Six oil and gas giants based in Europe have delivered an unusual joint message to organizers of United Nations climate talks: We want a price on carbon-dioxide emissions.
BP, Shell, Eni, Total, Statoil, and BG Group (a big gas company that Shell is acquiring) announced in a letter to Christiana Figueres, the top U.N. climate official, that they are joining forces for an initiative calling for carbon pricing, which is accomplished through emissions-trading systems or taxes.
Their effort reflects a strategic calculation for the companies that by engaging on the topic, they can help shape climate policies to benefit natural gas, which produces about half the carbon emissions of coal when burned to create electricity. Wider use of carbon pricing worldwide, depending on how stringent the policies, could benefit companies that produce gas and ship it around the globe in liquefied form.
“[T]he need to cut emissions is so essential that we have to pursue all options to lower carbon while providing the energy the world needs to meet demand from a growing population seeking better living standards. Natural gas can help deliver this,” reads a second open letter from the companies released to the press.
Kevin Book of the consulting firm ClearView Energy Partners says the companies are motivated by support for green policies in Europe, where the European Union has a long-established emissions-trading system, and the growing share of natural gas in the oil and gas industry’s reserves.
“If you are both European and gassy, then it is easy to understand the support for a price on carbon,” said Book, ClearView’s managing director.
The letters come as industry officials are meeting in Paris this week for the World Gas Conference.
And they coincide with the latest round of U.N. climate talks in Bonn, Germany ahead of the Paris climate summit that starts in late November, which will be aimed a hashing out a final global climate accord.
The companies—which are headquartered in Europe but have operations worldwide—say they want to “open direct dialogue with the UN and willing governments.”
The companies are calling on governments to introduce national and regional carbon-pricing policies where they don’t already exist, and to create an international framework to eventually link national programs together.
Jason Bordoff, the founding director of the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, said that in addition to interest in gas, there’s a recognition by major companies that they need to engage on climate policy.
“I think given how quickly nations are beginning to move to address climate change, given how public opinion on the issue is rapidly shifting, and how much pressure is coming from the public for greater action from the energy companies that produce fossil fuels that are responsible for the vast majority of carbon emissions, I think many—clearly not all—but many large energy companies are realizing that they need to proactively engage in the conversation about what the solution to climate change is going to be,” said Bordoff, who was a senior energy and climate aide at the National Security Council under President Obama.
Big U.S.-based oil and gas companies like Exxon, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips are not part of the initiative.
The European companies say that carbon pricing benefits the industry in the long term by helping to provide certainty and policy stability.
“Pricing carbon obviously adds a cost to our production and our products—but carbon pricing policy frameworks will contribute to provide our businesses and their many stakeholders with a clear roadmap for future investment, a level playing field for all energy sources across geographies and a clear role in securing a more sustainable future,” the letter to Figueres states.
The letter notes that carbon pricing can help drive use of gas as a replacement for coal. But while the companies are promoting the role of natural gas in climate policy, they say that carbon pricing will benefit several technologies, including energy efficiency in buildings, renewables, carbon-capture and storage, and low-pollution cars.
The World Bank tracks (and promotes) carbon pricing, and a late May Bank report notes growth in the practice.
“In the past year and a half, Portugal and Mexico implemented new carbon taxes, South Korea started one of the world’s largest emissions trading systems, and California and Quebec linked their cap-and-trade systems, which Ontario plans to join,” states the Bank’s updated guide to nations with carbon pricing.
While promoting gas, the companies say they are not seeking “special treatment” for any fuel in their push for widespread carbon pricing worldwide.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.