Big Pizza Cooks Up Plan to Carve Up Obamacare’s Menu-Labeling Rules

The industry is looking for a change to the FDA regulations mandated by the law.

GLENDALE, CA - JUNE 21: A customer stands at the counter at a Domino's Pizza restaurant on June 21, 2012 in Glendale, California. A group of pizza chains including Domino's, Papa John's, Little Caesars, Godfather's Pizza and Pizza Hut are joining to fight a proposed menu labeling plan that would require them to update and pay for in-store menu boards with nutritional information, arguing that the majority of their customers order over the phone or online. (Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images)
National Journal
May 27, 2015, 4:05 p.m.

Lynn Liddle knows what you’re think­ing. The Dom­ino’s Pizza ex­ec­ut­ive and chair of the Amer­ic­an Pizza Com­munity—D.C. has a trade group for everything—has spent the past few years scrap­ping over Obama­care’s man­date for menu la­beling at fast-food chain res­taur­ants.

You might sus­pect that’s be­cause Dom­ino’s doesn’t want its cus­tom­ers to see how un­healthy the piz­zas they’re eat­ing are. She says you’re wrong—it’s be­cause nobody goes to the phys­ic­al store to or­der piz­zas. So why make those busi­nesses pay for something people won’t see?

The pizza in­dustry lost the ini­tial battle when the Food and Drug Ad­min­is­tra­tion re­leased fi­nal reg­u­la­tions based on the Af­ford­able Care Act’s menu-la­beling pro­vi­sion at the end of last year. Pizza chains were re­quired to post cal­or­ie in­form­a­tion on their in-store menu boards or face civil or crim­in­al pen­al­ties. They, along with the rest of the fast-food sec­tor, must com­ply by Dec. 1 of this year—un­less that dead­line is delayed, as some be­lieve it could be.

This is Big Pizza’s beef: People or­der pizza by phone or on­line. (Liddle pressed this re­port­er on how he pro­cures his pies. Usu­ally through a mo­bile app, for the re­cord.) The in­dustry es­tim­ates that only 10 per­cent—and Liddle said it could be even as low as 2 per­cent—of their cus­tom­ers are ac­tu­ally go­ing to see the cal­or­ie in­form­a­tion that they put up in stores. Be­cause of that, they didn’t ini­tially ex­pect the FDA to man­date cal­or­ie counts on pizza places’ phys­ic­al menus. But that’s what the fi­nal reg­u­la­tion re­quires.

“Very few people walk in­to a pizzer­ia, look up on a menu board and say, ‘Hmm, what will I have?’” Liddle said in an in­ter­view. “We don’t want to not do la­beling. We do it already. We don’t want to get out of it. We want to do it. We want to do it in a way that makes sense for our con­sumers, that they can un­der­stand, and we want to do it in a way that won’t bur­den our small-busi­ness fran­chisees.”

Un­der the FDA rule, Liddle said, the small-busi­ness own­er of a Dom­ino’s fran­chise is go­ing to have to spend a couple thou­sand dol­lars post­ing the in­form­a­tion and it might not even help those se­lect few cus­tom­ers, any­way. Dom­ino’s has 34 mil­lion dif­fer­ent pizza com­bin­a­tions; Liddle be­lieves Pizza Hut has tens of mil­lions more. The in­dustry there­fore ar­gues that nobody is go­ing to get any­thing out of the huge cal­or­ie ranges that its mem­bers are go­ing to have to post on the menus at their stores to cov­er all the pos­sib­il­it­ies and com­ply with the rules.

So the Amer­ic­an Pizza Com­munity thinks it has a solu­tion. It sup­ports a bill in­tro­duced last month by Rep. Cathy Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers, the No. 4 Re­pub­lic­an in the House, and Demo­cract­ic Rep. Lor­etta Sanc­hez that would re­vise the ACA’s menu rules. Res­taur­ants where a ma­jor­ity of or­ders are made off-premises (read: pizza places) could post their cal­or­ie in­form­a­tion on­line to com­ply with the law. That way, the in­dustry ar­gues, cus­tom­ers could get the in­form­a­tion where they’re or­der­ing. Dom­ino’s put out a video last week of cus­tom­ers com­plain­ing about the reg­u­la­tions to try to build some mo­mentum for the le­gis­la­tion.

