Groveling, Backpedaling, and ‘Hugging It Out:’ The Fear of Being Authentic

Long a role model for young Americans, especially women, Hillary Clinton rewards bad-boy behavior.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
Aug. 13, 2014, 5:21 a.m.

Throughout her long ca­reer as a law­yer, a pub­lic wife, and a pub­lic ser­vant, Hil­lary Rod­ham Clin­ton has been a role mod­el for mil­lions of young people, es­pe­cially wo­men, en­ter­ing polit­ics and gov­ern­ment. I hope none of them are pay­ing at­ten­tion now.

The state­ment she is­sued Tues­day to calm an of­fen­ded Obama White House was ex­actly the type of be­ha­vi­or you don’t want your daugh­ters mod­el­ing””grov­el­ing to a thin-skinned boss, eat­ing her own words, and swal­low­ing her pride by “hug­ging it out.”

It’s silly, really, this en­tire Obama versus Clin­ton frame. Barack Obama, Hil­lary Clin­ton, and former Pres­id­ent Bill Clin­ton nev­er looked smal­ler than when they were race- and sex-bait­ing dur­ing the 2008 Demo­crat­ic nom­in­a­tion fight. They nev­er looked big­ger than when they covered the scars and formed a genu­ine “Team of Rivals” in the Obama White House.

Now they’re back to the petty. And over what? Hil­lary Clin­ton’s cri­ti­cism of Obama was fair and smart””and it might even be right. She re­buked his for­eign policy prin­ciple of “Don’t do stu­pid shit,” ar­guing that Obama should have armed the Syr­i­an rebels to pre­vent the cre­ation and growth of an Is­lam­ic state.

She didn’t call him an idi­ot. She didn’t say he was a bad lead­er. In fact, she praised the pres­id­ent more than she cri­ti­cized him, and her cri­tique gave Obama an op­por­tun­ity to bet­ter ex­plain his for­eign policy prin­ciples. Who doesn’t want what Obama plans to do about this scary new world or­der?

In­stead, he ac­ted like a typ­ic­al politi­cian. Mr. Hope-and-Change dialed the 20th cen­tury and sicced his at­tack dogs on Clin­ton. His top con­sult­ant, Dav­id Axel­rod, tied her to Pres­id­ent George Bush’s de­cision to in­vade Ir­aq, as if none of what’s oc­curred in the Mideast these past six years is Obama’s re­spons­ib­il­ity.

I made a mis­take at the end of my column Tues­day, “The Au­da­city to Be Au­then­t­ic: Hil­lary Clin­ton’s Risky Hedge Against Obama.” For the first 16 para­graphs, I chal­lenged con­ven­tion­al wis­dom that Clin­ton was dis­tan­cing her­self from Obama and that do­ing so was an ob­vi­ous polit­ic­al vic­tory. I noted that Clin­ton’s re­marks, con­sist­ent with her long-held in­ter­ven­tion­ist views, ac­tu­ally ran counter to those of a ma­jor­ity of the pub­lic, es­pe­cially the Demo­crat­ic base. Why would she be will­ing to do that? “Call me naïve,” I con­cluded “but maybe Clin­ton is simply be­ing hon­est.”

I was naïve.

A few hours after that column pos­ted, Clin­ton is­sued this state­ment through a spokes­per­son:

Earli­er today, the Sec­ret­ary called Pres­id­ent Obama to make sure he knows that noth­ing she said was an at­tempt to at­tack him, his policies or his lead­er­ship. Sec­ret­ary Clin­ton has at every step of the way touted the sig­ni­fic­ant achieve­ments of his pres­id­ency, which she is honored to have been part of as his sec­ret­ary of State. While they’ve had hon­est dif­fer­ences on some is­sues, in­clud­ing as­pects of the wicked chal­lenge Syr­ia presents, she has ex­plained those dif­fer­ences in her book and at many points since then. Some are now choos­ing to hype those dif­fer­ences but they do not ec­lipse their broad agree­ment on most is­sues. Like any two friends who have to deal with the pub­lic eye, she looks for­ward to hug­ging it out when she they see each oth­er to­mor­row night.

There are sev­er­al prob­lems with her state­ment.

  • It’s in­ac­cur­ate. Clin­ton cer­tainly did cri­ti­cize some of Obama’s policies, most dir­ectly with the “stu­pid stuff” for­mu­la­tion.
  • It’s in­con­sist­ent. She denies at­tack­ing “him, his policies or his lead­er­ship,” and two sen­tences later notes “hon­est dif­fer­ences.” If you can’t be hon­est about “hon­est dif­fer­ences,” what are you go­ing to be hon­est about?
  • It’s bor­der­line de­mean­ing, like a sub­or­din­ate try­ing to get back in the boss’s good graces. Clin­ton is an ac­com­plished per­son who has chal­lenged glass ceil­ings. She shouldn’t have to come even close to apo­lo­giz­ing for her opin­ions.
  • It’s too cute by half, too Clin­to­nian. She’s try­ing to dis­tin­guish her policies from Obama’s without up­set­ting all the pres­id­ent’s men. She can’t have it all.

For young people who might be pay­ing at­ten­tion to polit­ics, I hope they don’t take away the wrong les­sons. They’re already abandon­ing gov­ern­ment and polit­ics in alarm­ing num­bers.

Clin­ton didn’t make a mis­take chal­len­ging a male au­thor­ity fig­ure. She wasn’t wrong to speak her mind. Her as­pir­a­tions are not de­pend­ent on her “hug­ging it out.” The les­son here is to be true to your­self. Stick to your guns. Be au­then­t­ic. After all, that’s really what Amer­ic­ans want in a lead­er.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5163) }}

What We're Following See More »
HE ‘WILL NEVER BE PRESIDENT’
Warren Goes After Trump Yet Again
3 hours ago
THE LATEST

When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage. 

FIRST CHANGE IN FOUR DECADES
Congress Passes Chemical Regulations Overhaul
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."

Source:
NO MORE INDEPENDENT VOTERS?
GOP Could Double Number of Early Primaries
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."

Source:
LEVERAGE
Kasich Tells His Delegates to Remain Pledged to Him
8 hours ago
THE LATEST

Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."

Source:
EFFECTIVE NEXT MONTH
House GOP Changes Rules for Spending Measures
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Speaker Paul Ryan is changing the rules of how the House will consider spending measures to try to prevent Democrats from offering surprise amendments that have recently put the GOP on defense. ... Ryan announced at a House GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning that members will now have to submit their amendments ahead of time so that they are pre-printed in the Congressional Record, according to leadership aides." The change will take effect after the Memorial Day recess.

Source:
×