A new poll from Quinnipiac University found that Colorado residents are cool with their state’s new marijuana law. But that hardly means they’re ready to support politicians who take advantage of it.
The Coloradans surveyed had a rosy view of the state’s marijuana-legalization law, which went into effect Jan. 1. Most voters think the law will bring tax revenue into the state — indeed, the state is projected to raise nearly $100 million from marijuana sales this year. They also believe the law has helped Colorado’s criminal-justice system, and that it “increases personal freedoms in a positive way.” Almost half of voters admitted to using marijuana at some point in their lives. While most voters overall support the law — 54 percent to 43 percent — the only subsets who don’t think the law is good for the state are Republicans and voters over the age of 65. But to those naysayers, most Coloradans are saying, “Don’t harsh my mellow, bro.”
Still, that doesn’t mean Coloradans are comfortable with the idea of their elected officials toking up. More than half of the poll’s respondents — 52 percent — said they’d be less likely to vote for a political candidate who smokes marijuana “two or three days a week.” Forty-three percent said a candidate’s marijuana use would not affect their vote, while 3 percent said it would make them more likely to vote for the candidate.
And it shows there are still radically different attitudes toward alcohol versus marijuana. Just look at Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper, who was a beer entrepreneur before he was elected. If a majority of voters were worried about candidates who drink beer “two or three days a week,” we’d be forced to live in an anarchic society.
To be fair, voters hold political candidates to higher standards than what’s legal — or voters’ own moral codes. Adultery isn’t illegal, either, but it has ended many a political career nonetheless. Other acts of impropriety can have a severe impact on how voters view their representatives.
Moral rectitude is important to voters, and while they can abide by their neighbors getting blazed after a long day of work, politicians might want to lay off the mind-altering substances. So sorry, Tommy Chong. Better luck next election cycle.
What We're Following See More »
When it comes to name-calling among America's upper echelon of politicians, there may be perhaps no greater spat than the one currently going on between Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump. While receiving an award Tuesday night, she continued a months-long feud with the presumptive GOP presidential nominee. Calling him a "small, insecure moneygrubber" who probably doesn't know three things about Dodd-Frank, she said he "will NEVER be president of the United States," according to her prepared remarks."We don't know what Trump pays in taxes because he is the first presidential nominee in 40 years to refuse to disclose his tax returns. Maybe he’s just a lousy businessman who doesn’t want you to find out that he’s worth a lot less money than he claims." It follows a long-line of Warren attacks over Twitter, Facebook and in interviews that Trump is a sexist, racist, narcissistic loser. In reply, Trump has called Warren either "goofy" or "the Indian"—referring to her controversial assertion of her Native American heritage.
The House on Tuesday voted 403-12 "to pass an overhaul to the nation’s chemical safety standards for the first time in four decades. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act aims to answer years of complaints that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks the necessary authority to oversee and control the thousands of chemicals being produced and sold in the United States. It also significantly clamps down on states’ authorities, in an effort to stop a nationwide patchwork of chemical laws that industry says is difficult to deal with."
"Leaders of the Republican Party have begun internal deliberations over making fundamental changes to the way its presidential nominees are chosen, a recognition that the chaotic process that played out this year is seriously flawed and helped exacerbate tensions within the party." Among the possible changes: forbidding independent voters to cast ballots in Republican primaries, and "doubling the number of early states to eight."
Citing the unpredictable nature of this primary season and the possible leverage they could bring at the convention, John Kasich is hanging onto his 161 delegates. "Kasich sent personal letters Monday to Republican officials in the 16 states and the District of Columbia where he won delegates, requesting that they stay bound to him in accordance with party rules."
"Speaker Paul Ryan is changing the rules of how the House will consider spending measures to try to prevent Democrats from offering surprise amendments that have recently put the GOP on defense. ... Ryan announced at a House GOP conference meeting Tuesday morning that members will now have to submit their amendments ahead of time so that they are pre-printed in the Congressional Record, according to leadership aides." The change will take effect after the Memorial Day recess.