Edward Snowden: Rand Paul’s ‘Filibuster’ Is a ‘Sea Change’

The ex-spy answered Reddit users’ questions about NSA reform Thursday.

Edward Snowden's proof to Reddit users that he is who says he is.
National Journal
Add to Briefcase
Emma Roller
May 21, 2015, 10:13 a.m.

With a little help from his friends at the Amer­ic­an Civil Liber­ties Uni­on, Ed­ward Snowden con­duc­ted a Red­dit “Ask Me Any­thing” ses­sion Thursday af­ter­noon. The ex-spy spoke about re­forms to the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency and the Pat­ri­ot Act. Sec­tion 215 of the act, which the NSA uses as the leg­al jus­ti­fic­a­tion for the data col­lec­tion pro­gram that Snowden re­vealed two years ago, is set to ex­pire June 1 un­less Con­gress ex­tends it.

In his an­swers, he ex­pressed sig­ni­fic­ant skep­ti­cism that the U.S. gov­ern­ment will stop spy­ing on its cit­izens al­to­geth­er, but still en­cour­aged users to call their mem­ber of Con­gress and urge them to vote against the Pat­ri­ot Act ex­ten­sion.

He also answered ques­tions ran­ging from his take on Sen. Rand Paul’s re­cent self-de­scribed fili­buster, to the state of Rus­si­an cuisine, to his fa­vor­ite book. Some of his replies are high­lighted be­low.  

Q: What’re your thoughts on Rand Paul’s fili­buster against the re­new­al of the Pat­ri­ot Act?

A: It rep­res­ents a sea change from a few years ago, when in­trus­ive new sur­veil­lance laws were passed without any kind of mean­ing­ful op­pos­i­tion or de­bate. Whatever you think about Rand Paul or his polit­ics, it’s im­port­ant to re­mem­ber that when he took the floor to say “No” to any length of reau­thor­iz­a­tion of the Pat­ri­ot Act, he was speak­ing for the ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans—more than 60% of whom want to see this kind of mass sur­veil­lance re­formed or ended.

He was joined by sev­er­al oth­er sen­at­ors who dis­agree with the Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity lead­er’s ef­forts to sneak through a reau­thor­iz­a­tion of what courts just weeks ago de­clared was a com­pre­hens­ively un­law­ful pro­gram, and if you no­tice that yours did not take to the floor with him, you should call them right now and ask them to vote against any ex­ten­sion of the Pat­ri­ot Act, be­cause right now it looks like they’re go­ing to force the reau­thor­iz­a­tion vote to oc­cur dur­ing the dark of a hol­i­day week­end.

Q: Even if Sec­tion 215 is not re­newed, do you be­lieve that the NSA/U.S. gov­ern­ment will still ac­com­plish phone sur­veil­lance without ap­prov­al and in secret?

A: There are al­ways reas­ons to be con­cerned that re­gard­less of the laws passed, some agen­cies in gov­ern­ment (FBI, NSA, CIA, and DEA, for ex­ample, have flouted laws in the past) will mis­con­true the in­tent of Con­gress in passing lim­it­ing laws—or simply dis­reg­ard them totally. For ex­ample, the DOJ’s in­tern­al watch­dog, the Of­fice of the In­spect­or Gen­er­al (OIG) re­leased a re­port claim­ing, among oth­er ab­uses, that it could simply re­fuse to tell gov­ern­ment over­sight bod­ies what ex­actly it was do­ing, so the leg­al­ity or il­leg­al­ity of their op­er­a­tions simply couldn’t be ques­tioned at all.

However, that’s no ex­cuse for the pub­lic or Con­gress to turn a blind eye to un­law­ful or im­mor­al op­er­a­tions—and the kind of mass sur­veil­lance hap­pen­ing un­der Sec­tion 215 of the Pat­ri­ot Act right now is very much un­law­ful: the Courts ruled just two weeks ago that not only are these activ­it­ies il­leg­al, but they have been since the day the pro­grams began.

Q: In your opin­ion, do you think that a ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­an Cit­izens care enough that they will call Con­gress and sign pe­ti­tions? I think a large is­sue in Amer­ica is Polit­ic­al Apathy.

A: Jameel [Jaf­fer, deputy leg­al dir­ect­or of the ACLU] prob­ably has a bet­ter an­swer, but we know from very re­cent, non-par­tis­an polling that Amer­ic­ans (and every­one else around the world) care tre­mend­ously about mass sur­veil­lance.

The more cent­ral ques­tion, from my per­spect­ive, is “why don’t law­makers seem to care?” After all, the en­tire reas­on they are in of­fice in our sys­tem is to rep­res­ent our views. The re­cent Prin­ceton Study on politi­cians’ re­spons­ive­ness to the policy pref­er­ences of dif­fer­ent sec­tions of so­ci­ety gives some in­dic­a­tion of where things might be go­ing wrong:

Out of all groups ex­press­ing a policy pref­er­ence with­in so­ci­ety, the views of the pub­lic at large are giv­en the very least weight, where­as those of eco­nom­ic elites (think bankers, lob­by­ists, and the people on the Board of Dir­ect­ors at de­fense con­tract­ing com­pan­ies) ex­er­cise more than ten times as much in­flu­ence on what laws get passed — and what laws don’t.

Q: Whats your opin­ion about the UK gov­ern­ment giv­ing GCHQ spies im­munity from anti-hack­ing laws and does that make them worse than the NSA?

I think it’s re­veal­ing that the UK gov­ern­ment has chosen to change the law without any de­bate or pub­lic de­clar­a­tion. It’s a clear red flag.

Q: What do you think about the rise of en­cryp­ted mes­saging apps like Threema and Bleep by Bit­tor­rent? Which (if any) would you re­com­mend? Also, read any good books lately?

Sig­nal for iOS, Red­phone/TextSe­cure for An­droid.

I have a spe­cial fond­ness for “Secrets,” by Daniel Ells­berg.

* * *

Red­dit users also had some soul-search­ing ques­tions for Snowden.

“Do you miss pizza?” one user asked.

“This guy gets it,” Snowden re­spon­ded. “Rus­sia has Papa John’s. For real.”

“Sorry, I just had to ask, but, Mr. Snowden, dur­ing the in­ter­view with John Oliv­er, was that really a pic­ture of his junk in that folder?” an­oth­er user asked.

Snowden simply replied with an am­bigu­ous emoticon.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.