In early 2014, I was offered what I will, for the rest of my life, consider an amazing opportunity: the chance to edit National Journal magazine. The job was perfect and daunting all at once. NJ had legendary stature but also faced a massive challenge: Like all print publications, it needed to figure out how to justify its existence in the Internet age.
The past two years have been fun and rewarding not in spite of this challenge, but because of it. While the magazine is ending with this issue, the process of trying to reshape the publication—by putting a new twist on its traditions and emphasizing long-form storytelling and elegant design—yielded many individual pieces and overall issues that my colleagues and I are extremely proud of.
We were quite lucky in at least one sense: As should be clear from reading the recollections of the NJ stalwarts who wrote for this issue, the journalistic tradition that NJ had built up over time—the one that we inherited—was extraordinary. It was a tradition that had, for decades, insisted that the details of policy and politics mattered enormously. That the decision-makers behind the scenes could not be ignored. That there was no shortage of investigative digging to be done in Washington. That reporting and argument could strengthen each other. That a magazine could earn the respect of both conservatives and liberals.
There is one other theme that is abundantly clear from these recollections—and it too is part of the tradition of this place: National Journal has always been a magazine with a streak of idealism. Putting out a weekly is inevitably grueling. If you don’t believe in what you’re doing, the stress and long hours will never seem worth it. Read the remembrances in this issue, and you will have no doubt that generation after generation of NJ writers, editors, and staffers were passionate about their work.
My colleagues and I are no exceptions. We continued to strive, right up until our very last issue, to publish as strong a magazine as possible. I want to thank everyone who was on the magazine’s small team over the past two years; but in particular, I want to acknowledge and thank Andie Coller, the magazine’s brilliant deputy editor, who twice served as acting editor.
All of us are immensely proud to have been part of the National Journal tradition. And we know that the 46-year run of this magazine will be remembered and celebrated for a long time to come.
Editor, National Journal magazine
What We're Following See More »
"Russia wants to charge former Ambassador Michael McFaul and several U.S. intelligence officials with financial crimes, Russian officials revealed Tuesday. Russian President Vladimir Putin broached the topic during his summit with President Trump, when he offered to allow Special Counsel Robert Mueller to attend the questioning of Russian spies accused of conducting cyberattacks against the Democratic Party in 2016. In exchange, Putin’s team wants to question McFaul and at least three National Security Agency officials in connection to a case involving Bill Browder, a hedge fund manager who has led an international effort to impose sanctions on Russian officials implicated in human rights abuses."
With President Trump back from a trip in which he seemed to undermine European alliances while cozying up to Vladimir Putin, the White House has announced that European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker will visit on July 25. According to a statement, the two "will focus on improving transatlantic trade and forging a stronger economic partnership."
"The House Veterans Affairs Committee has launched an investigation into care at the VA’s 133 nursing homes after learning the agency had given almost half of them the lowest possible score in secret, internal rankings. The probe follows an investigation by The Boston Globe and USA TODAY that showed 60 VA nursing homes ... rated only one out of five stars for quality last year in the agency’s own ranking system." Internal documents revealed that "patients in more than two-thirds of VA nursing homes were more likely to suffer pain and serious bedsores than their private sector counterparts, and that "VA nursing homes scored worse than private nursing homes on a majority of key quality indicators, including rates of anti-psychotic drug prescription and decline in daily living skills."