Obama Faces the Limits of His Drone Program

Death of two hostages highlights the dilemma the White House faces with counterterrorism operations.

President Barack Obama speaks during a press conference in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House on April 23, 2015 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
April 23, 2015, 9:24 a.m.

No­bel Peace Prize-win­ner Barack Obama is once again con­front­ing the con­sequences of a coun­terter­ror­ism drone policy that he in­her­ited but has greatly ex­pan­ded upon tak­ing of­fice.

The deaths of an Amer­ic­an and an Itali­an be­ing held host­age by al-Qaida in a U.S. strike on an al-Qaida com­pound in the re­gion along the bor­der of Pakistan and Afgh­anistan get to the heart of the di­lemma that the drone war has cre­ated for Obama.

Obama ran for of­fice prom­ising to end two long ground wars Amer­ic­ans had grown weary of. He has largely been able to ac­com­plish that, thanks at least in part to an in­creased use of un­manned but leth­al air­craft—more lim­ited war by re­mote con­trol, which has brought its own costs.

The strike was con­duc­ted as part of the in­tel­li­gence com­munity’s on­go­ing pro­gram to kill ter­ror­ist lead­ers in the re­mote areas where many of them have set up bases. In a hast­ily ar­ranged speech, Obama said he took “full re­spons­ib­il­ity” for the op­er­a­tion and that he couldn’t ad­equately ad­dress the grief the fam­il­ies of War­ren Wein­stein and Gio­vanni Lo Porto must be feel­ing.

At the same time, Obama ar­gued, again, his coun­terter­ror­ism policy has saved in­no­cent lives both here and abroad, and the strike that ac­ci­dent­ally killed Wein­stein and Lo Porto did, in fact, ac­com­plish its in­ten­ded ob­ject­ive. “We do be­lieve that the op­er­a­tion did take out dan­ger­ous mem­bers of al-Qaida,” he said.

Obama prom­ised a full re­view of the strike to see what went wrong and what could be im­proved to make sure it doesn’t hap­pen again. It’s un­clear whom such a re­view will sat­is­fy, re­gard­less of its res­ult.

Some of Obama’s most fer­vent fans were in Europe pri­or to and fol­low­ing his elec­tion. He won the peace prize just nine months in­to his pres­id­ency, largely on the hope that he offered for peace. Now, Europe is home to some of Obama’s harshest crit­ics, when it comes to both coun­terter­ror­ism and elec­tron­ic sur­veil­lance.

Civil liber­tari­ans have cri­ti­cized him for con­tinu­ing a policy of killing sus­pec­ted ter­ror­ists, rather than ar­rest­ing and try­ing them. These crit­ics come from his own party as well as the liber­tari­an wing of the Re­pub­lic­an Party. Sen. Rand Paul raised his pro­file two years ago with an overnight fili­buster fol­low­ing a drone strike that tar­geted an Amer­ic­an cit­izen. And hu­man-rights act­iv­ists ar­gue that drone strikes of­ten kill in­no­cent ci­vil­ians and wind up cre­at­ing em­pathy for the ter­ror­ist group among the loc­al pop­u­la­tion.

Obama said that the Janu­ary strike was con­duc­ted when of­fi­cials de­term­ined that it was their only real op­tion. “Based on the in­tel­li­gence that we had ob­tained at the time, in­clud­ing hun­dreds of hours of sur­veil­lance, we be­lieved that this was an al-Qaida com­pound, that no ci­vil­ians were present, and that cap­tur­ing these ter­ror­ists was not pos­sible,” he said.

Also killed in that strike was Ahmed Farouq, an Amer­ic­an al-Qaida lead­er, while a second strike that same month killed Adam Gadahn, an Amer­ic­an who be­came an al-Qaida spokes­man. The White House ac­know­ledged in a state­ment that in­tel­li­gence of­fi­cials were not tar­get­ing them, either, and had no idea they were present in the tar­geted loc­a­tions—just as they did not know al-Qaida was hold­ing Wein­stein and Lo Porto in the com­pound where they wound up dy­ing.

What We're Following See More »
Mueller Has Interviewed Press Sec. Sarah Sanders
8 hours ago

"Special counsel Robert Mueller's team has interviewed White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, she told CNN on Friday...The interview is one of the final known interviews by Mueller's team. It was conducted late last year, around the same time as the special counsel interviewed then-White House chief of staff John Kelly, well after a number of other senior officials, including former White House communications director Hope Hicks and former press secretary Sean Spicer, were brought in for questioning."

Gov. Newsom Says California Will Sue Trump Over Emergency Declaration
8 hours ago

"Gov. Gavin Newsom said Friday that California was planning to sue the Trump administration over its declaration of a national emergency on the southern border with Mexico, delivering on a promise state Atty. Gen. Xavier Becerra made last week 'to reject this foolish proposal in court the moment it touches the ground.'...'No other state is going to be impacted by this declaration of emergency more than the state of California,' the governor said. Becerra said attorneys were reviewing the declaration and would develop the legal argument to take to court in the near future."

Trump Signs Border Deal
9 hours ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Stone Under Gag Order
11 hours ago

"A federal judge on Friday ordered Roger Stone, his attorneys and the special counsel’s office to halt all public commentary about the case involving charges that the longtime Donald Trump associate lied to Congress and obstructed its Russia investigation. In a four-page order, U.S. District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson sided with Mueller that Stone and his attorneys 'must refrain from making statements to the media or in public settings that pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
15 hours ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.