The House easily passed a repeal of Obamacare’s Independent Payment Advisory Board, with a handful of Democrats voting with Republicans against a part of the law aimed at checking the growth of Medicare spending.
The Independent Payment Advisory Board has never been used. It consists of 15 members and was included in the law to control the rate of Medicare growth and to help the program come up with savings. The law said the board would make savings recommendations if Medicare spending was projected to exceed a certain target rate, but so far, spending hasn’t grown fast enough to trigger the IPAB.
The 244-154 vote occurred days before an expected Supreme Court ruling on the legality of Obamacare subsidies. Coupled with a vote to repeal the law’s medical-device tax last week, the bipartisan IPAB repeal hammers home the message that the Affordable Care Act is broken.
“It’s good that people finally know it’s there; if nothing else, this will help people know what was another onerous element of Obamacare,” said Republican Rep. Trent Franks in an interview.
The Obama administration last week threatened a veto of the legislation, which has 20 Democratic cosponsors. It remains unclear whether Senate Republicans would be able to muster 60 votes to overcome a Democratic filibuster.
“H.R. 1190 would repeal and dismantle the IPAB even before it has a chance to work. The bill would eliminate an important safeguard that, under current law, will help reduce the rate of Medicare cost growth responsibly while protecting Medicare beneficiaries and the traditional program,” the Office of Management and Budget wrote in a statement.
But the veto threat didn’t deter Republicans, as passing the legislation wasn’t necessarily the point of bringing it to the floor.
“At least we’ll put on record many Democrats who say, ‘Hey, it’s a bad idea,’ and that speaks of the law itself being problematic,” Republican Rep. John Fleming said in an interview. “We’re just going to keep sending pieces of repeal and full repeals, small repeals, whatever, and really get as many people on record where they stand on this.”
Although only 11 Democrats ended up voting for the repeal, others might have done so if the bill wasn’t offset by cuts to Obamacare’s Prevention and Public Health Fund.
“I’m a no vote on this. I don’t like where they come up with the pay-fors,” Democratic Rep. Gene Green said in an interview. “They take it out of a program that’s part of the Affordable Care Act that’s been successful. And frankly, I didn’t support the IPAB originally.”
The IPAB has been controversial since its inception, with the some Affordable Care Act critics labeling it a “death panel.” The moniker was used as evidence of Republican misinformation about the law, but the moniker has stuck among some conservatives and a sizable portion of the public continues to believe that it is an accurate characterization.
What We're Following See More »
With President Trump back from a trip in which he seemed to undermine European alliances while cozying up to Vladimir Putin, the White House has announced that European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker will visit on July 25. According to a statement, the two "will focus on improving transatlantic trade and forging a stronger economic partnership."
"The House Veterans Affairs Committee has launched an investigation into care at the VA’s 133 nursing homes after learning the agency had given almost half of them the lowest possible score in secret, internal rankings. The probe follows an investigation by The Boston Globe and USA TODAY that showed 60 VA nursing homes ... rated only one out of five stars for quality last year in the agency’s own ranking system." Internal documents revealed that "patients in more than two-thirds of VA nursing homes were more likely to suffer pain and serious bedsores than their private sector counterparts, and that "VA nursing homes scored worse than private nursing homes on a majority of key quality indicators, including rates of anti-psychotic drug prescription and decline in daily living skills."
Colorado Representative Mike Coffman has introduced a bill "that would codify free internet regulations into law" by instituting the "basic outlines of the Federal Communication Commission’s 2015 Open Internet order." Coffman's bill amends the 1934 Telecommunications Act by "banning providers from controlling traffic quality and speed and forbidding them from participating in paid prioritization programs or charging access fees from edge providers." The GOP congressman has also "signed on to a Democrat-led effort to reinstate the net neutrality rules that the FCC voted to repeal late last year."