Crude-Oil Exports Emerge as Wild Card in End-of-Year Frenzy

Negotiations over major spending and tax bills include lifting a decades-old ban, but the hurdles are very high.

AP Photo/Eric Gay
Ben Geman
Add to Briefcase
Ben Geman
Dec. 3, 2015, 7:55 p.m.

An oil-in­dustry pri­or­ity that has been sty­mied by Demo­crats could be re­vived in Cap­it­ol Hill ne­go­ti­ations over tax policy and le­gis­la­tion to fund the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment bey­ond mid-Decem­ber.

Re­pub­lic­ans are seek­ing a way to end ma­jor, dec­ades-old re­stric­tions on the ex­port of crude oil pro­duced in the U.S. The na­tion’s oil-pro­duc­tion surge has led oil com­pan­ies, eager to take ad­vant­age of high­er prices on world mar­kets, to ar­gue that the ban is a rel­ic that’s no longer needed.

Sen. Dick Durbin, the cham­ber’s No. 2 Demo­crat, said it’s a “pri­or­ity” for Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell. But it’s un­clear if there’s any polit­ic­al space for a deal that would end the de-facto ex­port ban while do­ing enough to ad­vance Demo­crat­ic pri­or­it­ies on low-car­bon en­ergy and oth­er is­sues.

“There is a wide range of opin­ion [in the Demo­crat­ic caucus], some pro, some con,” Sen. Tim Kaine, a Vir­gin­ia Demo­crat, told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “The ma­jor­ity opin­ion is prob­ably [that] we’d be will­ing to con­sider it if we got some very strong en­ergy-ef­fi­ciency and green­house-gas-re­du­cing pro­vi­sions along with it.”

A Sen­ate Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship aide signaled that Demo­crats would need a lot in re­turn for agree­ing to a lift­ing of the ban. Demo­crats dis­cussed their de­mands at a closed-door meet­ing of their mem­bers Thursday.

“There is a gen­er­al feel­ing that this is a huge, huge wind­fall for oil com­pan­ies and something Re­pub­lic­ans really want, and for us to ex­change that, it would have to be for something big,” the aide said.

The price tag would in­clude jet­tis­on­ing vari­ous GOP-backed policy “riders” on the om­ni­bus that Demo­crats op­pose, such as meas­ures to cur­tail en­vir­on­ment­al reg­u­la­tions and fur­ther ease cam­paign-fin­ance re­stric­tions.

Key en­ergy-re­lated pri­or­it­ies for Demo­crats in­clude long-term ex­ten­sions of cred­its for de­vel­op­ing sol­ar-en­ergy pro­jects, which ex­pire (or in some cases drop sharply) late next year, and wind-en­ergy-pro­ject tax cred­its that lapsed at the end of 2014. They also want re­new­al of a lapsed pro­gram called the Land and Wa­ter Con­ser­va­tion Fund.

There’s at least some sup­port among Demo­crats to re­lax­ing the ex­port ban, which dates back to the oil shocks of the 1970s. In Oc­to­ber, 26 House Demo­crats joined Re­pub­lic­ans to ap­prove a bill end­ing the ban. Demo­crat­ic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, whose state is a ma­jor oil pro­du­cer, has been push­ing col­leagues to sup­port lift­ing the ban.

Sen. Mar­tin Hein­rich, a New Mex­ico Demo­crat, said the dis­cus­sions have fo­cused largely on the an­nu­al year-end bill to ex­tend a suite of busi­ness and per­son­al tax breaks. He told re­port­ers in the Cap­it­ol Thursday that there are “very act­ive con­ver­sa­tions go­ing on.”

Hein­rich pre­vi­ously voted against a pro-ex­ports bill that cleared the En­ergy and Nat­ur­al Re­sources Com­mit­tee on a party-line vote, but signaled that he could sup­port ex­ports if they’re coupled with strong re­new­able-en­ergy in­cent­ives.

“We are look­ing for things that bring people to the table from both sides,” he said. “I think there is a real op­por­tun­ity here. I hope we real­ize it.”

But the sides could well be too far apart. One oil-in­dustry lob­by­ist called it a “long shot.” Sen. John Cornyn, the cham­ber’s No. 2 Re­pub­lic­an, told En­vir­on­ment and En­ergy Pub­lish­ing that Demo­crat­ic de­mands are “pretty greedy” and in­clude re­new­able-en­ergy tax cred­its “in per­petu­ity.” The Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship aide said a five-year ex­ten­sion of the cred­its would be a “floor, not a ceil­ing.”

Still, en­vir­on­ment­al­ists who op­pose crude-oil ex­ports are con­cerned enough to ramp up ef­forts to pre­vent a deal. The Si­erra Club, Pub­lic Cit­izen, and the United Steel­work­ers pressed Sen­ate lead­ers to op­pose pro­vi­sions on the ex­tenders pack­age or om­ni­bus.

The White House de­clined com­ment. The ad­min­is­tra­tion has pre­vi­ously said it would veto le­gis­la­tion that lifts the ex­port ban, and ar­gued that such de­cisions should be left up to the White House.

But back­ers are not giv­ing up.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. Dan Sul­li­van of Alaska said that while he’s un­sure of the status of the talks, he’s hope­ful about find­ing space in the pack­age to con­tin­ue fed­er­al spend­ing after Dec. 11, when cur­rent ap­pro­pri­ations lapse.

“If you look at the tra­ject­ory of where this has been, at least for my 10 months in the Sen­ate, it has gone from kind of ‘no way’ to a lot of in­terest in it,” the fresh­man sen­at­or said in a short in­ter­view. “I think there’s a de­cent shot in terms of the om­ni­bus. I am hope­ful.”

What We're Following See More »
MCCONNELL’S BACK AGAINST THE WALL
Heller, Paul Won’t Vote on Motion to Proceed
12 hours ago
THE LATEST
LESS THAN HOUSE BILL
CBO Says 22 Million More Would Be UNinsured
13 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The Senate bill "would increase the number of people without health insurance by 22 million by 2026, a figure that is only slightly lower than the 23 million more uninsured that the House version would create. Next year, 15 million more people would be uninsured compared with current law...The legislation would decrease federal deficits by a total of $321 billion over a decade."

Source:
BEFORE JULY 4 RECESS
Cornyn Says Health Vote Needed This Week
17 hours ago
THE LATEST
NO LONGER HEADING TO THE UN
Kislyak Being Recalled to Russia
20 hours ago
THE LATEST

"Ending one the most turbulent tenures of a Washington-based ambassador in recent memory, the Kremlin has decided to recall Ambassador to the United States Sergey Kislyak, three individuals familiar with the decision told BuzzFeed News. The decision to bring Kislyak back to Russia rather than appoint him to a senior position at the United Nations in New York, as several outlets previously reported, comes amid investigations by the FBI and Congress into the 66-year-old diplomat’s contacts with President Donald Trump’s top aides during the 2016 presidential campaign."

Source:
COULD COME UNDER MUELLER’S SCRUTINY
Deutsche Bank Gave Kushner a $285 Million Loan in October
1 days ago
THE LATEST

"One month before Election Day, Jared Kushner’s real estate company finalized a $285 million loan as part of a refinancing package for its property near Times Square in Manhattan. The loan came at a critical moment. Kushner was playing a key role in the presidential campaign of his father-in-law, Donald Trump. The lender, Deutsche Bank, was negotiating to settle a federal mortgage fraud case and charges from New York state regulators that it aided a possible Russian money-laundering scheme."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login