The bill has 23 oth­er co-spon­sors, but no com­mit­tee hear­ing has been sched­uled yet, so its le­gis­lat­ive fu­ture is un­cer­tain. Mc­Mor­ris Rodgers and Sanc­hez’s of­fices did not re­spond to re­quests for com­ment. Pizza typ­ic­ally isn’t a ma­jor play­er on Cap­it­ol Hill, but Liddle said they were plan­ning a fly-in of pizza ex­ec­ut­ives to break bread with law­makers about the is­sue.

Menu la­beling is “prob­ably our largest le­gis­lat­ive is­sue,” Liddle said. “I think what we’re ask­ing for is not really con­tro­ver­sial “¦ I be­lieve we can get it done.”

They are, however, go­ing to be bat­tling what Liddle said she “lov­ingly call(s) the food po­lice,” the groups and in­di­vidu­als who strongly sup­port Obama­care’s menu rules.

Sara Bleich, an as­so­ci­ate pro­fess­or at Johns Hop­kins Uni­versity who has done re­search on menu la­beling, said that the FDA rules, which were broad­er than many had an­ti­cip­ated, had been “ex­cit­ing from a pub­lic health per­spect­ive.” They brought amuse­ment parks and pre­pared food at gro­cery stores un­der their pur­view, along with the pizza and bur­ger joints.

For now, the gen­er­al con­sensus of the avail­able stud­ies, con­duc­ted in cit­ies such as New York and Seattle that had menu la­beling be­fore Obama­care, is that the policy has lim­ited or no ef­fect on in­di­vidu­al people’s be­ha­vi­or—though there is some counterevid­ence. But their real im­pact, ac­cord­ing to Bleich’s re­search, seems to be that when res­taur­ants are forced to be trans­par­ent about their food, they start mak­ing it health­i­er. She has doc­u­mented a 10 to 12 per­cent de­cline in cal­or­ies at some es­tab­lish­ments since menu-la­beling took ef­fect in U.S. cit­ies.

“The reas­on that is so im­port­ant is that in­di­vidu­al be­ha­vi­or is very res­ist­ant to change,” Bleich said. But if res­taur­ants change in­stead, “that is a huge win for pub­lic health.”

That’s why the “food po­lice” would op­pose the car­ve­out that Big Pizza wants. For one, not all Amer­ic­ans have In­ter­net ac­cess and some there­fore wouldn’t be­ne­fit from the in­dustry’s pro­pos­al. Second, and per­haps more im­port­ant: If the re­search holds, the new­found trans­par­ency will lead to health­i­er pizza re­gard­less of what cus­tom­ers do. That is con­sist­ent with what Obama­care was try­ing to ac­com­plish.

“The counter is ba­sic­ally trans­par­ency. Con­sumers should have uni­form trans­par­ency,” she said. “Put­ting it on a menu board along­side prices is el­ev­at­ing in a way that the In­ter­net is not.”

What We're Following See More »
Criminal Justice Reform Bill Clears Senate
1 hours ago

"The Senate passed a bipartisan criminal justice reform bill on Tuesday night, handing a significant victory to President Trump and senators who lobbied to advance the legislation before the end of the year. Senators voted 87-12 on the legislation, which merges a House-passed prison reform bill aimed at reducing recidivism with a handful of changes to sentencing laws and mandatory minimum prison sentences." The House aims to vote on the measure when it reconvenes later this week.

Judge Delays Flynn Sentencing
6 hours ago

Federal Judge Emmet Sullivan "agreed Tuesday to postpone Michael Flynn’s sentencing after a hearing to decide the punishment for President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser went awry." Sullivan gave Flynn a chance to reconsider his decision to plead guilty, adding that he could not "guarantee a sentence without prison time, even after the special counsel’s office recommended that Flynn not be incarcerated. After a brief recess, Sullivan and prosecutors agreed to delay sentencing so that Flynn could "eke out the last modicum of cooperation."

Ducey To Appoint Martha McSally To Senate
10 hours ago
Is White House Caving on Government Shutdown?
10 hours ago

"White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders seemed to endorse a potential spending deal that would include all of the remaining appropriations, including a Senate Homeland Homeland Security bill with $1.6 billion in wall-related funding. But as usual, there was a catch—President Donald Trump might insist on flexibility to use other funds already identified to get closer to his desired $5 billion."

VOTE IS 82-12
Senate Advances Criminal Justice Reform
10 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.