Immigration

Arizona, What to Do About Immigration Law?

Analysis: Put up a fence! Pathway to citizenship! The hackneyed immigration debate ignores bipartisan progress. Really.

US-Mexico Border fence
National Journal
June 28, 2012, 11:51 a.m.

OK, Ari­zona, you now have one-fourth of an im­mig­ra­tion law. What are you go­ing to do about it?

States that have passed laws sim­il­ar to Ari­zona’s — South Car­o­lina, Alabama, Utah, In­di­ana, and Geor­gia — are now on no­tice: En­force the law at your per­il. Moves in Wis­con­sin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Illinois to fol­low Ari­zona may halt.

What the Su­preme Court left of Ari­zona’s S.B. 1070 is a pro­vi­sion al­low­ing state and loc­al law en­force­ment to re­quest doc­u­ment­a­tion if “reas­on­able sus­pi­cion ex­ists that the per­son is an ali­en and un­law­fully present.” Good luck. The high court prac­tic­ally in­vited mi­cro­scop­ic scru­tiny of fu­ture de­ten­tions.

But even if state and loc­al po­lice, in good faith, im­ple­ment this part of the law without re­sort­ing to pro­fil­ing, it will have min­im­al op­er­a­tion­al reach. To prop­erly check a per­son who might be an il­leg­al im­mig­rant, law en­force­ment must run the per­son through the fed­er­al Im­mig­ra­tion and Cus­toms En­force­ment data­base or call ICE to do it. Seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials say “con­cerns re­main” about a bliz­zard of field calls from Ari­zona to check sus­pec­ted ali­ens. But the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment has no plans to de­ploy ad­di­tion­al re­sources to its call cen­ters to handle new waves of doc­u­ment-check­ing calls. “Ari­zona won’t im­pose its im­mig­ra­tion pri­or­it­ies on the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment,” a seni­or of­fi­cial said. “The ad­min­is­tra­tion will ad­here to ex­ist­ing im­mig­ra­tion pri­or­it­ies.”

That doesn’t put Ari­zona back to square one. But it puts it close. The same can be said for states with copycat laws.

Where does that leave us?

With a firm, un­am­bigu­ous de­clar­a­tion that Con­gress and only Con­gress (with the pres­id­ent’s ap­prov­al) can change, im­prove, or oth­er­wise al­ter im­mig­ra­tion policy. Even when states as­sert, as Ari­zona did, that they are act­ing in con­cert with and in ad­vance­ment of un­der­ly­ing fed­er­al im­mig­ra­tion policies, the Court de­clared that the Con­sti­tu­tion’s su­prem­acy clause nul­li­fies all ad hoc state im­mig­ra­tion policy. “Con­gress has the power to pree­mpt state law,” the Court said. Un­til something re­places it, the 1986 Im­mig­ra­tion Re­form and Con­trol Act guides and leg­ally gov­erns fed­er­al im­mig­ra­tion policy, seal­ing off any state freel­an­cing. Un­til Con­gress re­writes that law, the na­tion’s broken im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem will re­main. Frus­trated state gov­ern­ments and the prim­al screams of voters in­censed by costs linked to il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion such as vi­ol­ent crime, edu­ca­tion, and health care must now bank on a sty­mied Con­gress to act.

Sounds hope­less, right?

There’s an­oth­er story about im­mig­ra­tion policy that’s been largely over­looked. It’s the harden­ing bi­par­tis­an con­sensus around bor­der se­cur­ity. Dol­lars con­tin­ue to flow in this dir­ec­tion even amid con­spicu­ous belt-tight­en­ing.  

After Pres­id­ent George W. Bush’s at­tempt at com­pre­hens­ive im­mig­ra­tion re­form failed, Con­gress ad­op­ted a de­fault pre­sump­tion in fa­vor of spend­ing more every year on bor­der con­trol. From 2008 to 2012, Con­gress de­voted $17.8 bil­lion for U.S. Bor­der Patrol agents and equip­ment. From 2006 to 2012, the num­ber of Bor­der Patrol agents has in­creased 73 per­cent (from 12,350 agents to 21,370). The num­ber of agents as­signed to the na­tion’s South­w­est bor­der in­creased 67 per­cent (from 11,032 to 18,415).

