Barack Obama Wants You to Think the Obamacare Lawsuit Is Ridiculous

President says the Supreme Court probably shouldn’t have even taken up the King v. Burwell case.

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: U.S. President Barack Obama delivers speaks at the 2013 Tribal Nations Conference held at the Department of Interior Building on November 13, 2013 in Washington, DC. Obama meet with leaders of 566 Native American tribes earlier in the day at teh White House.
National Journal
June 8, 2015, 7:43 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Barack Obama sought Monday to por­tray the latest law­suit against the Af­ford­able Care Act as base­less lit­ig­a­tion foun­ded in polit­ic­al an­im­us—and warned that a Su­preme Court rul­ing against his ad­min­is­tra­tion, which could come any day, would be dev­ast­at­ing.

Speak­ing after the G-7 meet­ing in Ger­many, Obama em­ployed some of his strongest rhet­or­ic to date to pree­mpt­ively cast the case—and, by ex­ten­sion, any Court rul­ing for the plaintiffs—as fraud­u­lent.

He even sug­ges­ted that the high Court should have nev­er taken up the law­suit in the first place, a re­flec­tion of the White House’s frus­tra­tion that, five years in and mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans covered, the law is still fight­ing to se­cure its le­git­im­acy.

The pres­id­ent said it was “well doc­u­mented” that Con­gress in­ten­ded for ACA’s sub­sidies to be avail­able in every state, re­gard­less of wheth­er the state or fed­er­al gov­ern­ment op­er­ated its in­sur­ance ex­change. But the law’s op­pon­ents dis­agree, cit­ing some spe­cif­ic word­ing in the stat­ute it­self, and now the Court will de­cide the mat­ter in the com­ing weeks.

If it rules against the ad­min­is­tra­tion, more than 6 mil­lion people could lose their fin­an­cial aid provided by the law.

“The re­cord makes it clear, and, un­der well-es­tab­lished stat­utory in­ter­pret­a­tion ap­proaches that have been re­peatedly em­ployed not just by lib­er­al Demo­crat­ic judges but by con­ser­vat­ive judges like some on the cur­rent Su­preme Court, you in­ter­pret the stat­ute based on what the in­tent and mean­ing and the over­all struc­ture of the stat­ute provides for,” Obama said.

“So this should be an easy case. Frankly, it prob­ably shouldn’t have been taken up,” he con­tin­ued. “Since we’re go­ing to get a rul­ing pretty quick, I think it’s im­port­ant for us to go ahead and as­sume that the Su­preme Court is go­ing to do what most leg­al schol­ars who’ve looked at this would ex­pect them to do.”

Obama al­luded to the in­sur­ance mar­ket “death spir­al”—healthy people drop­ping out of the ex­changes if they lose their sub­sidies, leav­ing only the sick con­tinu­ing to buy in­sur­ance, which would drive up prices, and rinse and re­peat—the the ad­min­is­tra­tion has long warned would fol­low an ad­verse Court de­cision.

“It would be dis­rupt­ive. Not just, by the way, for folks in the ex­changes, but for those in­sur­ance mar­kets in those states gen­er­ally. It’s a bad idea,” he said. “It’s not something that should be done based on a twis­ted in­ter­pret­a­tion of four words in—as we were re­minded re­peatedly—a couple-thou­sand-page piece of le­gis­la­tion.”

But if the Court didn’t “play it straight” with its rul­ing, as Obama put it, the pres­id­ent placed the re­spons­ib­il­ity for fix­ing the prob­lem with Cap­it­ol Hill. Oth­er­wise, stick­ing to the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s long-stand­ing po­s­i­tion, he in­dic­ated there isn’t much the ex­ec­ut­ive branch could do.

“I’m op­tim­ist­ic that the Su­preme Court will play it straight when it comes to in­ter­pret­a­tion,” he said. “And I should men­tion if it didn’t, Con­gress could fix this whole thing with a one-sen­tence pro­vi­sion.”

“If some­body does something that doesn’t make any sense, it’s hard to fix,” Obama con­cluded. “And this would be hard to fix.”

What We're Following See More »
AFTER LOSING COURT BATTLE
Betsy DeVos To Cancel $150 Million In Student Debt
3 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration ... will cancel thousands of borrowers’ federal student loans, carrying out an Obama-era policy that Education Secretary Betsy DeVos had fought to kill. The move comes as DeVos is being forced to implement a package of regulations that created more protections for student loan borrowers who were affected by a school closure or defrauded by their college. The Education Department ... will cancel the loans of about 15,000 borrowers" who applied for relief, totaling approximately $150 million.

Source:
DOWN 12% FR0M LAST YEAR
ACA Enrollment Season Could Be Worst Ever
23 minutes ago
THE DETAILS

"The window to purchase ACA coverage for 2019 closes on Saturday. So far, the number of people signing up through HealthCare.gov, the main enrollment portal, is down about 12% from the same time last year—and last year was down slightly from the year before that." The possible reasons: lack of marketing support by the government, the robust employment numbers, and the expansion of cheap, bare-bones plans.

Source:
FIGHTING HAS LASTED THREE MONTHS
U.S.-Backed Forces Take Last ISIS-Held City in Syria
57 minutes ago
THE LATEST

"U.S.-backed, Kurdish-led fighters captured the last town held by the Islamic State group on Friday, after days of intense battles in the militants' single remaining enclave in eastern Syria, activists said. The fall of Hajin is a blow to the extremists. The town was their main stronghold in the last pocket of land they control in eastern Syria, near the Iraqi border. ISIS still holds some villages nearby."

Source:
DOMESTIC CONSUMPTION SLOWING
China To Remove Retaliatory Tariffs On American Cars
1 hours ago
THE LATEST

China has confirmed "it will remove the retaliatory duty on automobiles imported from" the United States, starting on January 1. Tariffs will be reduced "to 15 percent from the current 40 percent, in line with what other countries pay ... The temporary tax reduction for U.S. car imports comes as China heads for its very first annual vehicle sales decline in 28 years amid the trade war and an economic slowdown that’s undermining consumption momentum."

Source:
FOR IMPROPER SPENDING, INFLUENCE
Trump Inauguration Spending Now Under Investigation
16 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Federal prosecutors in Manhattan are investigating whether President Trump’s 2017 inaugural committee misspent some of the record $107 million it raised from donations, people familiar with the matter said. The criminal probe by the Manhattan U.S. attorney’s office, which is in its early stages, also is examining whether some of the committee’s top donors gave money in exchange for access to the incoming Trump administration, policy concessions or to influence official administration positions."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login