Forget the 50-State Plan. Clinton’s Building for a Battleground Strategy.

The Democrat’s team is talking about a national network, but its biggest impact will be building the volunteer skills needed elsewhere.

Democratic presidential candidate and former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton speaks at Rancho High School on May 5, 2015 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
National Journal
Emily Schultheis
Add to Briefcase
Emily Schultheis
May 14, 2015, 4 p.m.

Hil­lary Clin­ton has a paid staffer in every state in Amer­ica. But she won’t for much longer.

Her cam­paign’s much-dis­cussed 50-state grass­roots or­gan­iz­ing pro­gram is more a means to an end than the end it­self.

In the short term, it helps her team bol­ster the im­age of the front-run­ner tak­ing ser­i­ously the pos­sib­il­ity of a com­pet­it­ive primary (even if no one else is) while also ad­dress­ing the post-2008 cri­ti­cism that Clin­ton fo­cused too nar­rowly on big primary states, al­low­ing Barack Obama to sweep up del­eg­ates she hadn’t even fought for.

But it yields its great­er be­ne­fit six to 12 months from now, when vo­lun­teers trained in solidly Clin­ton ter­rit­ory, where their ef­forts are un­ne­ces­sary, shift their fo­cus to neigh­bor­ing states where Demo­crats will be fight­ing the Re­pub­lic­an nom­in­ee to cap­ture every middle-of-the-road, un­de­cided voter.

In­deed, though the cam­paign is stress­ing its work to­ward a ro­bust na­tion­wide grass­roots net­work—far more ex­tens­ive than her out­reach ef­forts in 2008—that 50-state net­work will ul­ti­mately be­ne­fit Clin­ton in the same small play­ing field of swing states that pro­pelled Obama to vic­tory in 2008 and 2012.

And not for noth­ing. With an in­creas­ingly po­lar­ized elect­or­ate, the num­ber of states that will prove de­cis­ive to Clin­ton on Elec­tion Night 2016 could total as few as sev­en and cer­tainly no more than 12.

While the team might not talk about a battle­ground ap­proach now, its tac­tics will soon re­flect that strategy. The paid staffers who have been de­ployed to every state around the coun­try are work­ing for the cam­paign on a tem­por­ary basis; at the end of May, the cam­paign ex­pects vo­lun­teers to take over loc­al op­er­a­tions.

Ul­ti­mately, the vo­lun­teer struc­tures they leave in place be­hind them will be to sup­ple­ment ef­forts of vo­lun­teers in con­tested ter­rit­ory—both in key primary states and gen­er­al-elec­tion battle­grounds.

“Staffers in those [blue] states provide a tre­mend­ous amount of vo­lun­teer out­put in­to neigh­bor­ing battle­ground states that can have a huge im­pact,” said Mitch Stew­art, a found­ing part­ner at 270 Strategies who served as the battle­ground-states dir­ect­or for Pres­id­ent Obama’s reelec­tion cam­paign. Stew­art ad­vised the pro-Clin­ton su­per PAC Ready for Hil­lary in the lead-up to Clin­ton’s 2016 an­nounce­ment.

“States like Nevada and Col­or­ado—we had a lot of vo­lun­teers call­ing in­to those two states,” Stew­art said, cit­ing New York (help­ing out with Pennsylvania) and Mas­sachu­setts (help­ing with New Hamp­shire) as oth­er less-com­pet­it­ive states that proved help­ful for vo­lun­teer man­power.

In 2012, Obama’s reelec­tion cam­paign had just 10 “battle­ground” states with a full-fledged staff: Wis­con­sin, Pennsylvania, Iowa, New Hamp­shire, Ohio, Vir­gin­ia, North Car­o­lina, Flor­ida, Nevada, and Col­or­ado. There were an ad­di­tion­al three that were con­sidered “watch” states: Min­nesota, Michigan, and Wash­ing­ton state. That didn’t mean that oth­er states went un­noticed, es­pe­cially with or­gan­izers for Or­gan­iz­ing for Amer­ica sta­tioned across the coun­try—but they didn’t have the same kind of fully staffed op­er­a­tions that the swing states did.

Already, some polit­ic­al pro­fes­sion­als see an even more tar­geted map for 2016. (Larry Sabato and his team as­ser­ted last week that there are just sev­en toss-up states this cycle: Nevada, Col­or­ado, Iowa, Ohio, Vir­gin­ia, Flor­ida, and New Hamp­shire.)

