AGAINST THE GRAIN

Here’s the Real Reason Hillary Clinton Has a Lock on the Democratic Nomination

Support from African-Americans is key, and her would-be challengers aren’t doing much to win it.

Josh Kraushaar
Add to Briefcase
See more stories about...
Josh Kraushaar
July 5, 2015, 4 p.m.

Hil­lary Clin­ton is a near-lock for the Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion for many reas­ons, but among the most sig­ni­fic­ant is that her chal­lengers have min­im­al ap­peal to the party’s base of Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters.

Clin­ton learned firsthand the im­port­ance of their sup­port in 2008, when many of them aban­doned her pres­id­en­tial cam­paign to get be­hind the first vi­able Afric­an-Amer­ic­an pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate.

This time, she should have little con­cern about that: Barack Obama can’t run again, and the can­did­ates who are run­ning haven’t done much to rally Afric­an-Amer­ic­an sup­port.

(RE­LATED: Obama, Em­boldened, Ad­dresses Race as Nev­er Be­fore)

Ver­mont Sen. Bernie Sanders, the chal­lenger with the most mo­mentum, rep­res­ents a state that’s 95 per­cent white, where Asi­an-Amer­ic­ans and multi-ra­cial voters out­num­ber blacks. He’s fo­cused most of his cam­paign mes­sage on in­come in­equal­ity, con­strain­ing Wall Street ex­cess, and cam­paign fin­ance re­form, while avoid­ing dis­cus­sions on race re­la­tions, urb­an poli­cing, or gun con­trol. Only 25 per­cent of non-white Demo­crat­ic voters said they’d even con­sider back­ing the sen­at­or’s pres­id­en­tial bid, ac­cord­ing to last month’s NBC/Wall Street Journ­al sur­vey.

Former Mary­land Gov. Mar­tin O’Mal­ley, des­pite rep­res­ent­ing a state where nearly half of Demo­crat­ic voters are black, has been un­able to make in­roads with his one­time polit­ic­al base. In fact, he drew some jeers when he re­turned to Bal­timore in the wake of vi­ol­ent ri­ot­ing that tore apart the city. As may­or, his tough-on-crime meas­ures were pop­u­lar with Mary­land voters, but the no-tol­er­ance ap­proach ali­en­ated many Afric­an-Amer­ic­an voters in the state’s largest city. Even some of his base-pleas­ing ac­com­plish­ments as gov­ernor—such as his early sup­port for gay mar­riage—hold lim­ited ap­peal with black voters. In a re­cent speech, he awk­wardly com­pared his ex­per­i­ence as a “minor­ity white can­did­ate” for may­or to the broad­er Afric­an-Amer­ic­an ex­per­i­ence.

(RE­LATED: Mar­tin O’Mal­ley: I Wish Bal­timore Got Body Cam­er­as for Cops When I Was May­or)

Mean­while, Clin­ton’s oth­er rival is more con­ser­vat­ive than the en­tire Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial field when it comes to the Con­fed­er­ate flag. Former Sen. Jim Webb, who was the Demo­crats’ Sen­ate ma­jor­ity-maker less than a dec­ade ago, now finds him­self badly out of step with his party on civil rights is­sues. On Face­book, he called for “mu­tu­al re­spect” when con­sid­er­ing the Con­fed­er­ate flag in a way that “re­spects the com­plic­ated his­tory of the Civil War.” He will struggle to make in­roads with minor­it­ies, giv­en how out of step he is with an in­creas­ingly pro­gress­ive Demo­crat­ic base.

Polls in Iowa and New Hamp­shire may show Clin­ton with less-than-com­mand­ing leads over Sanders and every­one else, but take those res­ults with a grain of salt; they don’t mean much go­ing for­ward. Iowa and New Hamp­shire have among the most ho­mo­gen­eous Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ates in the coun­try, demo­graph­ic­ally dis­con­nec­ted from the party’s base in most oth­er states.

