The Supreme Court may have given President Obama a double victory when it handed down its ruling regarding Arizona’s controversial immigration law.
The Court on Monday not only affirmed the federal government’s right to set immigration policy in striking down three of the four provisions in SB 1070; in upholding the most controversial “show me your papers” component — which requires police to check the legal status of anyone they stop or arrest if they suspect they are here illegally—the high court may also have given a historically reluctant Hispanic electorate a real reason to turn out for the president.
“This [court ruling] is exactly what [Latinos] have been fearful of,” said Gary Segura, a political-science professor at Stanford University and a principal at the polling firm Latino Decisions. “The decision is kind of a win for the Obama administration, but also from the perspective of Latino voters, this [issue] is still a really big deal.”
Even as Democrats have had little else to celebrate in June, the president appears to be on solid political footing with regards to immigration.
Ten days ago, to the delight of Latino activists, he announced that his administration would halt deportations and create a path to legal status for some young immigrants who had been brought to the United States illegally when they were children.
Now the Obama campaign has a powerful case to make when it paints a picture for Latinos about what life under a Republican administration could look like.
The most recent USA Today/Gallup poll shows that Obama has already opened up a wide gulf among Latino voters, leading Republican Mitt Romney by 66 percent to 25 percent and putting Romney in the weakest position with Latinos since Bob Dole in 1996.
But the greater consequence of the Supreme Court’s SB 1070 decision may be mobilization among the Latino community. As their numbers have grown, Latinos have indeed wielded more influence, usually to the benefit of Democrats.
Even so, their power has been muted by traditionally tepid participation compared with other groups. About 21 million Latinos will be eligible to vote in November, but only 10 million are registered. If past serves as precedent, even fewer will vote.
“The big question is turnout,” said GOP strategist Ana Navarro, who advised 2008 Republican nomineeJohn McCain on Latino issues. “Between [Obama’s] Dream policy announcement 10 days ago and this Supreme Court decision, what was a very disillusioned and lethargic base until a couple of weeks ago is now energized.”
(RELATED: Full Battlegrounds 2012 Coverage)
That has the potential to make a difference in a number of swing states in the Southwest — Nevada, Colorado, and New Mexico — where the Latino population has skyrocketed over the past decade. Political analysts have also turned their attention recently to Arizona, a traditionally Republican stronghold that nevertheless has seen a sizable increase in its Latino population and where “show me your papers” actually will be felt. The Obama campaign recently began an aggressive registration effort there.
“I’ve seen polling in the last few weeks coming out of Arizona that show it within the margin of error, which is shocking and would be a real cause of concern for Republicans,” Segura said. “If Democrats can make Arizona competitive, that will be a direct consequence of this law.”
Nevertheless, Arizona-based political analyst Mike O’Neil points out that the Latino vote has been oft-promised and never delivered; 2012 would be a first if Hispanics do turn out in force.
“When you’ve got yourself or your neighbors pulled over on the street to be checked for papers “¦ I think [that] becomes potentially the grist for mobilization,” O’Neil said. “Underscore is on the word potential. They still have to beat the pavements and make it happen.”
The Arizona decision is the second time in two weeks that questions over immigration policy have put Romney in an awkward position. The former Massachusetts governor has been boxed in by his party’s positions on the issue, even as many in the GOP have emphasized the importance of making inroads with Hispanic voters, who are wielding more power at the ballot box with each passing election cycle.
In a sidestep that has marked Romney’s dealings with the issue, he issued a brief statement assailing the president on his policies but didn’t offer much in the way of his own proposals.
“Romney has got to say something more definitive than ‘I’m anti-Obama,’ “ O’Neil said. “Right now, Republicans are talking about building a moat and putting alligators in the water, and Romney’s trying to appear not to be totally terrifying to Hispanics. He has a very delicate dance to pull off with respect to that.”
What We're Following See More »
Eleven days before the presidential inauguration last year, a billionaire Russian businessman with ties to the Kremlin visited Trump Tower in Manhattan to meet with Donald J. Trump’s personal lawyer and fixer, Michael D. Cohen, according to video footage and another person who attended the meeting. In Mr. Cohen’s office on the 26th floor, he and the oligarch, Viktor Vekselberg, discussed a mutual desire to strengthen Russia’s relations with the United States under President Trump, according to Andrew Intrater, an American businessman who attended the meeting and invests money for Mr. Vekselberg."
"The Justice Department asked its internal watchdog to examine if there was any impropriety in the counterintelligence investigation of President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, after the president demanded Sunday that the department investigate the motives behind the inquiry. Earlier Sunday, in one of a series of tweets targeting the probe into whether Trump associates colluded with Russia during the 2016 campaign, Mr. Trump wrote: 'I hereby demand, and will do so officially tomorrow, that the Department of Justice look into whether or not the FBI/DOJ infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!'"