House Votes to Repeal Another Piece of Obamacare

Some Democrats joined Republicans to vote for a repeal of the law’s Independent Payment Advisory Board.

House Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on the Constitution Chairman Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., presides over a hearing on H.R. 3, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act On Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 8, 2011. (AP/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
National Journal
Caitlin Owens
Add to Briefcase
Caitlin Owens
June 23, 2015, 4:34 p.m.

The House eas­ily passed a re­peal of Obama­care’s In­de­pend­ent Pay­ment Ad­vis­ory Board, with a hand­ful of Demo­crats vot­ing with Re­pub­lic­ans against a part of the law aimed at check­ing the growth of Medi­care spend­ing.

The In­de­pend­ent Pay­ment Ad­vis­ory Board has nev­er been used. It con­sists of 15 mem­bers and was in­cluded in the law to con­trol the rate of Medi­care growth and to help the pro­gram come up with sav­ings. The law said the board would make sav­ings re­com­mend­a­tions if Medi­care spend­ing was pro­jec­ted to ex­ceed a cer­tain tar­get rate, but so far, spend­ing hasn’t grown fast enough to trig­ger the IPAB.

The 244-154 vote oc­curred days be­fore an ex­pec­ted Su­preme Court rul­ing on the leg­al­ity of Obama­care sub­sidies. Coupled with a vote to re­peal the law’s med­ic­al-device tax last week, the bi­par­tis­an IPAB re­peal ham­mers home the mes­sage that the Af­ford­able Care Act is broken.

“It’s good that people fi­nally know it’s there; if noth­ing else, this will help people know what was an­oth­er oner­ous ele­ment of Obama­care,” said Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Trent Franks in an in­ter­view.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion last week threatened a veto of the le­gis­la­tion, which has 20 Demo­crat­ic co­spon­sors. It re­mains un­clear wheth­er Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans would be able to muster 60 votes to over­come a Demo­crat­ic fili­buster.

“H.R. 1190 would re­peal and dis­mantle the IPAB even be­fore it has a chance to work. The bill would elim­in­ate an im­port­ant safe­guard that, un­der cur­rent law, will help re­duce the rate of Medi­care cost growth re­spons­ibly while pro­tect­ing Medi­care be­ne­fi­ciar­ies and the tra­di­tion­al pro­gram,” the Of­fice of Man­age­ment and Budget wrote in a state­ment.

But the veto threat didn’t de­ter Re­pub­lic­ans, as passing the le­gis­la­tion wasn’t ne­ces­sar­ily the point of bring­ing it to the floor.

“At least we’ll put on re­cord many Demo­crats who say, ‘Hey, it’s a bad idea,’ and that speaks of the law it­self be­ing prob­lem­at­ic,” Re­pub­lic­an Rep. John Flem­ing said in an in­ter­view. “We’re just go­ing to keep send­ing pieces of re­peal and full re­peals, small re­peals, whatever, and really get as many people on re­cord where they stand on this.”

Al­though only 11 Demo­crats ended up vot­ing for the re­peal, oth­ers might have done so if the bill wasn’t off­set by cuts to Obama­care’s Pre­ven­tion and Pub­lic Health Fund.

“I’m a no vote on this. I don’t like where they come up with the pay-fors,” Demo­crat­ic Rep. Gene Green said in an in­ter­view. “They take it out of a pro­gram that’s part of the Af­ford­able Care Act that’s been suc­cess­ful. And frankly, I didn’t sup­port the IPAB ori­gin­ally.”

The IPAB has been con­tro­ver­sial since its in­cep­tion, with the some Af­ford­able Care Act crit­ics la­beling it a “death pan­el.” The monik­er was used as evid­ence of Re­pub­lic­an mis­in­form­a­tion about the law, but the monik­er has stuck among some con­ser­vat­ives and a siz­able por­tion of the pub­lic con­tin­ues to be­lieve that it is an ac­cur­ate char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion.

What We're Following See More »
TRUMP CANCELS FLORIDA TRIP
Congress Heads Back to Work to End Shutdown
13 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The Senate was expected to be back in session at noon, while House lawmakers were told to return to work for a 9 a.m. session. Mr. Trump on Friday had canceled plans to travel to his private resort on Palm Beach, Fla., where a celebration had been planned for Saturday to celebrate the anniversary of his first year in office."

Source:
CLOTURE FAILS
Government Shutdown Begins, as Senate Balks at Stopgap
15 hours ago
THE LATEST

"A stopgap spending bill stalled in the Senate Friday night, leading to a government shutdown for the first time since 2013. The continuing resolution funding agencies expired at midnight, and lawmakers were unable to spell out any path forward to keep government open. The Senate on Friday night failed to reach cloture on a four-week spending bill the House had already approved."

Source:
HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS IN SUSPICIOUS CHECKS FLAGGED
Mueller’s Team Scrutinizing Russian Embassy Transactions
2 days ago
THE LATEST
PRO-TRUMP SPENDING COULD VIOLATE FECA
FBI Investigating Potential Russian Donations to NRA
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

"The FBI is investigating whether a top Russian banker with ties to the Kremlin illegally funneled money to the National Rifle Association to help Donald Trump win the presidency." Investigators have focused on Alexander Torshin, the deputy governor of Russia’s central bank "who is known for his close relationships with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and the NRA." The solicitation or use of foreign funds is illegal in U.S. elections under the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) by either lobbying groups or political campaigns. The NRA reported spending a record $55 million on the 2016 elections.

Source:
DISCLOSURES MORE THAN DOUBLED
Mueller Investigation Leads to Hundreds of New FARA Filings
2 days ago
THE LATEST

"Hundreds of new and supplemental FARA filings by U.S. lobbyists and public relations firms" have been submitted "since Special Counsel Mueller charged two Trump aides with failing to disclose their lobbying work on behalf of foreign countries. The number of first-time filings ... rose 50 percent to 102 between 2016 and 2017, an NBC News analysis found. The number of supplemental filings, which include details about campaign donations, meetings and phone calls more than doubled from 618 to 1,244 last year as lobbyists scrambled to avoid the same fate as some of Trump's associates and their business partners."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login