Innovators

Phoenix Makes a Play to Become An R&D Powerhouse

The Greater Phoenix Area, once an epicenter for the foreclosure crisis, now wants to become a hub for software, engineering, and research.

National Journal
Nancy Cook
Add to Briefcase
Nancy Cook
May 27, 2015, 7:53 a.m.

In the years fol­low­ing the Great Re­ces­sion, politi­cians, busi­ness lead­ers, and eco­nom­ists throughout the Great­er Phoenix area did some soul-search­ing about the state of the loc­al eco­nomy. Phoenix had been hard hit by the burst­ing of the hous­ing bubble, shed­ding more than 300,000 jobs in hous­ing, real es­tate, and con­struc­tion be­gin­ning in 2008. What eco­nom­ic growth the re­gion did ex­per­i­ence over the last two dec­ades came from pop­u­la­tion growth in­stead of real eco­nom­ic activ­ity, ac­cord­ing to an ana­lys­is done by the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion’s Met­ro­pol­it­an Policy Pro­gram.

Loc­al of­fi­cials knew that they needed to find a new path for the re­gion­al eco­nomy: a long-term strategy to boost growth, wages, and pro­ductiv­ity for the re­gion’s roughly 4.3 mil­lion res­id­ents. That strategy, they de­cided, would come from trans­form­ing Phoenix in­to a loc­al hub for re­search and de­vel­op­ment by build­ing off the re­gion’s ex­ist­ing ad­vanced man­u­fac­tur­ing, aerospace, and de­fense in­dus­tries. The trans­form­a­tion is still in its nas­cent stage, ex­pec­ted to take hold over the next five to 10 years.

Na­tion­al Journ­al spoke with Kath­leen Lee, vice pres­id­ent of re­search and strategy for the Great­er Phoenix Eco­nom­ic Coun­cil, about the re­gion’s new plans, loc­ally nick­named “Ve­lo­city.” Ed­ited ex­cerpts of the con­ver­sa­tion fol­low.

Tell me what Phoenix was like after the Great Re­ces­sion.

The en­tire na­tion was in a deep re­ces­sion, and Phoenix was one of the places hit hard. We had some sig­ni­fic­ant down­turns in the hous­ing mar­ket. Our pop­u­la­tion growth slowed down be­cause there was no real mi­gra­tion hap­pen­ing na­tion­ally. Like oth­er places, we had a high un­em­ploy­ment rate at the time as well. We’re in a re­cov­ery mode right now—al­most 85 per­cent re­covered. The ef­forts around Ve­lo­city came out of that point in time, when the re­gion really star­ted look­ing at oth­er in­nov­at­ive strategies to sus­tain eco­nom­ic growth over the long haul.

So how did Phoenix of­fi­cials come up with the idea to turn the re­gion in­to a hub for re­search and de­vel­op­ment?

When the re­ces­sion hit, we star­ted to look at our eco­nomy. We looked at our top met­rics and dug deep­er in­to the as­pects of our eco­nomy in terms of our in­dus­tries, in­nov­a­tion, and en­tre­pren­eur­i­al ca­pa­cit­ies. We did an as­sess­ment and looked at where the po­ten­tial op­por­tun­it­ies were. Out of that work were the three strategies from our eco­nom­ic growth plan.

But why fo­cus spe­cific­ally on re­search and de­vel­op­ment? It seems like every city now wants to mas­ter this.

Cer­tainly, the glob­al eco­nomy is driv­en by know­ledge sec­tors. In any eco­nomy, if you really want to con­tin­ue to see eco­nom­ic growth and really see the cre­ation of good jobs, you need to fo­cus on pro­ductiv­ity and in­nov­a­tion. For sev­er­al dec­ades, be­cause we were such a high-growth area, I think a lot of people for­got that we have a really strong in­dus­tri­al base and elec­tron­ics and semi­con­duct­ors and oth­er re­lated in­dus­tries. That in­dustry base is already es­tab­lished here.

In or­der for us to really look at how our in­dus­tries will per­form over time around these new tech­no­logy areas, we need to have more re­search and de­vel­op­ment cap­ab­il­it­ies. Re­lated to that will be the know­ledge and skilled work­force that can sup­port that type of growth. That is why we landed on that.

