Yesterday, when the Obama administration unveiled a number of proposals that would relax restrictions on foreign workers and their spouses, Chuck Grassley was all verklempt.
“The Obama administration claims it wants immigration reform, but they can’t wait for Congress. They act on their own,” Grassley, a top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said on the Senate floor, according to his prepared remarks. “What’s next? Will the president unilaterally legalize the undocumented population because he can’t have his way with Congress?”
Grassley’s feeling that the president is overstepping his powers in revamping immigration policy via executive action is something of a change of heart. Back in June of 2008, when President George W. Bush used an executive order to require federal contractors to participate in the Homeland Security Department’s E-Verify system, Grassley was all for it.
Appearing on CNN’s Lou Dobbs Tonight several days after the announcement in 2008, Grassley voiced his support for Bush’s action, saying, “It’s so important that the president do that,” since Grassley would have put something similar in legislation of his own if the president hadn’t. “It’s quite a victory to get it done by executive,” Grassley said at the time.
Grassley deserves points for ideological consistency on immigration, and his office argues that the situation was different — that there was clear authority in the law for every employer to use E-Verify, including the federal government. “President Obama’s executive orders, on prosecutorial discretion for H-1Bs for example, fall, in Senator Grassley’s opinion, outside the constrictions of existing law,” his spokeswoman, Beth Levine, wrote in an email. “Senator Grassley wishes the president would use his executive authority to benefit American workers, instead of working to their detriment.” Bush, the logic goes, was merely requiring what the law already authorized.
The upshot though, was that Bush took a law Congress established as a voluntary system in 1996 and greatly expanded the program’s reach, affecting at least several hundred thousand workers a year nationwide, according to The New York Times‘ estimates. The real difference then, was that Obama’s proposal uses executive authority to make life a little easier for foreign workers, and Bush was using it to do something Grassley agrees with. It would behoove Grassley to just say so.
What We're Following See More »
Paul Ryan told CNN today he's "not ready" to back Donald Trump at this time. "I'm not there right now," he said. Ryan said Trump needs to unify "all wings of the Republican Party and the conservative movement" and then run a campaign that will allow Americans to "have something that they're proud to support and proud to be a part of. And we've got a ways to go from here to there."
In The New Yorker, Jeffrey Toobin gives Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the longread treatment. The scourge of corrupt New York pols, bad actors on Wall Street, and New York gang members, Bharara learned at the foot of Chuck Schumer, the famously limelight-hogging senator whom he served as a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee staff. No surprise then, that after President Obama appointed him, Bharara "brought a media-friendly approach to what has historically been a closed and guarded institution. In professional background, Bharara resembles his predecessors; in style, he’s very different. His personality reflects his dual life in New York’s political and legal firmament. A longtime prosecutor, he sometimes acts like a budding pol; his rhetoric leans more toward the wisecrack than toward the jeremiad. He expresses himself in the orderly paragraphs of a former high-school debater, but with deft comic timing and a gift for shtick."
President Obama has announced another round of commutations of prison sentences. Most of the 58 individuals named are incarcerated for possessions with intent to distribute controlled substances. The prisoners will be released between later this year and 2018.
The Daily Beast has unearthed a piece that Donald Trump wrote for Gear magazine in 2000, which anticipates his 2016 sales pitch quite well. "Perhaps it's time for a dealmaker who can get the leaders of Congress to the table, forge consensus, and strike compromise," he writes. Oddly, he opens by defending his reputation as a womanizer: "The hypocrites argue that a man who loves and appreciates beautiful women (and does so legally and openly) shouldn't become a national leader? Is there something wrong with appreciating beautiful women? Don't we want people in public office who show signs of life?"