Are Conscientious Student-Loan Defaulters a Threat?

Some think defaulting on student loans might be the new draft-card burning, and could force the government to address rising tuition and $1.2 trillion in student debt.

National Journal
J. Weston Phippen
Add to Briefcase
J. Weston Phippen
June 23, 2015, 11:58 a.m.

A group of stu­dents called the Cor­inthi­an 100 pur­pose­fully de­faul­ted on their stu­dent loans. It was a play to protest Cor­inthi­an Col­leges, a private, for-profit school chain that has been called pred­at­ory and has been ac­cused of mis­lead­ing low-in­come stu­dents in­to con­sid­er­able debt for de­grees that some have called worth­less. The protest worked. On June 8, the gov­ern­ment an­nounced that it would for­give the stu­dents’ loans.

Each year, tu­ition rises at private and pub­lic col­leges, as does the amount of debt stu­dents carry with them after gradu­ation. So while the Cor­inthi­an stu­dents had some­what unique cir­cum­stances (for-profit de­grees have re­cently come un­der at­tack), their de­fi­ance raises the ques­tion: What if hun­dreds of thou­sands or even mil­lions of stu­dents de­faul­ted on their loans as a form of protest—a massive move­ment to “burn” the promis­sory note?

An­drew Ross, a pro­fess­or at New York Uni­versity, wants people to do just this.

“It’s a wide­spread con­sensus that this is a huge crisis for fu­ture gen­er­a­tions,” Ross says.

Ross was an early mem­ber of the Oc­cupy Wall Street move­ment. He is the au­thor of a book called Cred­ito­cracy: And the Case for Debt Re­fus­al. He also con­trib­uted to the Debt Res­isters’ Op­er­a­tions Manu­al, pub­lished by Strike Debt, an off­shoot of the Oc­cupy move­ment.

The Oc­cupy move­ment has fo­cused a lot on debt, hav­ing cre­ated or­gan­iz­a­tions like Rolling Ju­bilee, which buys health care and stu­dent debt (about $32 mil­lion so far, ac­cord­ing to its web­site), and the Debt Col­lect­ive, which helped or­gan­ize the Cor­inthi­an stu­dent-loan protests.

The reas­on for the debt fo­cus, Ross says, is be­cause an edu­ca­tion is the best way to im­prove a per­son’s stand­ing in life, yet the U.S. edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem is widen­ing gaps of in­equal­ity. “It’s been turned in­to the cruelest of debt trap,” Ross says, “where stu­dents from only the most well-heeled fam­il­ies can es­cape.”

Stu­dent Debt Crisis is an­oth­er or­gan­iz­a­tion that fo­cuses on stu­dent debt. And while it sup­por­ted the Cor­inthi­an 100, Ex­ec­ut­ive Dir­ect­or Nat­alia Ab­rams doesn’t ask people to de­fault. What the group has done is pro­pose two fed­er­al bills in 2012 and 2013 that would have re­pur­posed money from cor­por­ate wel­fare to help pay off stu­dent debt, a move the group be­lieves would have stim­u­lated the eco­nomy from the bot­tom up.

More than 1.2 mil­lion people signed a pe­ti­tion in sup­port, but both bills fell short in Con­gress. Ab­rams ad­vises against vol­un­tary de­fault be­cause “it’s just so det­ri­ment­al, I can’t in good faith ask people to do that.”

Stu­dent loans are dif­fer­ent than al­most any oth­er type of debt. Adam Min­sky, a law­yer who spe­cial­izes in stu­dent loans, says the gov­ern­ment doesn’t even have to take a debt­or to court. Without a court or­der, the gov­ern­ment can gar­nish wages (typ­ic­ally around 15 per­cent of in­come), and with­hold any fed­er­al stream of money, like tax re­funds and So­cial Se­cur­ity.

“They can lit­er­ally pur­sue you un­til you die,” Min­sky says.

In nearly two dozen states, de­fault­ers can have their pro­fes­sion­al li­censes re­voked. In a few, they can even lose their driver’s li­censes. With all this, plus back in­terest, stu­dents who de­fault will likely end up pay­ing much more than they ori­gin­ally bor­rowed. In ad­di­tion, de­fault­ing can ru­in someone’s cred­it.

“Cred­it com­pan­ies don’t care if you didn’t pay the loan be­cause you were dead­beat or mak­ing a protest,” says Dav­id Wessel, dir­ect­or of the Hutchins Cen­ter on Fisc­al and Mon­et­ary Policy at the Brook­ings In­sti­tute.

What hasn’t been talked about much, however, is the po­ten­tial im­pact on the eco­nomy if such a move­ment were to ac­tu­ally gain pop­ular­ity.

