The Intellectual Dishonesty of Obama and Other False Purists

Yes, the GOP is obstinate. We get it. But assigning the White House some blame is no false equivalence.

National Journal
Ron Fournier
May 27, 2014, 5:28 a.m.

To voters angry at Wash­ing­ton, Pres­id­ent Obama has an ex­plan­a­tion for the deep­en­ing of grid­lock, in­com­pet­ence, and zero-sum gain think­ing dur­ing his five-plus years in of­fice: It’s not his fault.

Not that fin­ger-point­ing solves any­thing, but Obama wants you to know that it was Re­pub­lic­ans and the me­dia who put his pres­id­ency on ice. At a fun­draiser in Chica­go on Thursday night, Obama said:

“You’ll hear if you watch the nightly news or you read the news­pa­pers that, well, there’s grid­lock, Con­gress is broken, ap­prov­al rat­ings for Con­gress are ter­rible.  And there’s a tend­ency to say, a plague on both your houses.  But the truth of the mat­ter is that the prob­lem in Con­gress is very spe­cif­ic.  We have a group of folks in the Re­pub­lic­an Party who have taken over who are so ideo­lo­gic­ally ri­gid, who are so com­mit­ted to an eco­nom­ic the­ory that says if folks at the top do very well then every­body else is some­how go­ing to do well; who deny the sci­ence of cli­mate change; who don’t think mak­ing in­vest­ments in early-child­hood edu­ca­tion makes sense; who have re­peatedly blocked rais­ing a min­im­um wage so if you work full-time in this coun­try you’re not liv­ing in poverty; who scoff at the no­tion that we might have a prob­lem with wo­men not get­ting paid for do­ing the same work that men are do­ing.

“They, so far, at least, have re­fused to budge on bi­par­tis­an le­gis­la­tion to fix our im­mig­ra­tion sys­tem, des­pite the fact that every eco­nom­ist who’s looked at it says it’s go­ing to im­prove our eco­nomy, cut our de­fi­cits, help spawn en­tre­pren­eur­ship, and al­le­vi­ate great pain from mil­lions of fam­il­ies all across the coun­try.

“So the prob­lem “¦ is not that the Demo­crats are overly ideo­lo­gic­al — be­cause the truth of the mat­ter is, is that the Demo­crats in Con­gress have con­sist­ently been will­ing to com­prom­ise and reach out to the oth­er side.  There are no rad­ic­al pro­pos­als com­ing out from the left.  When we talk about cli­mate change, we talk about how do we in­centiv­ize through the mar­ket great­er in­vest­ment in clean en­ergy.  When we talk about im­mig­ra­tion re­form there’s no wild-eyed ro­man­ti­cism.  We say we’re go­ing to be tough on the bor­ders, but let’s also make sure that the sys­tem works to al­low fam­il­ies to stay to­geth­er “¦

“When we talk about taxes we don’t say we’re go­ing to have rates in the 70 per­cent or 90 per­cent when it comes to in­come like ex­is­ted here 50, 60 years ago.  We say let’s just make sure that those of us who have been in­cred­ibly blessed by this coun­try are giv­ing back to kids so that they’re get­ting a good start in life, so that they get early child­hood edu­ca­tion.”¦ Health care — we didn’t sud­denly im­pose some wild, crazy sys­tem.  All we said was, let’s make sure every­body has in­sur­ance. And this made the oth­er side go nuts — the simple idea that in the wealth­i­est na­tion on Earth, nobody should go bank­rupt be­cause some­body in their fam­ily gets sick, work­ing with­in a private sys­tem.

“So when you hear a false equi­val­ence that some­how, well, Con­gress is just broken, it’s not true.  What’s broken right now is a Re­pub­lic­an Party that re­peatedly says no to proven, time-tested strategies to grow the eco­nomy, cre­ate more jobs, en­sure fair­ness, open up op­por­tun­ity to all people.”

Obama could be for­giv­en for try­ing to mo­tiv­ate his lib­er­al base with dis­tor­ted and over­heated rhet­or­ic, if it wasn’t clear that he ac­tu­ally means it. 

