GOP Presidential Hopefuls Introduce Sheldon Adelson-Backed Bill to Ban Online Gambling

Sens. Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio are among a cohort of senators that revived legislation heavily favored by the billionaire GOP donor.

Sheldon Adelson single-handedly helped Newt Gingrich stay alive in the 2012 Republican presidential primaries.
National Journal
June 24, 2015, 4:01 p.m.

Two Re­pub­lic­an sen­at­ors run­ning for pres­id­ent re­in­tro­duced a bill Wed­nes­day that would ef­fect­ively ban In­ter­net poker and oth­er forms of on­line gambling—le­gis­la­tion that has long been cham­pioned by casino mag­nate and GOP mega-donor Shel­don Ad­el­son.

Both Lind­sey Gra­ham and Marco Ru­bio joined a hand­ful of Re­pub­lic­ans and one Demo­crat in re­viv­ing the Res­tor­a­tion of Amer­ica’s Wire Act, a meas­ure that pro­ponents say would “re­store” the prop­er in­ter­pret­a­tion of a dec­ades-old fed­er­al ban on some gambling op­er­a­tions by ex­pand­ing it to in­clude In­ter­net gambling.

The four-page bill is nearly the same as a meas­ure in­tro­duced last year and closely mir­rors a bill offered by House Over­sight Chair­man Jason Chaf­fetz this year. The on­line ban has failed to gain trac­tion in either cham­ber of Con­gress, but Ad­el­son—whose net worth tal­lies in the bil­lions and who has made a name of him­self as one of the biggest fun­ders of Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial cam­paigns—re­mains an in­flu­en­tial and ar­dent sup­port­er.

(RE­LATED: An Ad­el­son Backs Lind­sey Gra­ham for Pres­id­ent

Back­ers of the bill, in­clud­ing Gra­ham and Ru­bio, say that Ad­el­son’s in­flu­ence has noth­ing to do with their sup­port. They ar­gue that the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion ac­ted bey­ond its bounds in 2011 when it is­sued a Justice De­part­ment memo cla­ri­fy­ing its read­ing of the 1961 Wire Act, which his­tor­ic­ally has been used to po­lice all forms of gambling. That memo said that in­ter­state gambling across “wire com­mu­nic­a­tions” that do not re­late to sports bet­ting do not fall with­in the scope of the act.

“Now, be­cause of this de­cision by the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion, vir­tu­ally any cell phone or com­puter in South Car­o­lina could be­come a video poker ma­chine,” Gra­ham said in a state­ment. “A ma­jor re­write of a long-stand­ing fed­er­al law like this should be made by the people’s elec­ted rep­res­ent­at­ives in Con­gress and signed in­to law by the pres­id­ent, not done ad­min­is­trat­ively.”

But the le­gis­la­tion’s crit­ics, in­clud­ing poker groups and former Rep. Ron Paul, have ac­cused its spon­sors of suc­cumb­ing to blatant cronyism to ap­pease Ad­el­son’s deep pock­ets. As chief ex­ec­ut­ive of Las Ve­gas Sands Cor­por­a­tion, Ad­el­son presides over a brick-and-mor­tar casino em­pire and has vowed to spend un­lim­ited amounts of money to end U.S. gam­ing sites. Though his de­tract­ors see the lob­by­ing as self-serving, Ad­el­son has ar­gued those sites—which ex­ploded in pop­ular­ity over the past 15 years—amount to a “so­ci­et­al train wreck wait­ing to hap­pen” be­cause they un­der­mine fam­ily val­ues.

(RE­LATED: Sev­en Free-Agent Re­pub­lic­an Mega-Donors to Watch)

John Pap­pas, the ex­ec­ut­ive dir­ect­or of the Poker Play­ers Al­li­ance, sug­ges­ted in a state­ment that Gra­ham’s in­tro­duc­tion of the bill wasn’t be­ing re­spect­ful of the re­cent mass shoot­ing at Emanuel AME Church in Char­le­ston, South Car­o­lina.