The av­er­age col­lege seni­or who gradu­ated from a pub­lic or private non­profit col­lege in 2013 owed $28,400, ac­cord­ing to a re­port by The In­sti­tute for Col­lege Ac­cess & Suc­cess.

Some simple math would lead one to con­clude that if 1 mil­lion people were to de­fault, this would mean a $28 bil­lion bar­gain­ing chip for “con­scien­tious stu­dent-loan de­fault­ers.”

“You really have to break that up in two dif­fer­ent parts,” says Douglas Webber, an as­so­ci­ate pro­fess­or of eco­nom­ics at Temple Uni­versity. “There are gov­ern­ment-backed stu­dent loans and private stu­dent loans, and it’s very easy to pre­dict what will hap­pen in the private mar­ket.”

In the private mar­ket, Webber says, that massive de­fault would in­crease ex­ist­ing stu­dent-loan in­terest rates. Lenders would re­duce the amount of money they loaned to stu­dents, and pos­sibly, stop lend­ing al­to­geth­er.

“It’s a little more dif­fi­cult to talk about what will hap­pen on the gov­ern­ment end,” Webber says. The gov­ern­ment would re­coup it some­where, either from taxes or cuts to ser­vices, or it could just lump it in­to the na­tion­al debt ($18.2 tril­lion and count­ing), he says.

The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment can sue uni­versit­ies for that money. But this is un­likely to hap­pen un­less, as in the Cor­inthi­an case, there are leg­al grounds to be­lieve the school preyed upon its stu­dents. Most likely the gov­ern­ment will re­claim it from the debt­or.

The idea of a wide-scale con­scien­tious stu­dent-loan de­fault­er move­ment has even less of an im­pact giv­en that about 650,000 people de­faul­ted on their loans last year, and there was no ir­re­vers­ible ef­fect set in mo­tion on the part of banks or the gov­ern­ment.

Ul­ti­mately, both Webber and Wessel say, any im­pact to the eco­nomy would be min­im­al.

What a col­lect­ive de­fault could do, though, they say, is fo­cus polit­ic­al aware­ness around rising costs of tu­ition, and an edu­ca­tion­al sys­tem that is in­creas­ingly strat­i­fied and un­equal.

What Ross and the Debt Col­lect­ive hope to ac­com­plish is to em­phas­ize that an edu­ca­tion is a so­cial right, and that the U.S. should join the grow­ing list of coun­tries that provide a free col­lege edu­ca­tion. With a col­lect­ive de­fault, Ross says, someone’s bound to pay at­ten­tion.

“It’s not just about money, it’s about demo­cracy,” Ross says. “If you look back at the civil-rights move­ment, one of the most right­eous de­mands was to open the col­legi­al doors to a pop­u­la­tion who had been denied the right to an edu­ca­tion. And now the right to edu­ca­tion has been re­placed by the right to ac­cess edu­ca­tion­al loans.”

What We're Following See More »
MCCONNELL’S BACK AGAINST THE WALL
Heller, Paul Won’t Vote on Motion to Proceed
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
LESS THAN HOUSE BILL
CBO Says 22 Million More Would Be UNinsured
14 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The Senate bill "would increase the number of people without health insurance by 22 million by 2026, a figure that is only slightly lower than the 23 million more uninsured that the House version would create. Next year, 15 million more people would be uninsured compared with current law...The legislation would decrease federal deficits by a total of $321 billion over a decade."

Source:
BEFORE JULY 4 RECESS
Cornyn Says Health Vote Needed This Week
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
NO LONGER HEADING TO THE UN
Kislyak Being Recalled to Russia
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Ending one the most turbulent tenures of a Washington-based ambassador in recent memory, the Kremlin has decided to recall Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak, three individuals familiar with the decision told BuzzFeed News. The decision to bring Kislyak back to Russia rather than appoint him to a senior position at the United Nations in New York, as several outlets previously reported, comes amid investigations by the FBI and Congress into the 66-year-old diplomat’s contacts with President Donald Trump’s top aides during the 2016 presidential campaign."

Source:
COULD COME UNDER MUELLER’S SCRUTINY
Deutsche Bank Gave Kushner a $285 Million Loan in October
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"One month before Election Day, Jared Kushner’s real estate company finalized a $285 million loan as part of a refinancing package for its property near Times Square in Manhattan. The loan came at a critical moment. Kushner was playing a key role in the presidential campaign of his father-in-law, Donald Trump. The lender, Deutsche Bank, was negotiating to settle a federal mortgage fraud case and charges from New York state regulators that it aided a possible Russian money-laundering scheme."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login