Here’s the Real Reason Hillary Clinton Has a Lock on the Democratic Nomination

Support from African-Americans is key, and her would-be challengers aren’t doing much to win it.

July 5, 2015, 4 p.m.

Hil­lary Clin­ton is a near-lock for the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion for many reas­ons, but among the most sig­ni­fic­ant is that her chal­lengers have min­im­al ap­peal to the party’s base of Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters.

Clin­ton learned firsthand the im­port­ance of their sup­port in 2008, when many of them aban­doned her pres­id­en­tial cam­paign to get be­hind the first vi­able Afric­an-Amer­ic­an pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate.

This time, she should have little con­cern about that: Barack Obama can’t run again, and the can­did­ates who are run­ning haven’t done much to rally Afric­an-Amer­ic­an sup­port.

(RE­LATED: Obama, Em­boldened, Ad­dresses Race as Nev­er Be­fore)

Ver­mont Sen. Bernie Sanders, the chal­lenger with the most mo­mentum, rep­res­ents a state that’s 95 per­cent white, where Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans and multi-ra­cial voters out­num­ber blacks. He’s fo­cused most of his cam­paign mes­sage on in­come in­equal­ity, con­strain­ing Wall Street ex­cess, and cam­paign fin­ance re­form, while avoid­ing dis­cus­sions on race re­la­tions, urb­an poli­cing, or gun con­trol. Only 25 per­cent of non-white Demo­crat­ic voters said they’d even con­sider back­ing the sen­at­or’s pres­id­en­tial bid, ac­cord­ing to last month’s NBC/Wall Street Journ­al sur­vey.

Former Mary­land Gov. Mar­tin O’Mal­ley, des­pite rep­res­ent­ing a state where nearly half of Demo­crat­ic voters are black, has been un­able to make in­roads with his one­time polit­ic­al base. In fact, he drew some jeers when he re­turned to Bal­timore in the wake of vi­ol­ent ri­ot­ing that tore apart the city. As may­or, his tough-on-crime meas­ures were pop­u­lar with Mary­land voters, but the no-tol­er­ance ap­proach ali­en­ated many Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters in the state’s largest city. Even some of his base-pleas­ing ac­com­plish­ments as gov­ernor—such as his early sup­port for gay mar­riage—hold lim­ited ap­peal with black voters. In a re­cent speech, he awk­wardly com­pared his ex­per­i­ence as a “minor­ity white can­did­ate” for may­or to the broad­er Afric­an-Amer­ic­an ex­per­i­ence.

(RE­LATED: Mar­tin O’Mal­ley: I Wish Bal­timore Got Body Cam­er­as for Cops When I Was May­or)

Mean­while, Clin­ton’s oth­er rival is more con­ser­vat­ive than the en­tire Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial field when it comes to the Con­fed­er­ate flag. Former Sen. Jim Webb, who was the Demo­crats’ Sen­ate ma­jor­ity-maker less than a dec­ade ago, now finds him­self badly out of step with his party on civil rights is­sues. On Face­book, he called for “mu­tu­al re­spect” when con­sid­er­ing the Con­fed­er­ate flag in a way that “re­spects the com­plic­ated his­tory of the Civil War.” He will struggle to make in­roads with minor­it­ies, giv­en how out of step he is with an in­creas­ingly pro­gress­ive Demo­crat­ic base.

Polls in Iowa and New Hamp­shire may show Clin­ton with less-than-com­mand­ing leads over Sanders and every­one else, but take those res­ults with a grain of salt; they don’t mean much go­ing for­ward. Iowa and New Hamp­shire have among the most ho­mo­gen­eous Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ates in the coun­try, demo­graph­ic­ally dis­con­nec­ted from the party’s base in most oth­er states.

