Coloradans Are Cool With Smoking Pot — Unless You’re a Politician

Voters think the state’s marijuana experiment is going well.

Two joints are displayed during a joint rolling class at Hempfest on April 20, 2014 in Seattle, Washington.
National Journal
Emma Roller
See more stories about...
Emma Roller
April 29, 2014, 7:51 a.m.

A new poll from Quin­nipi­ac Uni­versity found that Col­or­ado res­id­ents are cool with their state’s new marijuana law. But that hardly means they’re ready to sup­port politi­cians who take ad­vant­age of it.

The Col­oradans sur­veyed had a rosy view of the state’s marijuana-leg­al­iz­a­tion law, which went in­to ef­fect Jan. 1. Most voters think the law will bring tax rev­en­ue in­to the state — in­deed, the state is pro­jec­ted to raise nearly $100 mil­lion from marijuana sales this year. They also be­lieve the law has helped Col­or­ado’s crim­in­al-justice sys­tem, and that it “in­creases per­son­al freedoms in a pos­it­ive way.” Al­most half of voters ad­mit­ted to us­ing marijuana at some point in their lives. While most voters over­all sup­port the law — 54 per­cent to 43 per­cent — the only sub­sets who don’t think the law is good for the state are Re­pub­lic­ans and voters over the age of 65. But to those naysay­ers, most Col­oradans are say­ing, “Don’t harsh my mel­low, bro.”

Still, that doesn’t mean Col­oradans are com­fort­able with the idea of their elec­ted of­fi­cials tok­ing up. More than half of the poll’s re­spond­ents — 52 per­cent — said they’d be less likely to vote for a polit­ic­al can­did­ate who smokes marijuana “two or three days a week.” Forty-three per­cent said a can­did­ate’s marijuana use would not af­fect their vote, while 3 per­cent said it would make them more likely to vote for the can­did­ate.

And it shows there are still rad­ic­ally dif­fer­ent at­ti­tudes to­ward al­co­hol versus marijuana. Just look at Col­or­ado Gov. John Hick­en­loop­er, who was a beer en­tre­pren­eur be­fore he was elec­ted. If a ma­jor­ity of voters were wor­ried about can­did­ates who drink beer “two or three days a week,” we’d be forced to live in an an­arch­ic so­ci­ety.

To be fair, voters hold polit­ic­al can­did­ates to high­er stand­ards than what’s leg­al — or voters’ own mor­al codes. Adul­tery isn’t il­leg­al, either, but it has ended many a polit­ic­al ca­reer non­ethe­less. Oth­er acts of im­pro­pri­ety can have a severe im­pact on how voters view their rep­res­ent­at­ives.

Mor­al rectitude is im­port­ant to voters, and while they can abide by their neigh­bors get­ting blazed after a long day of work, politi­cians might want to lay off the mind-al­ter­ing sub­stances. So sorry, Tommy Chong. Bet­ter luck next elec­tion cycle.

What We're Following See More »
GOP Budget Chiefs Won’t Invite Administration to Testify
21 hours ago

The administration will release its 2017 budget blueprint tomorrow, but the House and Senate budget committees won’t be inviting anyone from the White House to come talk about it. “The chairmen of the House and Senate Budget committees released a joint statement saying it simply wasn’t worth their time” to hear from OMB Director Shaun Donovan. Accusing the members of pulling a “Donald Trump,” White House spokesman Josh Earnest said the move “raises some questions about how confident they are about the kinds of arguments that they could make.”

Snowstorm Could Impact Primary Turnout
17 hours ago

A snowstorm is supposed to hit New Hampshire today and “linger into Primary Tuesday.” GOP consultant Ron Kaufman said lower turnout should help candidates who have spent a lot of time in the state tending to retail politicking. Donald Trump “has acknowledged that he needs to step up his ground-game, and a heavy snowfall could depress his figures relative to more organized candidates.”

A Shake-Up in the Offing in the Clinton Camp?
12 hours ago

Anticipating a primary loss in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Hillary and Bill Clinton “are considering staffing and strategy changes” to their campaign. Sources tell Politico that the Clintons are likely to layer over top officials with experienced talent, rather than fire their staff en masse.