Hillary Clinton on Benghazi Scandal: ‘It’s More of a Reason to Run’

6 things we learned from Hillary Clinton’s interview with Diane Sawyer.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
June 9, 2014, 7:02 p.m.

Get ready to hear a lot from Hil­lary Clin­ton. 

With the re­lease of her book, Hard Choices, Tues­day, Clin­ton will be run­ning the me­dia gaunt­let, talk­ing to re­port­ers across the broad­cast spec­trum and on cable. Her first stop was an hour-long (preta­ped) in­ter­view with Di­ane Saw­yer on ABC on Monday night. Saw­yer’s ques­tions covered a wide range: from Clin­ton’s per­spect­ive on be­ing a fe­male pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate, to her health, and, of course, her hand­ling of the Septem­ber 11, 2012, at­tack on the U.S. Con­su­late in Benghazi. Ex­pect sim­il­ar ques­tions throughout the me­dia tour. (Also ex­pect sim­il­ar an­swers.)

While Clin­ton said she would not be mak­ing a de­cision to run for pres­id­ent this year, 2016 was in­es­cap­able. In the D.C. TV mar­ket, at least, an anti-Hil­lary Clin­ton ad ran dur­ing the broad­cast.

Though Clin­ton didn’t make any out­right news dur­ing the broad­cast, it was an in­ter­est­ing op­por­tun­ity to listen to her com­ment on the cur­rent head­lines cir­cu­lat­ing around her. 

Here’s what we learned. 

1. The Benghazi scan­dal will not dis­suade Clin­ton from run­ning in 2016. If any­thing, she said, it will mo­tiv­ate her, be­cause she be­lieves law­makers are us­ing the is­sue for petty polit­ic­al gains. And the coun­try is bet­ter than that.

Ac­tu­ally, it’s more of a reas­on to run. I do not be­lieve our great coun­try should be play­ing minor league ball. We ought to be in the ma­jors. I view this as really apart from, even a di­ver­sion from, the hard work that the Con­gress should be do­ing about the prob­lems fa­cing our coun­try and the world.

2. She feels that she, per­son­ally, could not have in­ter­vened to in­crease se­cur­ity at the Benghazi com­pound.

Well, I cer­tainly would give any­thing on Earth if this had not happened, and I cer­tainly would wish that we had made some of the changes that came to our at­ten­tion to make as a res­ult of the in­vest­ig­a­tion…. We had a sys­tem, and that sys­tem of course ended with me. I take re­spons­ib­il­ity, but i was not mak­ing se­cur­ity de­cisions.

I think it would be a mis­take for a sec­ret­ary of State to sit and say, okay, let’s go through all 270 posts and let me de­cide what should be done. That, to me, is in­ap­pro­pri­ate where the ex­per­i­ence and the ex­pert­ise lies else­where.

3. Her 2012 con­cus­sion and sub­sequent blood clot have left no linger­ing ef­fects on her health. Yet, she’ll (prob­ably) be on blood thin­ners for life to pre­vent fur­ther clots.

Saw­yer: So no linger­ing af­fects of any kind.

Clin­ton: No linger­ing af­fects.

Saw­yer: You would re­lease your med­ic­al re­cords if you ran for pres­id­ent?

Clin­ton: I would do what oth­er can­did­ates have done, ab­so­lutely.

Saw­yer: What would you like to say to Karl Rove about your brain?

Clin­ton: That I know he was called Bush’s brain in one of the books writ­ten about him, and I wish him well.

4. Rand Paul can bring up Mon­ica Lew­in­sky all he likes. Just watch out.

You know, he can talk about whatever he wants to talk about. If he de­cides to run, he’ll be fair game, too, for every­body.

5. On bat­tling her im­age as be­ing “scrip­ted, cau­tious, safe, ar­mored.”

I un­der­stand why some people might have seen that or cer­tainly at­trib­uted that, be­cause when you’re in the spot­light as a wo­man, you know you’re be­ing judged con­stantly. I mean, it is just nev­er-end­ing. And you get a little wor­ried about, okay, people over on this side are lov­ing what I’m wear­ing, look­ing like, say­ing. People over on this side aren’t. Your nat­ur­al tend­ency is how do you bring people to­geth­er so that you can bet­ter com­mu­nic­ate. I’m done with that. I mean, I’m just done.

Saw­yer: You said you’re just over it?

Clin­ton: I am over it, over it. I think I have changed — not worry so much about what oth­er people are think­ing and my view is, I have lived an in­cred­ibly blessed life.

Saw­yer: Time for rad­ic­al candor?

Clin­ton: I love that phrase. If you don’t mind, I’ll use it. I think for me it’s time. I don’t know that I could have done it earli­er, be­cause i was cer­tainly try­ing to find my way.

6. After Bill Clin­ton’s term in of­fice was up, the Clin­tons were in debt, and “struggled” to put to­geth­er re­sources for “houses.”

Well, you have no reas­on to re­mem­ber, but we came out of the White House not only dead broke but in debt. We had no money when we got there, and we struggled to piece to­geth­er the re­sources for mort­gages for houses, for Chelsea’s edu­ca­tion. It was not easy. Bill has worked really hard, and it’s been amaz­ing to me. He’s worked very hard. First of all, we had to pay off all our debts … we had to make double the money be­cause of, ob­vi­ously, taxes and pay off the debts and get us houses and take care of fam­ily mem­bers.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 5017) }}

What We're Following See More »
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
1 days ago

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."