House Oversight Chair Accuses OPM Director of Lying About Cyberattack

“It was misleading, it was a lie, and it wasn’t true,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz said.

Katherine Archuleta, director of Office of Personnel Management, testifies during a Senate Appropriations Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee hearing on Capitol Hill, June 23, 2015 in Washington, D.C.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Add to Briefcase
Dustin Volz
June 24, 2015, 8:14 a.m.

House Over­sight Chair­man Jason Chaf­fetz on Wed­nes­day ac­cused the chief of the Of­fice of Per­son­nel Man­age­ment of ly­ing about the ex­tent of a 2014 cy­ber­at­tack waged against her agency.

In a con­ten­tious back-and-forth ex­change, Chaf­fetz said OPM Dir­ect­or Kath­er­ine Archu­leta was dis­hon­est about an in­tru­sion re­vealed in March 2014 that oc­curred on the of­fice’s net­works. Cit­ing a TV in­ter­view she gave after the at­tack was dis­closed, Chaf­fetz sug­ges­ted she had been mis­lead­ing about its im­pact when she said that in­form­a­tion had not been com­prom­ised.

“When we re­wind the tape “¦ you said, again, ‘We did not have a breach of se­cur­ity. There was no in­form­a­tion that was lost,’” Chaf­fetz said. “That was false, wasn’t it?”

Mo­ments be­fore, Donna Sey­mour, OPM’s chief in­form­a­tion of­ficer, ac­know­ledged that some in­form­a­tion was ex­posed dur­ing that hack, but that it was lim­ited to “out­dated se­cur­ity doc­u­ments” and oth­er manu­als re­lated to how the OPM op­er­ates.

But Archu­leta said the quote was be­ing mis­in­ter­preted, ar­guing that she was re­fer­ring only to per­son­ally iden­ti­fi­able in­form­a­tion and not oth­er files held by OPM.

“No you wer­en’t—that wasn’t the ques­tion,” Chaf­fetz shot back.

“It was mis­lead­ing, it was a lie, and it wasn’t true,” Chaf­fetz said. “And when this plays out, we’re go­ing to find out that this was the step that al­lowed them to come back and why we’re in this mess today.”

Wed­nes­day’s hear­ing is the second in as many weeks be­fore the House Over­sight Com­mit­tee for Archu­leta, whose agency has been un­der siege since earli­er this month, when it dis­closed two massive thefts of data, both of which are be­lieved to be China’s do­ing. Chaf­fetz and a hand­ful of law­makers—both Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans—have called for Archu­leta’s resig­na­tion on grounds that she ig­nored warn­ing signs about the cy­ber vul­ner­ab­il­it­ies of OPM’s serv­ers.

Archu­leta said at the out­set of the hear­ing that she wanted to cor­rect me­dia re­ports that as many as 18 mil­lion in­di­vidu­als may have been af­fected by the re­cent hacks on fed­er­al em­ploy­ee data and se­cur­ity-clear­ance in­form­a­tion. The first breach is still be­lieved to have hit about 4 mil­lion people, Archu­leta said, adding that in­vest­ig­at­ors were still de­term­in­ing the scope of the second in­tru­sion.

The 18-mil­lion fig­ure, re­por­ted this week by CNN, “is a num­ber I am not com­fort­able with,” Archu­leta said. “It is my un­der­stand­ing that the 18 mil­lion refers to a pre­lim­in­ary, un­veri­fied and ap­prox­im­ate num­ber of unique So­cial Se­cur­ity num­bers in the back­ground in­vest­ig­a­tion data,”

Chaf­fetz, however, sug­ges­ted that OPM holds data on as many as 32 mil­lion people who could be vul­ner­able—a num­ber he took from a Feb­ru­ary budget re­quest from Archu­leta.

“I’m not go­ing to give you a num­ber I am un­sure of,” Archu­leta said.

Archu­leta did earn some de­fense from Rep. Gerry Con­nolly, a Vir­gin­ia Demo­crat who cas­tig­ated some of his col­leagues for fo­cus­ing too much on the blame game.

“To pre­tend that this is Miss Archu­leta’s fault is to miss the pic­ture and really do a dis­ser­vice to our coun­try,” Con­nolly said, adding that the U.S. is en­gaged in “a new Cold War with cer­tain ad­versar­ies, in­clud­ing China and Rus­sia.”

Earli­er Wed­nes­day, OPM re­leased a “cy­ber­se­cur­ity ac­tion re­port” that an­nounced the on­go­ing rol­lout of a series of ad­di­tion­al se­cur­ity meas­ures, in­clud­ing the hir­ing by Aug. 1 of a “lead­ing cy­ber­se­cur­ity ex­pert from out­side gov­ern­ment” who will re­port to Archu­leta. The re­port also vowed ex­pan­ded co­oper­a­tion with the De­part­ment of Home­land Se­cur­ity and said by Aug. 1 OPM would re­quire all em­ploy­ees to use a smart card to log on to its com­puters.

This story has been up­dated.

What We're Following See More »
WASN’T INFORMED HE COULD BE DEPORTED
SCOTUS Throws Out Immigrant’s Conviction, Citing Poor Representation
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday threw out a legal immigrant's drug conviction on the grounds that his lawyer had failed to advise him that he could be deported to his native South Korea if found guilty. The court ruled 6-2 in favor of Jae Lee, who ran two restaurants in Memphis, Tennessee and has lived in the United States since 1982 when he was 12. Despite the ruling, Lee could still be deported if he is tried and convicted again for the drug offense."

Source:
JOBS TRUMP CLAIMED TO SAVE
Carrier Moving 600 Jobs to Mexico
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS
LONG RUMORED
Jets Owner Woody Johnson Nominated as Ambassador to UK
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS
ARE “OPEN TO NEGOTIATION”
Sens. Paul, Cruz, Johnson and Lee Oppose Senate Health Care Bill
23 hours ago
THE LATEST

The four Senators released a joint statement, saying in part, "There are provisions in this draft that repreesnt an improvement to our current health care system, but it does not appear this draft as written will accomplish the most important promise we made to Americans: to repeal Obamacare and lower their health care costs."

Source:
TRUMP SUGGESTED THERE WERE TAPES
No Comey Tapes
1 days ago
THE LATEST

Trump tweeted Thursday afternoon, "With all of the recently reported electronic surveillance, intercepts, unmasking and illegal leaking of information, I have no idea whether there are "tapes" or recordings of my conversations with James Comey, but I did not make, and do not have, any such recordings."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login