Why I Was An NJ Addict

The magazine you’re holding is one I’ve loved for 45 years.

Dec. 11, 2015, 5 a.m.

This is not a column I’ve looked for­ward to writ­ing. Like de­liv­er­ing a eu­logy for a close friend, it’s an hon­or to be asked, but you hate the reas­on why.

I’ve had a 45-year love af­fair with Na­tion­al Journ­al. In my ju­ni­or year (1970-1971) of high school in Shreve­port, Louisi­ana, our de­bate team re­searched and built our case both for and against the pro­pos­i­tion that Wash­ing­ton “should es­tab­lish, fin­ance, and ad­min­is­ter pro­grams to con­trol air and/or wa­ter pol­lu­tion in the United States.” My part­ner, Gary Jack­son (now an at­tor­ney in Char­lotte, North Car­o­lina), found an art­icle in a Wash­ing­ton-based magazine, Na­tion­al Journ­al, that was au­thor­it­at­ive, ob­ject­ive, and help­ful. We dis­covered that the one-year-old magazine was already highly re­garded in the na­tion’s cap­it­al. Once I moved to Wash­ing­ton for col­lege and be­came an in­tern on Cap­it­ol Hill in Janu­ary 1973, I was ad­dicted. Al­most every place I worked for the next 25 years sub­scribed to Na­tion­al Journ­al.

As much as I loved writ­ing a column at Roll Call for a dozen years, Na­tion­al Journ­al’s pub­lish­er, John Fox Sul­li­van, and own­er, Dav­id Brad­ley, lured me away in 1998. Sul­li­van was the pub­lish­er every journ­al­ist wanted. “Hands-on,” as one alum­nus put it, “roam­ing the news­room, shar­ing gos­sip, en­cour­aging the troops.” An­oth­er re­port­er noted that Sul­li­van “al­ways pro­tec­ted us from pissed-off, power­ful folks or ad­vert­isers who threatened to pull their busi­ness, etc., for some story. He took their flak and nev­er asked us to rein in our re­port­ing.” As for Brad­ley, few people have in­ves­ted as much of their money, heart, and soul in ser­i­ous journ­al­ism as he has in re­vital­iz­ing The At­lantic and Na­tion­al Journ­al.

In those days, Na­tion­al Journ­al oc­cu­pied a unique place in Wash­ing­ton journ­al­ism. Many of its writers, a bit older and more ex­per­i­enced than the city’s usu­al journ­al­ists, were ex­perts in the top­ic or in­sti­tu­tion they covered. Na­tion­al Journ­al was a cross between a think tank and a ser­i­ous magazine on pub­lic policy and polit­ics. If you worked in Con­gress, the ex­ec­ut­ive branch, in­de­pend­ent agen­cies, or for a cor­por­a­tion, trade as­so­ci­ation, labor uni­on, think tank, law firm, or pub­lic re­la­tions com­pany, when Na­tion­al Journ­al wrote about an is­sue or situ­ation that mattered, you read it first.

It’s fool­hardy for me to start men­tion­ing names, among the hun­dreds of journ­al­ists who have writ­ten or ed­ited the magazine or have de­signed or pro­duced it. But it seems al­most crim­in­al not to point out some of the most tal­en­ted. There wasn’t a journ­al­ist in Wash­ing­ton who knew the is­sue of in­ter­na­tion­al trade as well as Bruce Stokes did. On do­mest­ic is­sues, Neal Peirce was the fore­most au­thor­ity on state and loc­al ini­ti­at­ives and polit­ics. (I prob­ably have five or six of his books at home.) If you cared about ag­ri­cul­ture, you wanted to know what Jerry Hag­strom thought and saw. The deep-dive re­port­ing on health care by Mar­ilyn Wer­ber Ser­afini and Ju­lie Kosterl­itz, and by Mar­gie Kr­iz Hob­son on en­ergy and en­vir­on­ment­al is­sues, were must-reads for the pro­fes­sion­als. After the 9/11 at­tacks, na­tion­al se­cur­ity and in­tel­li­gence moved to the fore­front in the magazine, fea­tur­ing fine work by James Kit­field and some young­er re­port­ers, not­ably Shane Har­ris, Sydney Freed­berg, and Siobhan Gor­man.

