Is The Anti-Common Core Movement Just ‘Suburban White Moms’?

As opposition grows, so does the civil rights debate over testing.

National Journal
June 2, 2015, 4 p.m.

On a Monday morn­ing in March, sev­er­al hun­dred Al­buquerque (New Mex­ico) High School stu­dents walked out of their first peri­od classes and onto the grounds in front of school. Des­pite warn­ings from school lead­ers that they could lose the chance to walk in gradu­ation ce­re­mon­ies by par­ti­cip­at­ing in the protest, stu­dents chanted slo­gans and held up hand­made signs with mes­sages like, “We are not defined by test scores” and “We have a say in our edu­ca­tion.” 

They were protest­ing new state tests aligned to the Com­mon Core aca­dem­ic stand­ards. “This test is in­fringing on our rights,” says Maya Quinones, a seni­or and one of the protest or­gan­izers. Most of the stu­dents at Al­buquerque High School are His­pan­ic and come from low-in­come fam­il­ies. 

Edu­ca­tion Sec­ret­ary Arne Duncan fam­ously singled out “white sub­urb­an moms” for their op­pos­i­tion to the Com­mon Core and the tests as­so­ci­ated with it. But many low-in­come, minor­ity com­munit­ies aren’t sold on the new stand­ards, either. Skep­ti­cism in those com­munit­ies chal­lenges a key ar­gu­ment for why such stand­ard­ized tests ex­ist in the first place.

A ten­sion has emerged between na­tion­al civil rights groups, which gen­er­ally sup­port the Com­mon Core and be­lieve stand­ard­ized tests can help pro­mote equity, and grass­roots act­iv­ists, who say par­ents and stu­dents have a right to re­fuse to par­ti­cip­ate in state tests they don’t be­lieve in.

Sup­port­ers of test re­fus­al “claim a false mantle of civil rights act­iv­ism,” twelve civil rights or­gan­iz­a­tions said in a state­ment last month. When par­ents “opt-out” of state tests, the state­ment said, they un­der­mine ef­forts to im­prove schools for all chil­dren.

To un­der­stand the de­bate, it helps to un­der­stand the civil rights lo­gic that un­der­girded the 2002 fed­er­al law No Child Left Be­hind. “The story of chil­dren be­ing just shuffled through the sys­tem is one of the sad­dest stor­ies of Amer­ica,” then-Pres­id­ent George W. Bush said when he signed the law. Law­makers wanted to hold schools ac­count­able for every child’s pro­gress, re­gard­less of that child’s back­ground.

So No Child Left Be­hind re­quired states to reg­u­larly test all chil­dren in math and read­ing, and to sep­ar­ate out scores by stu­dent char­ac­ter­ist­ics such as race and dis­ab­il­ity status. States had to take ac­tion when chil­dren in any demo­graph­ic failed to meet learn­ing goals.

The Com­mon Core builds on the same lo­gic. In 2009, a group of ex­perts, backed by state gov­ernors and found­a­tions, cre­ated a set of learn­ing goals they thought bet­ter aligned with the skills stu­dents need to suc­ceed in col­lege and the work­force. Today, 43 states have ad­op­ted the stand­ards, and chil­dren in most of those states took Com­mon Core-aligned tests this spring.

Yet the Com­mon Core has proved in­cred­ibly con­tro­ver­sial—even more con­tro­ver­sial than No Child Left Be­hind. There’s something in the stand­ards for both Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans to hate, from the col­lec­tion of private stu­dent data to the loss of loc­al con­trol. Al­most all the Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial can­did­ates—with the ex­cep­tion of former Flor­ida gov­ernor Jeb Bush—op­pose the stand­ards.

Op­pon­ents say U.S. chil­dren take too many stand­ard­ized tests, they don’t meas­ure learn­ing well, and the new stand­ards aren’t age-ap­pro­pri­ate. Quinones thinks the tests aren’t fair to bi­lin­gual stu­dents. “The lan­guage that’s used—it’s something that we’re not used to, it’s not the lit­er­at­ure we grew up read­ing,” she says.

The most damning anti-test­ing ar­gu­ment, from a civil rights per­spect­ive, is the fact that while test scores have ris­en, achieve­ment gaps have barely budged since No Child Left Be­hind was passed. White and Asi­an chil­dren still earn high­er scores on stand­ard­ized tests, on av­er­age, than Afric­an-Amer­ic­an and Latino chil­dren do. Rich kids con­sist­ently earn high­er scores than poor kids.

