Off to the Races

Talking About Trump May Pay Off on Television, But…

Soon pundits need to get serious and explain that the GOP is locked in a three-way race.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump walks onstage for a rally at the Reno Ballroom and Museum in Reno, Nevada on Sunday.
AP Photo/Lance Iversen
Jan. 11, 2016, 8 p.m.

It’s get­ting in­creas­ingly an­noy­ing to watch people who os­tens­ibly know a lot about polit­ics go­ing on tele­vi­sion and say­ing things that I am reas­on­ably sure they don’t really be­lieve. Lately, it has been ana­lysts talk­ing up Don­ald Trump’s chances of win­ning the GOP nom­in­a­tion. What view­ers are hear­ing from pros on tele­vi­sion is very dif­fer­ent from what is be­ing said off cam­era.

For those host­ing tele­vi­sion shows, my guess is that it is the simple equa­tion that Trump’s ap­pear­ances and his pro­nounce­ments, even if only on the phone, equal high­er rat­ings, hap­pi­er “Suits” (the net­work bosses), and more luc­rat­ive deals next time the “tal­ent” ne­go­ti­ate con­tracts. For journ­al­ists who are in­vited to go on tele­vi­sion to be in­ter­viewed or par­ti­cip­ate in pan­els, talk­ing about Trump equals more in­vit­a­tions to ap­pear on shows.

Yes, it’s true that Trump has been un­der­es­tim­ated since his ini­tial rise back in June. He rose high­er and faster than nearly any­one be­lieved, and he has las­ted longer than even starry-eyed sup­port­ers thought pos­sible. Trump has con­sol­id­ated the pop­u­lists and less ideo­lo­gic­ally driv­en voters on the right side of the 50-yard line—a group that tends to be more angry and ali­en­ated than the elect­or­ate as a whole. But the simple arith­met­ic is that if Trump is gen­er­ally pulling between 30 and 35 per­cent in the polls in Iowa, New Hamp­shire, and na­tion­ally, that also means that between 65 and 70 per­cent are not for him—and pre­sum­ably few of those in that 65 or 70 per­cent are not fa­mil­i­ar with him. Cur­rent Trump sup­port­ers do not re­semble cur­rent non-Trump sup­port­ers either demo­graph­ic­ally or tem­pera­ment­ally.

It is also true that Ted Cruz has con­sol­id­ated the tra­di­tion­al, con­ser­vat­ive ideo­logues, the liber­tari­ans as well as faith-based so­cial con­ser­vat­ives. Let’s face it: Mike Hucka­bee, Rand Paul, and Rick San­tor­um, just to men­tion three, are vir­tu­ally out of the race. Once they drop out, it’s only a mat­ter of time be­fore Cruz mops up the re­mainder of their sup­port­ers.

It’s also true that the more con­ven­tion­al, es­tab­lish­ment-ori­ented Re­pub­lic­an vote re­mains badly splintered between Jeb Bush, Chris Christie, John Kasich, and Marco Ru­bio, par­tic­u­larly in New Hamp­shire. But there is little doubt that sup­port for these more tra­di­tion­al Re­pub­lic­ans will con­sol­id­ate as the weeks go by, first be­hind two of them un­til one emerges to go head-to-head with Cruz on the right and Trump and his pop­u­lists. That’s what takes this race a com­pet­it­ive, three-way con­test, a bit dif­fer­ent from the “Trump is the polls” nar­rat­ive that is dom­in­ant today.

Then, of course, there is the ar­gu­ment that Trump’s voters tend to not be tra­di­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an primary voters and caucus at­tendees. Some aren’t re­gistered to vote at all. Some are in­de­pend­ent or non­af­fili­ated voters in states with closed primar­ies where only party mem­bers are al­lowed to vote and voters are al­lowed change parties on Elec­tion Day. But how many will ac­tu­ally do that? Oc­ca­sion­ally the ax­iom that people who haven’t voted in primar­ies in the past will fi­nally do so in an up­com­ing elec­tion will be true, but usu­ally it isn’t. The elect­or­ate doesn’t usu­ally ex­pand. There have been no signs of un­usu­al ex­pan­sion in GOP voter rolls in Iowa, for ex­ample, mean­ing that in­de­pend­ents want­ing to sup­port Trump will have to change their re­gis­tra­tion as they try to enter the caucus room.

Fi­nally, there is the ar­gu­ment that has been made re­peatedly in this column—that once these angry pop­u­lists have fin­ished vent­ing their spleens, once they feel their voices have been heard, they will switch to a more plaus­ible vehicle for their dis­con­tent, to a can­did­ate that they could, in fact, en­vi­sion in the White House Situ­ation Room with a fin­ger on the pro­ver­bi­al nuc­le­ar but­ton, someone whose tem­pera­ment and judg­ment might be on firmer ground.

It is worth re­mem­ber­ing that 94 per­cent of the 2,472 Re­pub­lic­an con­ven­tion del­eg­ates are not from the Feb­ru­ary states of Iowa, New Hamp­shire, South Car­o­lina, and Nevada; these del­eg­ates are picked on or after March 1, and the win­ner-take-all states don’t come on­line un­til Flor­ida and Ohio on March 15. Fifty-eight per­cent of del­eg­ates are picked in March, 16 per­cent in April, and 8 per­cent in May, with the fi­nal 12 per­cent in early June. It’s a long slog to the nom­in­a­tion.

In short, take a deep breath and be­ware of talk­ing heads be­hav­ing as if their hair is on fire. This pro­cess only starts be­gin­ning in three weeks with Iowa and doesn’t start in earn­est un­til March 1.

What We're Following See More »
SHE IS AMBASSADOR TO CANADA AND A GOP DONOR
Kelly Craft Nominated for UN Post
2 hours ago
THE LATEST
CRITICS CALL RULE "AN INDIRECT WAY TO DEFUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD"
Trump Blocks Federal Funding to Groups that Make Abortion Referrals
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The Trump administration took aim at Planned Parenthood Friday, issuing a rule barring groups that provide abortions or abortion referrals from participating in the $286 million federal family planning program — a move that is expected to direct millions toward faith-based providers."

Source:
SENATE MUST THEN VOTE ON MEASURE WITHIN 18 DAYS
House Expects Tuesday Vote to End National Emergency
9 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"The House plans to vote Tuesday on legislation to formally block President Donald Trump’s attempt to circumvent Congress to fund his border wall, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced Friday. The privileged resolution to stop Trump’s emergency declaration — which has 226 co-sponsors, including one Republican — is expected to easily pass the House. It then will be voted in the Senate within 18 days."

Source:
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login