Here’s One Way to Encourage Voting: Free Weed

San Jose marijuana club wants to turn out the vote.

Marijuana leaves. 
National Journal
Elahe Izadi
June 3, 2014, 7:21 a.m.

The priv­ilege of par­ti­cip­at­ing in a free, demo­crat­ic elec­tion should be reas­on enough to vote for most Amer­ic­ans. Get­ting free burri­tos or cof­fee for sport­ing “I Voted” stick­ers sweetens the deal. But San Jose is one-up­ping all of that with the prom­ise of weed for voters in Tues­day’s primary elec­tions.

Top that, Star­bucks.

The marijuana, for card-car­ry­ing med­ic­al marijuana users only, comes cour­tesy of the Sil­ic­on Val­ley Can­nabis Co­ali­tion as part of its “Weed for Votes” cam­paign. Just show up at par­ti­cip­at­ing can­nabis clubs with an “I Voted” stick­er or bal­lot stub to qual­i­fy for dis­coun­ted or free marijuana.

SVCC wants to en­cour­age voters to get out and cast votes for “can­nabis-friendly” can­did­ates run­ning for city of­fice, such as coun­cil mem­bers and the may­or. The sher­iff and state’s at­tor­ney are also on the bal­lot, and the group’s voter guide makes it clear who they want in of­fice.

No marijuana-spe­cif­ic meas­ure ap­pears on the bal­lot, but pro-can­nabis act­iv­ists want to mo­bil­ize their base to back can­did­ates who they feel take “reas­on­able” ap­proaches to marijuana policy. The city is in the middle of con­sid­er­ing in­creas­ing reg­u­la­tions on med­ic­al marijuana.

“We have a huge op­por­tun­ity to make a large im­pact in who runs San Jose,” SVCC dir­ect­or John Lee said in a state­ment. “Al­though we may not have reg­u­la­tions on the June bal­lot, in­sur­ing the right politi­cians are elec­ted is even more im­port­ant.”

The polit­ic­al im­pact of play­ing up marijuana is something Demo­crats have been eye­ing as a way to help them in a midterm cycle, when they typ­ic­ally struggle to get their base out to vote. Some polling sug­gests that marijuana bal­lot ini­ti­at­ives will help boost turnout, par­tic­u­larly among young­er voters. Take Col­or­ado or Wash­ing­ton, where turnout among 18- to 29-year-olds spiked in 2012 when pot-leg­al­iz­a­tion ap­peared on the bal­lot. But that didn’t hap­pen in Cali­for­nia; youth turnout as a share of the elect­or­ate ac­tu­ally dropped in 2010, when a marijuana leg­al­iz­a­tion meas­ure ap­peared on the bal­lot.

But is San Jose’s pot giveaway even leg­al? Well, the marijuana is only for those who already have med­ic­al marijuana cards. And the Santa Clara County Dis­trict At­tor­ney’s Of­fice has said in a state­ment that the of­fer on its face doesn’t ap­pear to vi­ol­ate Cali­for­nia’s vote-buy­ing law, which bans try­ing to in­flu­ence voters with the prom­ise of things like free money, gifts, and em­ploy­ment. But, de­pend­ing on how the of­fer plays out, it could still vi­ol­ate state or even fed­er­al law, es­pe­cially since there are fed­er­al can­did­ates on the bal­lot.

The num­ber of small and large busi­nesses and cor­por­a­tions who of­fer free­bies to voters on Elec­tion Day has boomed in re­cent pres­id­en­tial cycles. Those giveaways do ap­pear to vi­ol­ate fed­er­al elec­tion law.

One easy way to avoid get­ting in­to leg­al troubles is to give the free stuff to all people, re­gard­less of wheth­er they voted. Al­though just giv­ing away pot to every­body who has a med­ic­al-marijuana card in San Jose would surely pose plenty of prob­lems of its own. Like, sup­ply-and-de­mand-type prob­lems.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×