Rand Paul has had a good year.
Last April, the Kentucky Republican made it onto Time’s list of the 100 most influential people with an endorsement from Sarah Palin, who noted that she “sent him some caribou jerky from Alaska” to help give him strength.
This year, Paul appears on the Time 100 again. But instead of getting an entry written by a politician on the decline, Paul’s endorsement comes from the lawmaker who leads the Republican Party in the Senate, and could well wind up as the chamber’s majority leader in less than a year.
Paul, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell writes, is “beating the bushes for anyone who prizes liberty, and he’s forcing people to rethink the Republican Party.” McConnell also got in a semi-veiled dig at one of Paul’s potential 2016 competitors, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas, by praising Paul for not speaking ill of his fellow Republicans. McConnell’s come a long way from supporting Paul’s primary opponent in 2010. The Time entry itself is titled “The libertarian champion,” and is just about as raving a review as you’d ever see one politician give another.
It’s especially raving compared with how Paul endorsed McConnell for his Senate campaign this year. Because, while McConnell may need Paul in his reelection fight, Paul isn’t necessarily publicly pleading for the leader’s support.
In Paul’s telling, McConnell isn’t quite beating any shrubbery of freedom. When asked by Glenn Beck back in February why Paul was endorsing the minority leader in his GOP primary, Paul said he was going to campaign for McConnell because “he asked me when there was nobody else in the race.” Paul later clarified that he sees McConnell as “an important ally and a conservative voice in Washington.” Paul followed up that endorsement by dodging a question about it at a community forum last week in Kentucky.
In response to the Time 100 endorsement, a spokesperson for Rand Paul said that the senator “is excited to be a part of the national debate and is very appreciative of the kind words from his friend and colleague Sen. McConnell.”
As Paul spends more and more time crafting his national image ahead of a possible presidential campaign, it’s clear that he’s interested in more power and influence than McConnell could possibly give him in the Senate. But McConnell, in his courtship of the libertarian wing of his party, still has a lot to gain from Paul. Writing glowing tributes in a major national magazine may be a good start.
This article was updated with comment on Time 100 from Sen. Paul’s office.
What We're Following See More »
Not since Eagles fans booed Santa Claus have this many people been dismayed at Philadelphia. Traffic gridlock, poor logistics, and the inevitable summer heat and thunderstorms are drawing the ire of convention goers, as "peeved" delegates complained about "Homerian odysseys" to get from place to place. "On Twitter, out-of-town media complained about the logistics of the convention, spread out between the sports complex in South Philadelphia, media tents a hike away, and the daytime events at the Convention Center in Center City."
"Two attackers killed a priest with a blade and seriously wounded another hostage in a church in northern France on Tuesday before being shot dead by French police. The attack took place during morning mass at the Saint-Etienne parish church, south of Rouen in Normandy. Five people were initially taken hostage." The case has been referred to anti-terrorism officials in Paris.
"Sometimes, unity is procedural. Mr. Sanders’s delegates will get the chance to back him in a roll-call vote from the convention floor on Tuesday, a largely symbolic gesture intended to recognize the breadth of Mr. Sanders’s support as the former rival campaigns negotiate an awkward peace." Around 6 p.m., they'll begin calling the states to vote. Sanders won't be in a generous mood—at least at the beginning. Last night from the stage, he said, "I look forward to your votes during the roll call tomorrow night." Indeed, in 2008, Clinton herself insisted on a roll call, before halting it "midway through, asking that Mr. Obama be approved by acclamation."
Instead of his usual stump speech, Bernie Sanders tonight threw his support behind Hillary Clinton, providing a clear contrast between Clinton and GOP nominee Donald Trump on the many issues he used to discuss in his campaign stump speeches. Sanders spoke glowingly about the presumptive Democratic nominee, lauding her work as first lady and as a strong advocate for women and the poor. “We need leadership in this country which will improve the lives of working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the poor,” he said. “Hillary Clinton will make a great president, and I am proud to stand with her tonight."
In a stark contrast from Michelle Obama's uplifting speech, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren spoke about the rigged system plaguing Americans before launching into a full-throated rebuke of GOP nominee Donald Trump. Trump is "a man who has never sacrificed anything for anyone," she claimed, before saying he "must never be president of the United States." She called him divisive and selfish, and said the American people won't accept his "hate-filled America." In addition to Trump, Warren went after the Republican Party as a whole. "To Republicans in Congress who said no, this November the American people are coming for you," she said.