Nobel Peace Prize-winner Barack Obama is once again confronting the consequences of a counterterrorism drone policy that he inherited but has greatly expanded upon taking office.
The deaths of an American and an Italian being held hostage by al-Qaida in a U.S. strike on an al-Qaida compound in the region along the border of Pakistan and Afghanistan get to the heart of the dilemma that the drone war has created for Obama.
Obama ran for office promising to end two long ground wars Americans had grown weary of. He has largely been able to accomplish that, thanks at least in part to an increased use of unmanned but lethal aircraft—more limited war by remote control, which has brought its own costs.
The strike was conducted as part of the intelligence community’s ongoing program to kill terrorist leaders in the remote areas where many of them have set up bases. In a hastily arranged speech, Obama said he took “full responsibility” for the operation and that he couldn’t adequately address the grief the families of Warren Weinstein and Giovanni Lo Porto must be feeling.
At the same time, Obama argued, again, his counterterrorism policy has saved innocent lives both here and abroad, and the strike that accidentally killed Weinstein and Lo Porto did, in fact, accomplish its intended objective. “We do believe that the operation did take out dangerous members of al-Qaida,” he said.
Obama promised a full review of the strike to see what went wrong and what could be improved to make sure it doesn’t happen again. It’s unclear whom such a review will satisfy, regardless of its result.
Some of Obama’s most fervent fans were in Europe prior to and following his election. He won the peace prize just nine months into his presidency, largely on the hope that he offered for peace. Now, Europe is home to some of Obama’s harshest critics, when it comes to both counterterrorism and electronic surveillance.
Civil libertarians have criticized him for continuing a policy of killing suspected terrorists, rather than arresting and trying them. These critics come from his own party as well as the libertarian wing of the Republican Party. Sen. Rand Paul raised his profile two years ago with an overnight filibuster following a drone strike that targeted an American citizen. And human-rights activists argue that drone strikes often kill innocent civilians and wind up creating empathy for the terrorist group among the local population.
Obama said that the January strike was conducted when officials determined that it was their only real option. “Based on the intelligence that we had obtained at the time, including hundreds of hours of surveillance, we believed that this was an al-Qaida compound, that no civilians were present, and that capturing these terrorists was not possible,” he said.
Also killed in that strike was Ahmed Farouq, an American al-Qaida leader, while a second strike that same month killed Adam Gadahn, an American who became an al-Qaida spokesman. The White House acknowledged in a statement that intelligence officials were not targeting them, either, and had no idea they were present in the targeted locations—just as they did not know al-Qaida was holding Weinstein and Lo Porto in the compound where they wound up dying.
What We're Following See More »
"The Justice Department inspector general referred its finding that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe repeatedly misled investigators who were examining a media disclosure to the top federal prosecutor in D.C. to determine whether McCabe should be charged with a crime." The referral occurred "after the inspector general concluded McCabe had lied to investigators or his own boss, then-FBI Director James B. Comey, on four occasions, three of them under oath." The referral does "not necessarily mean McCabe will be charge with a crime ... although the report alleged that one of McCabe’s lies 'was done knowingly and intentionally.'"
A federal appeals court in Chicago "upheld a nationwide injunction against making federal grant funding contingent on cooperation with immigration enforcement." The three Republican appointees ruled that the Trump administration "exceeded its legal authority in trying to implement the new conditions without approval from Congress ... One judge on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals panel, Reagan appointee Daniel Manion, said he would narrow the injunction solely to protect Chicago. However, the two other judges assigned to the case said the nationwide injunction appeared to be justified."
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley "decided Thursday to delay markup" on a bill to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller until next week. But he remains steadfast in his support for a committee vote, despite Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's "pledge to kill it" if it gets to the floor.
"The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee says Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., is poised to subpoena the Justice Department for former FBI Director James Comey’s memos, which the agency so far has failed to produce. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., warned such a move puts Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein in jeopardy of being placed in contempt of Congress and the special counsel investigation of being shut down prematurely."