“As the eyes of the na­tion are fo­cused on South Car­o­lina fol­low­ing the re­cent tra­gic event, I think I speak for most Amer­ic­ans when I ex­press pro­found dis­ap­point­ment in Sen­at­or Gra­ham for choos­ing this time to ad­vance a bill for the sole be­ne­fit of a bil­lion­aire polit­ic­al donor,” Pap­pas said. “The Con­gress made the de­cision to ad­journ early so they could at­tend ser­vices on Fri­day in Sen­at­or Gra­ham’s home state. Un­for­tu­nately, Sen­at­or Gra­ham has not re­set his pri­or­it­ies and picked a very un­for­tu­nate time to en­gage in the In­ter­net gam­ing de­bate.”

Ad­el­son so far has not pub­licly pledged fealty to any one GOP con­tender this cycle, though he did make dona­tions to Gra­ham’s Sen­ate reelec­tion cam­paign last year. That cash co­in­cided with a sud­den in­terest in on­line gambling from the sen­at­or, who had been quiet on the is­sue. Ad­el­son also co­chaired a Gra­ham fun­draiser in Feb­ru­ary of this year.

(RE­LATED: How Ted Cruz Is Mak­ing His Case to Shel­don Ad­el­son)

Ru­bio has been re­l­at­ively quiet on on­line gambling as well. But many be­lieve the Flor­ida de­fense hawk’s policy po­s­i­tions line up well with Ad­el­son’s pri­or­it­ies, par­tic­u­larly in re­gard to na­tion­al de­fense and Is­rael.

Ad­el­son launched the Co­ali­tion to Stop In­ter­net Gambling last year, amid ac­tion from sev­er­al state­houses to re­duce or re­move re­stric­tions on on­line gambling. In a state­ment, the group said there was a “tre­mend­ous amount of mo­mentum” for cur­tail­ing In­ter­net gam­ing.

“Pred­at­ory on­line gambling is ru­in­ing lives all across our coun­try and this bill will help us stop it,” John Ash­brook, a co­ali­tion spokes­man, said.

Oth­er spon­sors of the Restor­ing Amer­ica’s Wire Act in­clude Re­pub­lic­ans Kelly Ayotte, Mike Lee, Dan Coats, and Thom Tillis, in ad­di­tion to Cali­for­nia Demo­crat Di­anne Fein­stein.

This story has been up­dated.

What We're Following See More »
McCain Family to Endorse Biden
44 minutes ago

"The late Sen. John McCain's family plans to support former Vice President Joe Biden's White House bid, backing the Democrat not only in his party's crowded primary race but also in a general election matchup with President Trump, the Washington Examiner has learned. In an extraordinary snub to Trump, who derided McCain's Vietnam War service and mocked him even after his death last August at age 81, the McCain family is preparing to break with the Republican Party. McCain represented the party in Congress for 35 years and was chosen as its presidential nominee in 2008, losing to Barack Obama."

IRS Resists Giving Congress Trump's Tax Returns
4 hours ago

"Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin left little doubt Tuesday that the administration will reject a congressional request for President Donald Trump's tax returns by a self-imposed May 6 target for a "final decision," setting the stage for a legal battle that will test the limits of congressional oversight."

Trump Opposes White House Aides Giving Congressional Testimony
4 hours ago

"President Trump on Tuesday said he is opposed to current and former White House aides providing testimony to congressional panels in the wake of the special counsel report, intensifying a power struggle between his administration and House Democrats. In an interview with The Washington Post, Trump said that complying with congressional requests was unnecessary after the White House cooperated with special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of Russian interference and the president’s own conduct in office."

Judge Blocks Trump Abortion Rule
4 hours ago

"U.S. District Judge Michael J. McShane late Tuesday said he’ll grant a preliminary injunction against new federal restrictions that bar taxpayer-funded family planning clinics from referring patients to abortion providers, calling the rule a 'ham-fisted approach to public health policy.' Oregon is one of 20 states and the District of Columbia that challenged the Trump administration’s changes to the Title X family planning program in U.S. District Court in Oregon, along with Planned Parenthood affiliates and the American Medical Association."

Nadler Subpoenas Unredacted Report
5 days ago

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.