How Obama Lost the Millennial Generation

Despite promise, Obama’s presidency fails to inspire young Americans to serve through politics and government.

  United States President Barack Obama arrives on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. following a day trip to Colorado Springs, Colorado to view damage from wildfires and to thank the responders battling the blazes on Friday, June 29, 2012. Credit: Ron Sachs / Pool via CNP United States President Barack Obama arrives on the South Lawn of the White House in Washington, D.C. following a day trip to Colorado Springs, Colorado to view damage from wildfires and to thank the responders battling the blazes on Friday, June 29, 2012.  
National Journal
Ron Fournier
April 29, 2014, 5:42 a.m.

Barack Obama in­spired a gen­er­a­tion of young Amer­ic­ans to shed their apathy and cyn­icism to vote in re­cord num­bers and trans­form Wash­ing­ton, where gov­ern­ment ser­vice would be­come a noble call­ing. Or at least that was the 2008 spin.

The real­ity is pathet­ic­ally dif­fer­ent.

A com­pre­hens­ive ana­lys­is of 18- to 29-year-old Amer­ic­ans — the “mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion” — paints the Obama pres­id­ency as a squandered op­por­tun­ity to con­vert en­thu­si­asm for com­munity ser­vice in­to polit­ic­al com­mit­ment.

Ac­cord­ing to Har­vard Uni­versity’s In­sti­tute of Polit­ics, mil­len­ni­als’ lack of trust in Amer­ic­an in­sti­tu­tions con­tin­ues to drop, even be­low his­tor­ic­ally low num­bers re­cor­ded a year ago. The in­sti­tute’s latest poll shows de­clin­ing faith in:

  • The pres­id­ency (32 per­cent, down 7 points since 2013);
  • The U.S. mil­it­ary (47 per­cent, down 7);
  • Con­gress (14 per­cent, down  4);
  • The Su­preme Court (36 per­cent, down 4);
  • The fed­er­al gov­ern­ment (20 per­cent, down 2).

Since 2010, there has been a 6-point jump in the per­cent­age of young Amer­ic­ans who agree that “elec­ted of­fi­cials seem to be mo­tiv­ated by selfish reas­ons” (62 per­cent) and that “polit­ic­al in­volve­ment rarely has any tan­gible res­ults” (29 per­cent).

Mil­len­ni­als have in­creas­ingly soured on polit­ics and gov­ern­ment as a way to serve. Just 29 per­cent agreed that “the idea of work­ing in some form of pub­lic ser­vice is ap­peal­ing to me,” down 2 points since a year ago. Only 32 per­cent said run­ning for of­fice is an “hon­or­able thing to do,” a 3-point drop.

These are jar­ring res­ults in light of a broad range of stat­ist­ics show­ing young Amer­ic­ans are in­volved in com­munity ser­vice and vo­lun­teer­ism at far high­er rates than baby boomers and Gen­er­a­tion X. Mil­len­ni­als are eager to serve, just not in gov­ern­ment or polit­ics.

“Young people still care about our coun­try,” said Har­vard IOP poll­ster John Della Volpe, “but we will likely see more vo­lun­teer­ism than vot­ing in 2014.”

It wasn’t al­ways this way. After the Sept. 11, 2001 ter­ror­ist strikes, the IOP noted a surge in in­sti­tu­tion­al sup­port among col­lege stu­dents (the poll ex­pan­ded in later years to in­clude young adults not in col­lege): 59 per­cent for the pres­id­ent, 69 per­cent for the mil­it­ary, 54 per­cent for Con­gress, and 52 per­cent for the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment. The Ir­aq war rocked their faith in most in­sti­tu­tions, and by 2006 only 33 per­cent of col­lege stu­dents ex­pressed sup­port for the pres­id­ency. Thirty per­cent ex­pressed sup­port for Con­gress and 35 per­cent for the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment.

Obama’s elec­tion briefly re­newed young Amer­ic­ans’ faith in the pres­id­ency and oth­er in­sti­tu­tions, Della Volpe said, but those rat­ings are now as low as they were un­der Pres­id­ent Bush in 2006.

“Obama had a mo­ment, we all had a mo­ment, between the 2007 and the 2010 midterm elec­tions, to en­gage the largest gen­er­a­tion in U.S. his­tory, and we didn’t do it,” the poll­ster said. “We treated them like any oth­er polit­ic­al con­stitu­ency, and not like the ser­vice-minded cit­izens they are, and there­fore we dis­ap­poin­ted mil­lions of Amer­ic­ans.”

Is this Obama’s fault? Does the blame lie with House Re­pub­lic­ans who ob­struc­ted his agenda? Or is the prob­lem sys­tem­ic, big­ger than any one politi­cian or party? The an­swer is yes, all of the above.