(RE­LATED: There’s Something About Sanders)

Even a best-case scen­ario for Clin­ton’s chal­lengers wouldn’t yield any long-term suc­cess. If, say, Sanders car­ried New Hamp­shire, he’d im­me­di­ately need to trans­late that mo­mentum to South Car­o­lina, where Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans make up a ma­jor­ity of the Demo­crat­ic primary vote. It’s al­most im­possible to see Sanders’s sup­port—what polit­ic­al ana­lyst Mi­chael Bar­one calls his “Birken­stock con­stitu­ency”—trans­lat­ing down South. Mean­while in Nevada, where im­mig­ra­tion is the dom­in­ant is­sue among Demo­crat­ic act­iv­ists, Sanders’s re­l­at­ive si­lence on the sub­ject makes him a poor fit. (Sanders helped scuttle George W. Bush’s ef­forts for com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form in 2007, at­tack­ing the bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion for driv­ing down wages for work­ing-class Amer­ic­ans.)

The biggest ques­tion is wheth­er Clin­ton’s un­im­peded path to the nom­in­a­tion is a product of her polit­ic­al strength, or a sign that Demo­crats don’t have any oth­er can­did­ates who can ap­peal to their di­verse con­stitu­ency. If a can­did­ate with stronger ap­peal to minor­ity voters chal­lenged her, would he or she ex­per­i­ence an Obama-style wave of sup­port? Are Clin­ton’s fa­vor­able rat­ings so sol­id be­cause of her lack of com­pet­i­tion, or is her polit­ic­al stand­ing dis­suad­ing oth­ers from run­ning against her? It’s the polit­ic­al ver­sion of the chick­en-and-egg ar­gu­ment.

The an­swer is cru­cial to her strategy in the gen­er­al elec­tion, where she’s seek­ing to re­cre­ate Obama’s old co­ali­tion by try­ing to con­nect to every one of his core con­stitu­en­cies. If Afric­an-Amer­ic­an en­thu­si­asm for Clin­ton comes close to match­ing Obama’s, then the base-first ap­proach will pay di­vidends down the road. But if she’s win­ning non-white voters in the primary by de­fault—run­ning against old white men with lim­ited ties to the rising Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ate—she could face a rude awaken­ing next Novem­ber.

What We're Following See More »
House Ethics Committee Sanctions Meadows, Kihuen
6 hours ago

The House Ethics Committee has formally sanctioned Reps. Mark Meadows and Ruben Kihuen over sexual harassment-related allegations. "Meadows was found to have violated House rules 'by failing to take appropriate steps to ensure that his House office was free from discrimination and any perception of discrimination.'" Meadows will have to pay over $40,000 to cover the cost of former chief of staff Kenny West's salary, who remained on his payroll even after Meadows' learned "of credible harassment allegations against the former aide. ... Kihuen, who announced his retirement as the #MeToo movement swept Capitol Hill last year, was found to have 'made persistent and unwanted advances towards women who were required to interact with him as part of their professional responsibilities.'"

Trump To Nominate Andrew Wheeler To Lead EPA
6 hours ago

"President Trump said he plans to nominate Andrew Wheeler, acting head of the Environmental Protection Agency, to be the EPA's Senate-confirmed administrator." Wheeler took over as acting administrator in July, "when then-EPA chief Scott Pruitt resigned amid numerous spending and ethics scandals. ... Before working for the government, Wheeler was a lobbyist and lawyer for energy companies such as coal mining giant Murray Energy Corp."

Trump Says He's Completed Answers to Mueller's Questions
8 hours ago
Grassley Will Chair Judiciary Committee, Leave Finance
10 hours ago
DeVos Overhauls Guidance to Colleges on Sex Misconduct Cases
11 hours ago

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos has updated the Obama administration's controversial rules on how colleges handle claims of sexual misconduct by students under Title IX. "The proposed new rules aim to significantly enhance legal protections for the accused, and reflect a sentiment expressed personally by President Trump that men are being unfairly presumed guilty." The rules, which must undergo a public comment period, would allow schools to elevate the burden of proof in sex cases to "clear and convincing evidence." They would also permit cross-examination, and lift time limits on investigations.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.