The director of the Federal Air Marshal Service told Congress on Thursday that his department is prepared for evolving terror threats despite office closures and employee misconduct.
Roderick Allison appeared before a House Homeland Security subpanel to field concerns that the service is no longer a capable component of U.S. security strategy. “What I see is a viable counterterrorism force that supports the counterterrorism efforts of this government. We may be smaller and leaner, and budget dollars are tight, but we have to do our part,” he said.
The last congressional hearing on the service was three years ago, when the same subcommittee looked into allegations of discrimination and retaliation by supervisors against marshals—a culture described in a Homeland Security Department report as “a great deal of tension, mistrust, and dislike.” Allison responded to questions from lawmakers about the events of 2012, saying that there was “no evidence of widespread discrimination.”
A recent controversy occurred in March, when an air marshal left his loaded handgun in a bathroom stall at Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey, and boarded his assigned flight without the weapon. “You have breaches of protocol,” Allison said of the incident. “This young man, unfortunately, made a mistake, and it’s probably going to cost him.”
There were broader issues on the table, too. Allison informed lawmakers that six field offices will be closed in the next year, with four of them already shuttered. But these personnel are being reassigned to “our most critical” offices to service higher-risk airports and flights. “These closures will not adversely impact our ability to maintain coverage,” he said.
But staffing woes remain. The last class of marshals—about 400 to 500, according to Allison— graduated in 2011, and the service has not been able to afford to field another class. Although its annual budget is $800 million, Allison said that any extra money has gone toward addressing attrition. Nevertheless, a new class is being planned for the near future. “The process is still going on,” he said. “We are going to make another run for next year.”
“Not being able to hire has a detrimental effect on the workforce. There’s a sort of feeling of ‘dying on the vine.’” Allison said. “The workforce is getting older. A lot of people that we hired in the beginning after 9/11, they’re going to be walking out the door in 2020, 2021 “¦ That is the No. 1 issue I would put on my wish list in big, bold letters.”
Allison said the majority of personnel are flying marshals or direct support. The service is facing a 6 percent attrition rate this year.
Lawmakers inquired about the service’s tactical readiness for evolving terror threats. Allison said mission planning is informed by passenger travel patterns, assessed passenger risk, and consideration for locations with known vulnerabilities.
In reply to a question about the seating locations of marshals—particularly the perception that they sit in first-class—Allison said that he “can’t elaborate in an open hearing about our tactical seating. “¦ As a matter of practice, those things are managed to a very high degree. I look forward to having a private conversation with you in a closed setting, and I will give you the full plethora of information with regard to where we sit and why we sit there.”
“Wherever that incident is, we’re going to respond to it” he added.
This article has been updated.
What We're Following See More »
"Even if House Republicans manage to get enough members of their party on board with the latest version of their health care bill, they will face another battle in the Senate: whether the bill complies with the chamber’s arcane ... Byrd rule, which stipulates all provisions in a reconciliation bill must affect federal spending and revenues in a way that is not merely incidental." Democrats should have the advantage in that fight, "unless the Senate pulls another 'nuclear option.'”
The House has passed a one-week spending bill that will avert a government shutdown which was set to begin at midnight. Lawmakers now have an extra week to come to a longer agreement which is expected to fund the government through the end of the fiscal year in September. The legislation now goes to the Senate, where it is expected to pass before President Trump signs it.
President Trump’s portrayal of an effort to funnel more Medicaid dollars to Puerto Rico as a "bailout" is complicating negotiations over a continuing resolution on the budget. "House Democrats are now requiring such assistance as a condition for supporting the continuing resolution," a position that the GOP leadership is amenable to. "But Mr. Trump’s apparent skepticism aligns him with conservative House Republicans inclined to view its request as a bailout, leaving the deal a narrow path to passage in Congress."
Democrats in the House are threatening to shut down the government if Republicans expedite a vote on a bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, said Democratic House Whip Steny Hoyer Thursday. Lawmakers have introduced a one-week spending bill to give themselves an extra week to reach a long-term funding deal, which seemed poised to pass easily. However, the White House is pressuring House Republicans to take a vote on their Obamacare replacement Friday to give Trump a legislative victory, though it is still not clear that they have the necessary votes to pass the health care bill. This could go down to the wire.