The House Home­land Se­cur­ity spend­ing bill for fisc­al 2013 de­votes $11.7 bil­lion to Cus­toms and Bor­der Patrol, $77 mil­lion more than Pres­id­ent Obama re­ques­ted. It also pegs spend­ing for ICE at $5.8 bil­lion, a $142 mil­lion in­crease over Obama’s budget re­quest.

The na­tion now has more Bor­der Patrol agents and ICE de­ten­tion beds (34,000) than at any time in his­tory. For con­text, Bor­der Patrol ap­pre­hen­sions totaled 340,252 in fisc­al 2011. That’s down 53 per­cent from 2008 (due in part to the re­ces­sion and lack of avail­able work). But that num­ber of ap­pre­hen­sions was one-fifth the 2000 total.

Crim­in­al and non­crim­in­al de­port­a­tions are also up. Way up. This, too, is a bi­par­tis­an achieve­ment. The early Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion num­bers on de­port­a­tions were soft and soggy. But they got tough­er as il­leg­al im­mig­ra­tion in­creased and polit­ic­al clam­or arose. In 2002, the num­ber of total de­port­a­tions was 122,587. By 2008, it was 369,221.

The Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion kept up the heat. There were 396,906 de­port­a­tions in 2011, and with four months to go in fisc­al 2012, the num­ber is 269,278. With­in those num­bers is a deep­er story of Obama’s “pri­or­it­iz­a­tion” of de­port­a­tion policy. Crim­in­al de­port­a­tions are up sharply — from 114,415 in 2008 to 216,698 in 2011. Obama of­fi­cials con­tend they fo­cus re­sources on crim­in­als, not law-abid­ing ali­ens who try to con­trib­ute while liv­ing in the shad­ows. That may be a reach. This year’s crim­in­al de­port­a­tion num­bers are down — 138,505 with four months left in the fisc­al year. ICE in­siders say that’s be­cause some of the “crim­in­als” in pre­vi­ous years had traffic vi­ol­a­tions and oth­ers were driv­en back to the bor­der after be­ing caught, but were not sub­ject to im­mig­ra­tion court pro­ceed­ings.

Still, en­force­ment is far from lax. Ari­zona told the coun­try the na­tion’s im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem was dys­func­tion­al. The Su­preme Court ruled its rem­edy un­con­sti­tu­tion­al. On the sur­face, it ap­pears noth­ing works and all is lost. It isn’t. Slow, steady pro­gress is be­ing achieved on the biggest, most uni­fy­ing is­sue in this de­bate — se­cur­ity. The num­bers don’t lie.

This art­icle ap­peared in the Wed­nes­day, June 27, 2012 edi­tion of Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily.

What We're Following See More »
CONCERNED ABOUT A PUBLIC SPECTACLE
Mueller Agrees to Testify, but Only in Private
2 days ago
THE LATEST
FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T BLOCK SUBPOENA OF BANK RECORDS
Trump Loses in Court Again
4 days ago
THE LATEST
SAYS HE CAN'T DO IT WHILE INVESTIGATIONS CONTINUE
Trump Pulls the Plug on Infrastructure
4 days ago
THE LATEST
ADMINISTRATION IS 0-FOR-1 ON STONEWALLING THIS WEEK
Parties Go to Court Today Over Trump Banking Records
4 days ago
THE LATEST
ARRIVAL UNDER "EXTREME SECRECY"
Tillerson Talking to House Foreign Affairs
5 days ago
THE LATEST

"Former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was spotted entering a congressional office building on Tuesday morning for what a committee aide told The Daily Beast was a meeting with the leaders of the House Foreign Affairs committee and relevant staff about his time working in the Trump administration. ... Tillerson’s arrival at the Capitol was handled with extreme secrecy. No media advisories or press releases were sent out announcing his appearance. And he took a little noticed route into the building in order to avoid being seen by members of the media."

Source:
×
×

Welcome to National Journal!

You are currently accessing National Journal from IP access. Please login to access this feature. If you have any questions, please contact your Dedicated Advisor.

Login