The Recession Isn’t Over For Many Families

The number of households with at least one unemployed person is still higher than before the Great Recession.

National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Matt Vasilogambros
April 24, 2015, 10:55 a.m.

Be­ware of the mis­lead­ing stat­ist­ic that says we’ve re­covered from the Great Re­ces­sion.

The Labor De­part­ment re­leased new 2014 fig­ures this week show­ing that the num­ber of fam­il­ies with at least one un­em­ployed per­son dropped by 1.2 mil­lion in the past year, and is now down to 6.5 mil­lion. On its face, this de­vel­op­ment looks prom­ising. But a deep­er look tells a more com­plic­ated and troub­ling story. 

The Wall Street Journ­al on Thursday re­leased a graph that shows while the num­ber of fam­il­ies with at least one un­em­ployed per­son may be de­creas­ing in sheer num­bers, the per­cent­age is still high­er than pre-re­ces­sion levels. In 2014, they made up 8 per­cent of fam­il­ies; in 2006, that fig­ure was only 6.4 per­cent. 

The ra­cial break­down of those num­bers is stark­er. There is still a sub­stan­tial gap between Afric­an Amer­ic­an and Latino house­holds on one end of the scale, and white and Asi­an house­holds on the oth­er. And the num­ber of those house­holds still is lar­ger than it was be­fore 2007.

In a sim­il­ar sense, in­creased job cre­ation and a de­creas­ing un­em­ploy­ment rate (5.5 per­cent as of March) don’t ne­ces­sar­ily mean that the eco­nomy has re­covered from the down­turn. Middle-class wealth re­mains stag­nant, des­pite the massive gains en­joyed by up­per-in­come fam­il­ies.

If Amer­ic­ans aren’t able to amass even small levels of wealth, they’ll be more vul­ner­able the next time an eco­nom­ic down­turn comes along.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.