The truth is that both parties are ideo­lo­gic­ally ri­gid. Un­bend­ing is the nature of a polit­ic­al parties, es­pe­cially when voters them­selves are sort­ing in­to “red” and “blue” teams; when com­puter-as­sisted re­dis­trict­ing and oth­er struc­tur­al factors en­cour­age par­tis­an­ship; and when the me­dia in­dustry is be­ing pushed (and is push­ing voters) to polit­ic­al ex­tremes.

Obama can reas­on­ably ar­gue that the Re­pub­lic­an Party is more ri­gid than the Demo­crat­ic Party. I would agree, and I don’t hes­it­ate to hold the GOP ac­count­able for po­s­i­tions that place the party on the wrong side of his­tory and demo­graph­ic trends.

But it’s my be­lief that Obama has over­stated his obstacles to suc­cess on taxes, im­mig­ra­tion, cli­mate change, and oth­er is­sues. The can­did­ate of un­bridled op­tim­ism in 2008 is now cyn­ic­al, bowed, and nearly beaten — a lead­er whose ex­cuse for fail­ure amounts to, I can’t lead be­cause Re­pub­lic­ans won’t let me. By the way, that is not a con­ser­vat­ive talk­ing point; it’s rooted in dozens of con­ver­sa­tions I’ve had in the past 17 months with Demo­crats.

Greg Sar­gent, a lib­er­al writer for the Wash­ing­ton Post, an­ti­cip­ated my re­sponse in a post Fri­day:

This will prompt the Green Lan­tern­ite pun­dits, who con­tin­ue to trace the prob­lem to Obama’s fail­ure to move Con­gress, to ar­gue that he is merely mak­ing ex­cuses for fail­ure. I would note, though, that in his re­marks, he also said the only rem­edy for the prob­lem is for Demo­crats to vote out Re­pub­lic­ans, which is to say, it’s on Demo­crats to fix by win­ning elec­tions “¦

Sar­gent makes a reas­on­able point. However, Demo­crats had con­trol of both cham­bers of Con­gress when Obama took of­fice in 2009, and most voters wer­en’t happy with the res­ult. Fur­ther­more, Sar­gent’s pre­scrip­tion for a bet­ter state of polit­ics is ex­actly what’s wrong with the sys­tem. “Win­ning elec­tions” is all the mat­ters in Wash­ing­ton. Obama prom­ised bet­ter.

Sar­gent’s col­league Dan Balz quoted Obama at the Chica­go fun­draiser in his Sunday column and reached a dif­fer­ent con­clu­sion:

There is truth to the pres­id­ent’s claim that a fac­tion of the Re­pub­lic­an Party has forced House GOP lead­ers to res­ist com­prom­ise and that the party’s con­front­a­tion­al hard-liners have changed the rules on Cap­it­ol Hill.

But there are Re­pub­lic­ans on Cap­it­ol Hill who are not ideo­lo­gic­al hard-liners and who lament what they re­gard as a pres­id­ent and White House seni­or staff who have grown in­creas­ingly with­drawn. They hear what Obama said Thursday and are of­fen­ded. They think he does not try to un­der­stand the reas­ons they dif­fer with his policies, be­liev­ing he simply prefers to por­tray them all as heart­less and cap­tured by the tea party.

Obama chafes at such even-handed ana­lyses. He dis­misses them as “false equi­val­ence” be­cause the pres­id­ent won’t be happy un­til every news story casts him as the hero and Re­pub­lic­ans as the vil­lains.

In polit­ics and in every­day life, rarely are both sides equally wrong, which is why journ­al­ists shouldn’t draw false equi­val­ence. Balz is an ex­ample of how to meas­ure blame fairly, not ne­ces­sar­ily equally.

Rarer still is one side 100 per­cent right, which is why Obama is guilty of false pur­ity. Obama’s in­tel­lec­tu­al dis­hon­esty has pre­ven­ted him from learn­ing on the job, which is what’s re­quired of great pres­id­ents — the kind who over­come obstacles that oth­ers whine about.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4971) }}

What We're Following See More »
WEST WING REDUX
Allison Janney Takes to the Real White House Podium
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Carolyn Kaster/AP

STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
12 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
15 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
×