I nev­er really knew that Phoenix already had an in­dus­tri­al base. What does that look like?

In our re­gion, we spe­cial­ize in aerospace and de­fense, semi­con­duct­ors and elec­tron­ics. These are in­dus­tries that were es­tab­lished in the 1950s. The his­tory of these sec­tors is that early com­pan­ies came here and set up op­er­a­tions around re­search and de­vel­op­ment; at the time, there was a lot of work around tech­no­lo­gies geared around de­fense. Those busi­nesses grew in­to large com­pan­ies like Hon­ey­well or In­tel.

Now, what we’re see­ing is that some of these com­pan­ies are look­ing at oth­er kinds of new tech­no­logy areas. So if you look at re­search and de­vel­op­ment in­vest­ments in our re­gion, you see that a sig­ni­fic­ant por­tion of our total re­search and de­vel­op­ment is in private in­dustry. In­tel, for ex­ample, made huge in­vest­ments here. We’re also see­ing a sig­ni­fic­ant amount of com­pan­ies that are soft­ware or in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy com­pan­ies that sup­port, not just con­sumer products, but also man­u­fac­tur­ing and oth­er kinds of in­dus­tries. We’re be­gin­ning to see that kind of in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy and pro­duc­tion get bet­ter in­teg­rated in­to the new type of busi­ness mod­el.

Do you con­sider this a makeover for the Phoenix area?

I wouldn’t say it is a makeover. I would say it’s an ac­cel­er­a­tion of what we already have and build­ing upon those cap­ab­il­it­ies. I think “makeover” im­plies that we’re try­ing to do something en­tirely dif­fer­ent. If you look at oth­er re­gions and places, if you try to do that and you’re not hold­ing on to what you already have, the like­li­hood of suc­ceed­ing will be very dif­fi­cult. We’re build­ing on what we already have and then ad­ja­cent in­dus­tries like soft­ware and in­form­a­tion tech­no­logy are ac­tu­ally grow­ing out of it.

What We're Following See More »
INDICTMENTS NOT PROOF OF COLLUSION
Rosenstein Holds Presser On Russian Indictments
1 days ago
THE DETAILS
Source:
CONTRADICTS TRUMP’S DENIALS
U.S. Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Interference
1 days ago
THE LATEST

The indictment, filed in the District of Columbia, alleges that the interference began "in or around 2014," when the defendants began tracking and studying U.S. social media sites. They "created and controlled numerous Twitter accounts" and "purchased computer servers located inside the United States" to mask their identities, some of which were stolen. The interference was coordinated by election interference "specialists," and focused on the Black Lives Matter movement, immigration, and other divisive issues. "By early to mid-2016" the groups began supporting the campaign of "then-candidate Donald Trump," including by communicating with "unwitting individuals associated with the Trump Campaign..."

Source:
“QUEEN FOR A DAY”
Gates Said to Be Finalizing a Plea Deal
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Trump campaign adviser Rick Gates is finalizing a plea deal with special counsel Robert Mueller's office, indicating he's poised to cooperate in the investigation, according to sources familiar with the case. Gates has already spoken to Mueller's team about his case and has been in plea negotiations for about a month. He's had what criminal lawyers call a 'Queen for a Day' interview, in which a defendant answers any questions from the prosecutors' team, including about his own case and other potential criminal activity he witnessed."

Source:
ZERO-FOR-TWO
Another Defeat for Immigration Legislation in the Senate
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate on Thursday rejected immigration legislation crafted by centrists in both parties after President Trump threatened to veto the bill if it made it to his desk. In a 54-45 vote, the Senate failed to advance the legislation from eight Republican, seven Democratic and one Independent senators. It needed 60 votes to overcome a procedural hurdle. "

Source:
DISPUTE ASSERTION OF EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE
House Intel Panel Could Charge Bannon with Contempt
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"The House Intelligence Committee has scheduled a Thursday meeting to hear testimony from Steve Bannon—but it's an open question whether President Donald Trump's former chief strategist will even show up. The White House sent a letter to Capitol Hill late Wednesday laying out its explanation for why Trump's transition period falls under its authority to assert executive privilege, a move intended to shield Bannon from answering questions about that time period." Both Republicans and Democrats on the committee dispute the White House's theory, and have floated charging Bannon with contempt should he refuse to appear.

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login