(RE­LATED: There’s Something About Sanders)

Even a best-case scen­ario for Clin­ton’s chal­lengers wouldn’t yield any long-term suc­cess. If, say, Sanders car­ried New Hamp­shire, he’d im­me­di­ately need to trans­late that mo­mentum to South Car­o­lina, where Afric­an-Amer­ic­ans make up a ma­jor­ity of the Demo­crat­ic primary vote. It’s al­most im­possible to see Sanders’s sup­port—what polit­ic­al ana­lyst Mi­chael Bar­one calls his “Birken­stock con­stitu­ency”—trans­lat­ing down South. Mean­while in Nevada, where im­mig­ra­tion is the dom­in­ant is­sue among Demo­crat­ic act­iv­ists, Sanders’s re­l­at­ive si­lence on the sub­ject makes him a poor fit. (Sanders helped scuttle George W. Bush’s ef­forts for com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form in 2007, at­tack­ing the bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion for driv­ing down wages for work­ing-class Amer­ic­ans.)

The biggest ques­tion is wheth­er Clin­ton’s un­im­peded path to the nom­in­a­tion is a product of her polit­ic­al strength, or a sign that Demo­crats don’t have any oth­er can­did­ates who can ap­peal to their di­verse con­stitu­ency. If a can­did­ate with stronger ap­peal to minor­ity voters chal­lenged her, would he or she ex­per­i­ence an Obama-style wave of sup­port? Are Clin­ton’s fa­vor­able rat­ings so sol­id be­cause of her lack of com­pet­i­tion, or is her polit­ic­al stand­ing dis­suad­ing oth­ers from run­ning against her? It’s the polit­ic­al ver­sion of the chick­en-and-egg ar­gu­ment.

The an­swer is cru­cial to her strategy in the gen­er­al elec­tion, where she’s seek­ing to re­cre­ate Obama’s old co­ali­tion by try­ing to con­nect to every one of his core con­stitu­en­cies. If Afric­an-Amer­ic­an en­thu­si­asm for Clin­ton comes close to match­ing Obama’s, then the base-first ap­proach will pay di­vidends down the road. But if she’s win­ning non-white voters in the primary by de­fault—run­ning against old white men with lim­ited ties to the rising Demo­crat­ic elect­or­ate—she could face a rude awaken­ing next Novem­ber.

What We're Following See More »
SAVE THOSE PERTAINING TO EXEC BRANCH
Sessions: DOJ Will No Longer Issue Guidance Documents
18 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

"Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Friday the Justice Department will revamp its policy for issuing guidance documents. Speaking at the Federalist Society’s annual conference in Washington Friday, Sessions said the Justice Department will no longer issue guidance that 'purports to impose new obligations on any party outside the executive branch.' He said DOJ will review and repeal any documents that could violate this policy." Sessions said: “Too often, rather than going through the long, slow, regulatory process provided in statute, agencies make new rules through guidance documents—by simply sending a letter. This cuts off the public from the regulatory process by skipping the required public hearings and comment periods—and it is simply not what these documents are for. Guidance documents should be used to explain existing law—not to change it.”

Source:
STARTS LEGAL FUND FOR WH STAFF
Trump to Begin Covering His Own Legal Bills
1 hours ago
THE DETAILS
DISCUSSED THE MATTER FOR A NEW BOOK
Steele Says Follow the Money
3 hours ago
STAFF PICKS

"Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who wrote the explosive dossier alleging ties between Donald Trump and Russia," says in a new book by The Guardian's Luke Harding that "Trump's land and hotel deals with Russians needed to be examined. ... Steele did not go into further detail, Harding said, but seemed to be referring to a 2008 home sale to the Russian oligarch Dmitry Rybolovlev. Richard Dearlove, who headed the UK foreign-intelligence unit MI6 between 1999 and 2004, said in April that Trump borrowed money from Russia for his business during the 2008 financial crisis."

Source:
BRITISH PUBLICIST CONNECTED TO TRUMP TOWER MEETING
Goldstone Ready to Meet with Mueller’s Team
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

"The British publicist who helped set up the fateful meeting between Donald Trump Jr. and a group of Russians at Trump Tower in June 2016 is ready to meet with Special Prosecutor Robert Mueller's office, according to several people familiar with the matter. Rob Goldstone has been living in Bangkok, Thailand, but has been communicating with Mueller's office through his lawyer, said a source close to Goldstone."

Source:
SPEAKING ON RUSSIAN STATE TV
Kislyak Says Trump Campaign Contacts Too Numerous to List
4 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak said on Wednesday that it would take him more than 20 minutes to name all of the Trump officials he's met with or spoken to on the phone. ... Kislyak made the remarks in a sprawling interview with Russia-1, a popular state-owned Russian television channel."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login