But Na­tion­al Journ­al wasn’t only about is­sues. It kept watch on polit­ic­al in­sti­tu­tions and the people who ran them. Rich Co­hen covered Con­gress, and the House in par­tic­u­lar, more closely than any­one else. Kirk Vic­tor did the same in the Sen­ate. Burt So­lomon did some great re­port­ing as a colum­nist at the White House and has come back in re­cent months to edit my column and make it far bet­ter than when it was sub­mit­ted. There was only one Stu­art Taylor Jr., a Har­vard Law School gradu­ate whose cov­er­age of the Su­preme Court and con­sti­tu­tion­al law was un­par­alleled. Peter Stone, Carl Can­non, and Alex­is Si­mendinger con­trib­uted ori­gin­al and in­cis­ive re­port­ing about how Wash­ing­ton works.

Many of the best ed­it­ors star­ted out as re­port­ers. Richard Cor­rigan, a le­gend at Na­tion­al Journ­al, died in the of­fice in 1991 (be­fore my time) at age 53. John Moore was an­oth­er tal­en­ted re­port­er and writer. I was for­tu­nate enough to have my column ed­ited for a time by the in­defatig­able and ir­re­press­ible Mi­chael Kelly, who be­came the first Amer­ic­an journ­al­ist killed cov­er­ing the Ir­aq War, at age 46. For much of my ten­ure at NJ, my column was ed­ited by Charlie Green, the top ed­it­or, a soft-spoken but strong lead­er, a lovely man with the pa­tience of Job.

In re­cent years, print journ­al­ism about polit­ics and gov­ern­ment has fallen on harder times. Cable tele­vi­sion and the In­ter­net changed everything. News, in­form­a­tion, and opin­ions are dis­pensed 24/7 and at the speed of light; in-depth ana­lys­is and deep re­port­ing are less ap­pre­ci­ated. In a “high-ve­lo­city” (us­ing Brad­ley’s term) news en­vir­on­ment, a weekly print pub­lic­a­tion cov­er­ing polit­ics can’t sur­vive. As Con­gress has ac­com­plished less and less, few­er ad­vert­isers need to reach the lead­ers on Cap­it­ol Hill. The days of print-based polit­ic­al journ­al­ism are over.

For me, I’ll still be plug­ging away, my fu­ture columns avail­able to Na­tion­al Journ­al mem­bers be­hind a pay wall. I’ll also lead my team at The Cook Polit­ic­al Re­port and give speeches here and there. An era has ended, but life moves on.

What We're Following See More »
SHE IS AMBASSADOR TO CANADA AND A GOP DONOR
Kelly Craft Nominated for UN Post
10 hours ago
THE LATEST
AVOIDS SHUTDOWN WITH A FEW HOURS TO SPARE
Trump Signs Border Deal
1 weeks ago
THE LATEST

"President Trump signed a sweeping spending bill Friday afternoon, averting another partial government shutdown. The action came after Trump had declared a national emergency in a move designed to circumvent Congress and build additional barriers at the southern border, where he said the United States faces 'an invasion of our country.'"

Source:
REDIRECTS $8 BILLION
Trump Declares National Emergency
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"President Donald Trump on Friday declared a state of emergency on the southern border and immediately direct $8 billion to construct or repair as many as 234 miles of a border barrier. The move — which is sure to invite vigorous legal challenges from activists and government officials — comes after Trump failed to get the $5.7 billion he was seeking from lawmakers. Instead, Trump agreed to sign a deal that included just $1.375 for border security."

Source:
COULD SOW DIVISION AMONG REPUBLICANS
House Will Condemn Emergency Declaration
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"House Democrats are gearing up to pass a joint resolution disapproving of President Trump’s emergency declaration to build his U.S.-Mexico border wall, a move that will force Senate Republicans to vote on a contentious issue that divides their party. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said Thursday evening in an interview with The Washington Post that the House would take up the resolution in the coming days or weeks. The measure is expected to easily clear the Democratic-led House, and because it would be privileged, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) would be forced to put the resolution to a vote that he could lose."

Source:
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, DRUG FORFEITURE FUND
Where Will the Emergency Money Come From?
1 weeks ago
THE DETAILS

"ABC News has learned the president plans to announce on Friday his intention to spend about $8 billion on the border wall with a mix of spending from Congressional appropriations approved Thursday night, executive action and an emergency declaration. A senior White House official familiar with the plan told ABC News that $1.375 billion would come from the spending bill Congress passed Thursday; $600 million would come from the Treasury Department's drug forfeiture fund; $2.5 billion would come from the Pentagon's drug interdiction program; and through an emergency declaration: $3.5 billion from the Pentagon's military construction budget."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login