Rubio Blames Both Sides for Immigration Stalemate

Add to Briefcase
Rebecca Kaplan
June 22, 2012, 11:53 a.m.

LAKE BUENA VISTA, Fla. — Sen. Marco Ru­bio of Flor­ida, who has been widely dis­cussed as a po­ten­tial vice pres­id­en­tial pick for Mitt Rom­ney, laid in­to both Demo­crats and Re­pub­lic­ans for politi­ciz­ing the im­mig­ra­tion de­bate in a way that he said is stand­ing in the way of re­form.

Ad­dress­ing hun­dreds of His­pan­ic act­iv­ists at a meet­ing of the Na­tion­al As­so­ci­ation of Latino Elec­ted and Ap­poin­ted Of­fi­cials, Ru­bio said he had planned to speak about the eco­nomy and jobs, but he changed his mind to fo­cus on im­mig­ra­tion be­cause “both my head and my heart tell me today, per­haps we are as close as we’ve ever been to a crit­ic­al turn­ing point in the de­bate about im­mig­ra­tion.”

The sen­at­or, whose fam­ily im­mig­rated to the United States from Cuba, said, “It is a power­ful polit­ic­al is­sue. I have seen people use it to raise money. I have seen people take the le­git­im­ate con­cerns about il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion and turn it in­to pan­ic, and turn that pan­ic in­to fear, and an­ger, and turn that an­ger in­to votes and money. I’ve also seen people go in the oth­er dir­ec­tion. Any­one who dis­agrees with their ideas on il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion is anti-im­mig­rant and anti-His­pan­ic. That’s ri­dicu­lous. It’s ri­dicu­lous. Everything is about polit­ics. I’ve seen it firsthand.”

As a res­ult, Ru­bio said, few mem­bers of the Sen­ate are in­ter­ested in work­ing on im­mig­ra­tion re­form with him be­cause they have been “burned” by the is­sue. He had been draft­ing le­gis­la­tion to provide leg­al status for the chil­dren of il­leg­al im­mig­rants who at­tend col­lege or serve in the mil­it­ary. His ef­forts were side­lined a week ago when Pres­id­ent Obama an­nounced that his ad­min­is­tra­tion would stop de­port­ing young il­leg­al im­mig­rants who had ar­rived in the United States be­fore their 16th birth­day, had no crim­in­al his­tory, and pur­sued an edu­ca­tion or mil­it­ary ser­vice.

“The re­ac­tion of many on the left was an im­me­di­ate dis­missal,” Ru­bio said of his pro­pos­al. “I saw people on the left say­ing that I was pro­pos­ing a new three-fifths com­prom­ise, hark­en­ing back to the days when a slave was only three-fifths of a per­son. I was ac­cused of sup­port­ing apartheid.”

It was dif­fer­ent, he said, when Obama achieved es­sen­tially the same goals through ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tion. “Now it’s the greatest idea in the world. I don’t care who gets the cred­it, I don’t, but it ex­poses the fact that this is­sue is all about polit­ics for some people,” he said.

Still, he could not res­ist a few par­tis­an swipes at Obama, who was sched­uled to ad­dress the con­fer­ence on Fri­day af­ter­noon, two hours after Ru­bio.

“I was temp­ted to come here today and rip open the policies of the ad­min­is­tra­tion, and I know in a few mo­ments you’ll hear from the pres­id­ent. I was temp­ted to come here and tell you, ‘Hey, he hasn’t been here in three years. What a co­in­cid­ence—it’s an elec­tion year.’”

Ru­bio’s speech, like one that Rom­ney de­livered at the NA­LEO con­fer­ence on Thursday, re­ceived mod­er­ate but not en­thu­si­ast­ic ap­plause. Still, he seemed to have a deep­er con­nec­tion with the audi­ence, per­haps as a res­ult of be­gin­ning his speech with a few para­graphs of Span­ish prais­ing the group and thank­ing them for hold­ing their con­fer­ence in Flor­ida. Ru­bio also re­coun­ted the story of his grand­fath­er, who came to the United States for a second time on a once-leg­al im­mig­rant visa that had ex­pired after he re­turned to Cuba for more than a year. Des­pite a de­port­a­tion or­der, he was ul­ti­mately al­lowed to stay.


Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.