Mil­len­ni­als des­pise par­tis­an­ship and grid­lock, ac­cord­ing to a wide vari­ety of polls, and they have little pa­tience for the in­ef­fi­cien­cies of a sprawl­ing bur­eau­cracy built for 20th-cen­tury needs. Des­pite his prom­ises, Obama failed to tame par­tis­an­ship or mod­ern­ize gov­ern­ment.

“I def­in­itely feel among the kids I talk to and work with a grow­ing mix of dis­en­gage­ment and — it’s too strong to call it be­tray­al — but a deep dis­ap­point­ment with the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion in par­tic­u­lar,” said Nicco Mele, a Har­vard pro­fess­or who over­saw the ground­break­ing di­git­al strategy for 2004 Demo­crat­ic can­did­ate Howard Dean.

In ad­di­tion to Obama’s ex­pan­sion of Bush-era sur­veil­lance pro­grams, Mele said the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s about-face on net neut­ral­ity “is something I heard a lot of an­ger about just in the last week.”

Mele’s boss on the Dean cam­paign, Demo­crat­ic con­sult­ant Joe Trippi, said the prob­lem is that, for young Amer­ic­ans, the two-party sys­tem is clearly stale and ir­rel­ev­ant. “Mil­len­ni­als more than any gen­er­a­tion un­der­stand that both pre­vail­ing ideo­lo­gies might as well be in caves talk­ing how to start fires,” he said. “They’re look­ing for oth­er ways to make a dif­fer­ence.”

Rather than go in­to gov­ern­ment, the best and bright­est of the mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion are us­ing tech­no­logy to help people and com­munit­ies, es­sen­tially cre­at­ing mi­cro-in­sti­tu­tions that meet so­cial needs and gen­er­ally make a profit. The move­ment is called “so­cial en­tre­pren­eur­ship.”

Michelle Diggles, an ex­pert in gen­er­a­tion­al polit­ics for the Demo­crat­ic think tank Third Way, cited polls show­ing an ex­plo­sion of self-iden­ti­fied in­de­pend­ents among mil­len­ni­als. “They’re really up­set with the fight­ing and grid­lock and lack of abil­ity to get any­thing done,” she said.

The great un­known, as I wrote here for The At­lantic, is wheth­er young Amer­ic­ans are per­man­ently lost to the polit­ic­al sys­tem — with grim con­sequences for demo­cracy. Or do they at some point de­cide to im­pose vast in­sti­tu­tion­al re­forms on cam­paigns and gov­ern­ment? For in­stance, mod­er­at­ing the ef­fects of House re­dis­trict­ing and for­cing bil­lion­aire donors out of the shad­ows of cam­paigns would be a level of dis­rup­tion akin to what mil­len­ni­als have em­braced for the re­tail, en­ter­tain­ment, and me­dia in­dus­tries.

They may blame Obama for not lead­ing the way, Trippi said, but mil­len­ni­als know the prob­lem is big­ger than one man. “Most mil­len­ni­als I’ve talked to have come to the real­iz­a­tion that send­ing one guy to change the town or change the gov­ern­ment wasn’t enough,” he said. “It’s the sys­tem. You have to change everything.”

Nobody can fault Obama alone for fail­ing to change Wash­ing­ton. But that’s not his only sin: He be­came a part of the sys­tem; he got held host­age by it; and he sur­rendered to it. Which is why he may be re­membered not for los­ing the mil­len­ni­al gen­er­a­tion as much as for blow­ing a pre­cious op­por­tun­ity to win it.

RE­LATED: “Meh: Mil­len­ni­als Skip­ping Midterm Elec­tions”

Fourni­er serves on the Har­vard In­sti­tute of Polit­ics ad­vis­ory board

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4911) }}

What We're Following See More »
Leading Republicans Would Say ‘No Thanks’ If Asked to Be Trump’s VP
1 hours ago

Nikki Haley. Jeb Bush. Scott Walker. Lindsey Graham. John Kasich. The list is growing ever longer of Republicans who say they wouldn't even consider becoming Donald Trump's running mate. "The recoiling amounts to a rare rebuke for a front-runner: Politicians usually signal that they are not interested politely through back channels, or submit to the selection process, if only to burnish their national profiles."

Trump Decisively Ahead in Indiana
1 hours ago

"Donald Trump holds a 15-point lead over Ted Cruz in the potentially decisive May 3 presidential primary race in Indiana, according to results from a new NBC News/Wall Street Journal/Marist poll. Trump gets support from 49 percent of likely Republican primary voters — followed by Cruz at 34 percent and John Kasich at 13 percent. If that margin in Indiana holds on Tuesday, Trump would be on a glide path towards obtaining the 1,237 delegates he needs to win the Republican nomination on a first ballot at the GOP convention in July."

Obamas’ Eldest Daughter Will Attend Harvard
1 hours ago

In a statement released on Sunday, President and Mrs. Obama revealed that their oldest daughter, Malia, will attend Harvard University in the fall of 2017 as a member of the Class of 2021. She will take a year off before beginning school.

When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
2 days ago

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
2 days ago

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”