Rita Green, edu­ca­tion chair for the Seattle King County NAACP, has re­searched the is­sue, and con­vinced her branch to defy the NAACP’s na­tion­al stance and em­brace the opt-out move­ment. “The money they spend on those tests should be put in the classroom,” Green says.

So far, much of the loudest op­pos­i­tion to the Com­mon Core has come from white, sub­urb­an com­munit­ies such as Long Is­land, New York and Douglas County, Col­or­ado. Polls sug­gest that white par­ents are more skep­tic­al of the stand­ards than black and Latino par­ents.

A 2013 As­so­ci­ated Press-NORC poll, for ex­ample, found that 62 per­cent of His­pan­ic par­ents and 64 per­cent of black par­ents be­lieve the Com­mon Core will im­prove schools, com­pared to 40 per­cent of white par­ents. Minor­ity par­ents were much more likely to say stand­ard­ized test scores were a good meas­ure of their child’s per­form­ance and of school qual­ity.

Such data shows that minor­ity par­ents un­der­stand the value of reg­u­lar test­ing and the new stand­ards, some edu­ca­tion ad­voc­ates say. Low opt-out rates in New York’s large, di­verse cit­ies “tells us something power­ful,” Steve Sig­mund, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of High Achieve­ment New York, and Arva Rice, pres­id­ent and CEO of the New York Urb­an League, re­cently wrote in an op-ed for the New York Daily News. “For far too long, too many minor­ity stu­dents were al­lowed to slip through the cracks of our edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem, and the as­sess­ments are an im­port­ant tool in chan­ging the game.”

But Com­mon Core op­pos­i­tion isn’t re­stric­ted to a single ra­cial or eth­nic group, as act­iv­ists such as Quinones and Green prove. And the poll data could re­flect cul­tur­al dif­fer­ences, or power im­bal­ances, rather than a firm be­lief that the tests help en­sure edu­ca­tion­al equity. The AP-NORC poll also found that Amer­ic­ans with lower levels of edu­ca­tion were more likely to sup­port stand­ard­ized test­ing. 

Green says that in her ex­per­i­ence, minor­ity par­ents tend not to ag­gress­ively en­gage with schools. Im­mig­rants, in par­tic­u­lar, may be con­fused by lan­guage bar­ri­ers or may come from a cul­ture where par­ents de­fer to teach­ers’ de­cisions.

“There’s a dif­fer­ence between an in­volved par­ent and an en­gaged par­ent,” Green says. “The in­volved par­ent goes to the dif­fer­ent events, to sup­port the fun­draisers, etc. But an en­gaged par­ent? They ques­tion the school budget. They ques­tion the books that are be­ing used. They ques­tion the pro­grams that are be­ing used in school.”

Both Com­mon Core op­pon­ents, like Green, and Com­mon Core sup­port­ers in the civil rights com­munity want to see minor­ity par­ents get more en­gaged. But the sup­port­ers would like to see par­ents seize test score data and use it to fight for bet­ter teach­ers, more fund­ing, and school im­prove­ments.

“We’ve got to get people to clearly un­der­stand—they’ve got to ad­voc­ate for us to get equity,” says Glor­ia Sweet-Love, pres­id­ent of the Ten­ness­ee State Con­fer­ence NAACP. The par­ents she talks to tend to say their kids take too many tests, and ex­press a cer­tain fa­tigue about the latest test-based re­form ef­fort. Test­ing alone won’t fix the achieve­ment gap, Sweet-Love tells them. But ad­vocacy fueled by test score data can push com­munit­ies to ad­dress it.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Signs Border Deal
2 days ago

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Trump Declares National Emergency
3 days ago

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
3 days ago

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
3 days ago

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

House Passes Funding Deal
3 days ago

"The House passed a massive border and budget bill that would avert a shutdown and keep the government funded through the end of September. The Senate passed the measure earlier Thursday. The bill provides $1.375 billion for fences, far short of the $5.7 billion President Trump had demanded to fund steel walls. But the president says he will sign the legislation, and instead seek to fund his border wall by declaring a national emergency."


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.