Here Are Eight Media Questions Hillary Clinton Has Answered During Her Campaign

The Democratic front-runner has largely ignored journalists in the first two weeks of her presidential run, instead speaking directly to voters.

Zach C. Cohen
Add to Briefcase
Zach C. Cohen
April 27, 2015, 11:33 a.m.

When the press corps com­ic­ally sprin­ted across an Iowa lawn in pur­suit of Hil­lary Clin­ton‘s van, they wer­en’t just hop­ing to catch a glimpse of the most-likely Demo­crat­ic pres­id­en­tial nom­in­ee. They were hop­ing to ask Clin­ton ques­tions, and—in the dream scen­ario—get an an­swer.

Those an­swers, however, have been few and far between. Des­pite be­ing bom­barded with press ques­tions at every chance, Clin­ton has only per­son­ally answered a hand­ful of in­quir­ies since form­ally launch­ing her cam­paign April 12. In­stead, she has spoken dir­ectly to voters in Iowa and New Hamp­shire, tak­ing their ques­tions in small-scale events.

Most of the me­dia ques­tions Clin­ton has answered have fo­cused on policy (the ex­act type of in­quiry she re­cently en­cour­aged re­port­ers to fo­cus on). They’ve touched on on­go­ing trans-Pa­cific trade ne­go­ti­ations, cam­paign fin­ance, and for­eign dona­tions to the Clin­ton Found­a­tion.

(RE­LATED: The Proof of the Clin­tons’ Wrong­do­ing

Here are eight she has answered:

Ques­tion 1: “Sec­ret­ary Clin­ton, your re­ac­tion please to these book al­leg­a­tions? Did for­eign en­tit­ies re­ceive any spe­cial treat­ment for mak­ing any kind of dona­tions to the found­a­tion or your hus­band?”—ABC in Keene, New Hamp­shire, April 20Clin­ton: “Well, we’re back in­to the polit­ic­al sea­son, and there­fore we will be sub­jec­ted to all kinds of dis­trac­tion and at­tacks. And I’m ready for that. I know that that comes un­for­tu­nately with the ter­rit­ory. It is, I think, worth not­ing that the Re­pub­lic­ans seem to be talk­ing only about me. I don’t know what they’d talk about if I wer­en’t in the race. But I am in the race, and hope­fully we’ll get on to the is­sues, and I look for­ward to that.”

Ques­tion 2: “…Re­gard­ing the play for pay al­leg­a­tions in the latest book, emails back in 2012.”WMUR, a loc­al ABC af­fil­i­ate in New Hamp­shireClin­ton: “You know, those is­sues are, in my view, dis­trac­tions from what this cam­paign should be about, what I’m go­ing to make this cam­paign about, and I’ll let oth­er people de­cide what they want to talk about. I’m go­ing to talk about what’s hap­pen­ing in the lives of the people of New Hamp­shire and across Amer­ica. Thank you, all.”

(RE­LATED: Iowa Dems are Reel­ing. Can Hil­lary Clin­ton Help?)

Ques­tion 3: WMUR also asked Clin­ton about her early pref­er­ence for small-group meet­ings.Clin­ton: WMUR re­por­ted that she re­spon­ded: “I wasn’t aware of the depth of feel­ing people had about the sub­stance ab­use is­sues. So here again I heard it in New Hamp­shire. So I want people to know that I’m listen­ing, and I’m ac­cess­ible, and I’m run­ning a cam­paign that is about now, that is about the needs of the people of New Hamp­shire. That’s the kind of cam­paign I want to run. And I’m ex­cited to be back here.”

Ques­tion 4: An MS­N­BC re­port­er asked Clin­ton on April 21 wheth­er she had con­cerns about the Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship, a trade agree­ment the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is in the pro­cess of ne­go­ti­at­ing.Clin­ton: Ac­cord­ing to CBS: “Any trade deal has to pro­duce jobs and raise wages and in­crease prosper­ity and pro­tect our se­cur­ity. We have to do our part in mak­ing sure we have the cap­ab­il­it­ies and the skills to be com­pet­it­ive. … It’s got to be really a part­ner­ship between our busi­ness, our gov­ern­ment, our work­force, the in­tel­lec­tu­al prop­erty that comes out of our uni­versit­ies, and we have to get back to a much more fo­cused ef­fort in my opin­ion to try to pro­duce those ca­pa­cit­ies here at home so that we can be com­pet­it­ive in a glob­al eco­nomy.”

(RE­LATED: For Clin­ton, It’s About the Con­cord Mon­it­or, Not the New York Times

Ques­tion 5: In an in­ter­view for print (no tran­script has been made avail­able), The Wash­ing­ton Post ap­par­ently asked a ques­tion about “her cam­paign fin­ance agenda” April 14.Clin­ton: “We do have a plan. We have a plan for my plan. … I’m go­ing to be rolling out a lot of my policies. … Stay tuned.”

Ques­tion 6: Also from the Post, when asked about the role of Pri­or­it­ies USA Ac­tion will play in the 2016 elec­tion:Clin­ton: “I don’t know.”

Ques­tion 7: “Sec­ret­ary Clin­ton, “… hi, how are you, I’m Kristen with NBC News. You lost Iowa in 2008. How do you win this time? What’s your strategy?” — NBC in Le­Claire, Iowa, on April 14.Clin­ton: “I’m hav­ing a great time, can’t look for­ward any more than I am.”

Ques­tion 8: “Sec­ret­ary Clin­ton, what do you think the im­port­ance of the Iowa Caucus will be in the passed and in the up­com­ing elec­tion?” Des Moines Re­gister in Mount Ver­non, Iowa, on April 14.Clin­ton: “I think it’s im­port­ant be­cause it’s the first con­test and I’m look­ing for­ward to get­ting pre­pared for it next Feb­ru­ary.”

Oth­er re­port­ers had ques­tions for Clin­ton that day. She told the as­sembled crowd: “We’ll have lots of time to talk later.”

COR­REC­TION: The ori­gin­al head­line and body of this story mis­stated that Clin­ton answered only eight ques­tions. She has also ad­dressed a num­ber of oth­ers.

Emily Schultheis contributed to this article.
What We're Following See More »
NEVER TRUMP
USA Today Weighs in on Presidential Race for First Time Ever
7 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"By all means vote, just not for Donald Trump." That's the message from USA Today editors, who are making the first recommendation on a presidential race in the paper's 34-year history. It's not exactly an endorsement; they make clear that the editorial board "does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement." But they state flatly that Donald Trump is, by "unanimous consensus of the editorial board, unfit for the presidency."

Source:
COMMISSIONERS NEED TO DELIBERATE MORE
FCC Pushes Vote on Set-Top Boxes
7 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal regulators on Thursday delayed a vote on a proposal to reshape the television market by freeing consumers from cable box rentals, putting into doubt a plan that has pitted technology companies against cable television providers. ... The proposal will still be considered for a future vote. But Tom Wheeler, chairman of the F.C.C., said commissioners needed more discussions."

Source:
UNTIL DEC. 9, ANYWAY
Obama Signs Bill to Fund Government
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
IT’S ALL CLINTON
Reliable Poll Data Coming in RE: Debate #1
14 hours ago
WHY WE CARE
WHAT WILL PASS?
McConnell Doubts Criminal Justice Reform Can Pass This Year
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
×