A Concierge of Your Own

As older people try to keep living at home, having someone to call who’ll know who to call helps a lot.

A young woman helps a senior citizen.
National Journal
June 29, 2015, 5 a.m.

The old rules of aging offered the eld­erly three choices: move some­place warm, move close to the kids, or move in­to an as­sisted-liv­ing fa­cil­ity.

These op­tions had something in com­mon: They all in­volved mov­ing. But many seni­or cit­izens don’t want to leave the home and com­munity they’ve known and loved. “The whole bill of goods about be­ing old, that you are a little bit use­less and that you’ve done your thing and checked out your brain at 65, this is a ter­rible im­age of aging,” says 81-year-old Susan McWhin­ney-Morse, who re­cently re­turned home from a tour of ar­che­olo­gic­al digs in Ir­an. “We just felt that everything was wrong about how older people were treated.”

So in 1999, McWhin­ney-Morse and a group of Bo­sto­ni­ans sought to change this im­age of aging. The group wanted to de­vise a strategy to al­low them to re­main in their homes while not bur­den­ing adult chil­dren or friends. Fin­an­cially, they did not want to de­vel­op a pro­gram so ex­pens­ive that it would ex­clude lower-in­come or middle-class people from join­ing. They spent a few years re­search­ing ideas, put­ting to­geth­er a busi­ness plan, and rais­ing seed money.

In 2002, they opened the Beacon Hill Vil­lage, a non­profit net­work of seni­or cit­izens. For an an­nu­al fee ran­ging from $110 to $975, de­pend­ing on in­come and house­hold size, mem­bers have ac­cess to free ex­er­cise classes and so­cial clubs, a com­munity of like-minded seni­ors, and a small but ded­ic­ated pro­fes­sion­al staff that can ar­range for ser­vices a mem­ber might need, such as a ride to the su­per­mar­ket, nurs­ing help, and re­com­mend­a­tions for handy­men, plumb­ers, and com­puter geeks. It’s like hav­ing ac­cess to a con­ci­erge who un­der­stands the needs of the eld­erly. Mem­bers pay the vendor dir­ectly for the ser­vices they use.

“They cre­ated this concept out of noth­ing,” says Laura Con­nors, ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of Beacon Hill Vil­lage. “They were try­ing to demon­strate what aging can be.”

Beacon Hill Vil­lage has grown to roughly 340 mem­bers, cov­er­ing the af­flu­ent Beacon Hill and Back Bay neigh­bor­hoods along with the grit­ti­er North End. In­spired by the suc­cess in Bo­ston, an­oth­er 165 vil­lages have opened across the coun­try, serving roughly 30,000 mem­bers. The idea surged across the coun­try after The New York Times pro­filed the Bo­ston ex­per­i­ment in 2006. Its founders were so in­und­ated for ad­vice on how they got star­ted that they wrote a manu­al, now pos­ted on their web­site, for any­one in­ter­ested in try­ing the same.

These “vil­lages” have popped up in big cit­ies, small towns, and rur­al loc­ales, each one tailored to the needs of its place and founders. Rur­al vil­lages, for ex­ample, would in­volve more trans­port­a­tion op­tions and driv­ing for res­id­ents, since ser­vices are so spread out—un­like Beacon Hill, say, where even an older per­son might stroll to a nearby res­taur­ant to see friends. Each ven­ture “will lever­age what the com­munity has to of­fer,” Con­nors says.

A prob­lem that many such vil­lages share is that not every­one who has reached 65 wants to as­so­ci­ate with a pro­gram for the eld­erly. “The ‘young­er’ older adults “¦ don’t think they need it,” Con­nors says. “That’s one of our chal­lenges: How do we talk about ourselves dif­fer­ently?”

Con­sider the po­ten­tial be­ne­fits for the aged. Joan Bra­gen, a sharp 80-year-old, joined Beacon Hill Vil­lage four years ago when she real­ized that she needed oc­ca­sion­al help around her con­domin­i­um and in get­ting around Bo­ston. Liv­ing alone without a car and with her closest re­l­at­ives in New York, she has leaned on Beacon Hill Vil­lage to hire a vis­it­ing nurse after sur­gery, to find an elec­tri­cian, and to ar­range weekly rides with vo­lun­teer drivers to buy gro­cer­ies. Bra­gen has also gone with oth­er mem­bers to mu­seums and out to Tangle­wood, in west­ern Mas­sachu­setts, where the Bo­ston Sym­phony Or­ches­tra per­forms in the sum­mer­time.

“It is like hav­ing fam­ily in the neigh­bor­hood. The people from the vil­lage al­ways re­spond im­me­di­ately,” she says. “They are like a touch­stone.”

They may also be a money-saver. Ac­cord­ing to Con­nors, the Beacon Hill dir­ect­or, the “vil­lage” mod­el provides seni­ors with a cheap­er al­tern­at­ive to as­sisted liv­ing fa­cil­it­ies, which can cost thou­sands of dol­lars per month. Be­sides ar­ran­ging for needed ser­vices, the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s staff of­ten ne­go­ti­ates dis­counts for its mem­bers.

The or­gan­iz­a­tion has min­im­al over­head costs. Beacon Hill Vil­lage owns no prop­erty—it rents of­fice space in a one-time po­lice pre­cinct headquar­ters—and em­ploys only four people, in­clud­ing two part-timers. Just over half of its budget comes from mem­bers’ an­nu­al fees; the rest comes from found­a­tions, cor­por­a­tions, and in­di­vidu­al donors. Some of its kindred or­gan­iz­a­tions rely more on vo­lun­teers to provide ser­vices to mem­bers.

This con­ci­erge-like mod­el won’t work for all seni­ors, es­pe­cially those who suf­fer from poor health or de­men­tia or oth­er cog­nit­ive prob­lems. It works best for people who are self-suf­fi­cient enough to live at home without round-the-clock care. Just 15 per­cent of the Beacon Hill Vil­lage mem­bers are con­sidered frail, some of them re­quir­ing an aide’s home care a few hours a day.

“The vil­lage is not ne­ces­sar­ily go­ing to take care of you to the grave,” says McWhin­ney-Morse, the 81-year-old mem­ber, “but it can help you find places to go when you need more help.”

It also can provide a so­cial out­let, of­ten harder to find as people age. Be­sides the weekly runs to the gro­cery store and the cul­tur­al ex­cur­sions, mem­bers plan activ­it­ies among them­selves. One group of men tries a happy hour at a dif­fer­ent bar each month; an­oth­er group ar­gues polit­ics over cof­fee one morn­ing a week. Some mem­bers play bridge or gath­er weekly for an af­ter­noon movie—”a com­munity with­in a com­munity,” Con­nors says.

When a mem­ber’s life changes—be­cause of ill health or a spouse’s death—oth­er mem­bers can help in a non-in­trus­ive way. The same goes for the or­gan­iz­a­tion’s em­ploy­ees, who check up on feeble mem­bers without dic­tat­ing the type of care or ser­vices that any­one needs.

“What I think is re­mark­able is that it really is older people cre­at­ing something for them­selves and not look­ing to the gov­ern­ment to give us money or for someone to build something for us,” McWhin­ney-Morse says. “It is simply al­low­ing people to cre­ate how and where they want to age.”

What We're Following See More »
Mnuchin Tells Neal He Won't Comply with Subpoena for Trump Taxes
5 hours ago
Trump Cannot Block Subpoena of His Accounting Records
5 hours ago
White House Will Tell McGahn Not to Testify
8 hours ago
Prosecutors Poring Over Inauguration Documents
9 hours ago
SCOTUS Says Businesses Can't Donate to Candidates
9 hours ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.