Cer­tainly, the 50-state net­work would be use­ful if Clin­ton gets a real chal­lenge in the primary sea­son—from former Mary­land Gov. Mar­tin O’Mal­ley, for ex­ample. And when states start to be­gin al­low­ing cam­paigns to col­lect sig­na­tures to get on the bal­lot, the vo­lun­teer op­er­a­tions in place will en­sure that Clin­ton’s cam­paign is pre­pared for bal­lot ac­cess across the map—an is­sue that haunted some less-or­gan­ized Re­pub­lic­an can­did­ates in 2012.

It’s also a way for Clin­ton’s cam­paign to make good on its prom­ise to help build up loc­al and state parties, many of which are strug­gling in the post-Cit­izens United cam­paign world. Clin­ton’s team is already put­ting in sig­ni­fic­ant work in Iowa, for ex­ample, where 2014 losses have Demo­crats wor­ried about the fu­ture of the state party; her vo­lun­teer struc­tures, even in non­swing states, will be a boost to loc­al party op­er­a­tions.

Plus, some Demo­crats ar­gue, even states that aren’t com­pet­it­ive now could be more so down the line, so hav­ing pres­id­en­tial-level op­er­at­ives con­nect with and train vo­lun­teers across the coun­try could help pre­pare Demo­crats for fu­ture con­tests. That’s es­pe­cially true of states with grow­ing Latino pop­u­la­tions, such as Geor­gia, Texas, and Ari­zona, which could someday shift away from Re­pub­lic­ans.

“[Clin­ton] is run­ning not just for 2016, but for 2020 and to set up 2024,” said Demo­crat­ic poll­ster Celinda Lake. “Those are states that could be in play by 2020 or 2024.”

In­deed, if the 50-state or­gan­iz­ing ef­fort is meant to ac­com­plish any­thing, it’s cer­tainly not in se­cur­ing Clin­ton’s win in Con­necti­c­ut.

What We're Following See More »
Congressional Budget Office Scores House Trumpcare Bill
8 hours ago

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has released its score of the House-passed American Health Care Act, which would replace Obamacare. According to the CBO, the bill would reduce the deficit by $119 billion by 2026, while leaving 14 million more Americans uninsured in 2018 than under current law, a number swelling to 23 million by 2026. Further, insurance premiums would balloon 20 percent in 2018 and five percent in 2019 before the waiver provision in the legislation would kick in. The provision allows states to apply for waivers and permit insurers to offer skimpier plans, which would likely entice younger and healthier individuals to buy health insurance while potentially pricing older and less healthy Americans out of insurance plans. House Republicans approved this bill in late April without waiting for the CBO score.

Graham Rejects Trump’s Budget In Hearing
8 hours ago

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham said Wednesday during a Senate Appropriations subcommittee hearing that President Donald Trump's budget is little more than recycling bin material. "The budget proposed by the president doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of passing," Graham said. Graham had previously opposed the budget over its nearly 30 percent cut to the budget of the State Department. The budget slashes spending on domestic priorities while increasing military spending.

Ethics Cops Clear Mueller to Work on Trump Case
1 days ago

"Former FBI Director Robert Mueller has been cleared by U.S. Department of Justice ethics experts to oversee an investigation into possible collusion between then-candidate Donald Trump's 2016 election campaign and Russia." Some had speculated that the White House would use "an ethics rule limiting government attorneys from investigating people their former law firm represented" to trip up Mueller's appointment. Jared Kushner is a client of Mueller's firm, WilmerHale. "Although Mueller has now been cleared by the Justice Department, the White House may still use his former law firm's connection to Manafort and Kushner to undermine the findings of his investigation, according to two sources close to the White House."

Senate Intel to Subpoena Two of Flynn’s Businesses
1 days ago

Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Richard Burr (R-NC) and ranking member Mark Warner (D-VA) will subpoena two businesses owned by former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn. Burr said, "We would like to hear from General Flynn. We'd like to see his documents. We'd like him to tell his story because he publicly said he had a story to tell."

Brennan Saw Russia Intelligence “Worthy” of Investigation
1 days ago

At an open hearing of the House Intelligence Committee, former CIA chief John Brennan said he saw information on Trump-Russia contacts that were worth a further look. "Having been involved in many counterintelligence cases in the past, I know what the Russians do. They try to suborn individuals," Brennan said. "And they try to get individuals, including U.S. persons, to act on their behalf, whether wittingly or unwittingly. And I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons, and so therefore by the time I left office ... I had unresolved questions in my mind."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.