briefing. But ever since, Mr. Trump has tried to cloud the very clear findings that he received on Jan. 6, 2017, which his own intelligence leaders have unanimously endorsed."

TAKE THAT, HATERS
Trump: High IQ People Loved the Putin Meeting
1 days ago
THE LATEST
"POLICY DIFFERENCES DON'T MATTER"
Comey Says to Vote Democratic This Fall
2 days ago
THE LATEST
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login