Mississippi Is Still the Worst State for Elections

According to a new survey.

National Journal
Brian Resnick
See more stories about...
Brian Resnick
April 9, 2014, 7:40 a.m.

In 2012, life in Mis­sis­sippi might have got­ten bet­ter, but it’s still the worst state in the coun­try for elec­tions, ac­cord­ing to a new sur­vey from Pew Char­it­able Trusts.

Pew cre­ates a com­pos­ite “Elec­tions Per­form­ance In­dex” based on 17 factors (some of which in­clude vot­ing-wait time, turnout, re­gis­tra­tion rate, the ro­bust­ness of the state’s elec­tion data, avail­ab­il­ity of on­line vot­ing in­form­a­tion, and use of pro­vi­sion­al bal­lots). Read the full list of cri­ter­ia here. Taken to­geth­er, they provide a ground to com­pare states, which have vary­ing elec­tion laws and prac­tices.

The av­er­age score of all states in­creased from 2008 to 2012, and vot­ing-wait times na­tion­ally ac­tu­ally de­creased by about three minutes.

But “Mis­sis­sippi had the low­est EPI av­er­age in all three years meas­ured by the in­dex: 2008, 2010, and 2012,” the re­port states. You can see Mis­sis­sippi on this plot of every state’s scores (com­par­ing per­form­ance in 2008 to 2012). Click for a lar­ger view. From this, you can also get a gen­er­al sense of which states are ex­cel­ling in elec­tions, and those that are fail­ing be­hind.

(Pew)

Pew points to the lack of elec­tron­ic re­cords as the ill that’s hold­ing the worst-per­form­ing states back. For one, it re­com­mends these states ad­opt on­line voter re­gis­tra­tion: It en­sures ac­cur­ate re­cords from the start — no in­ac­curacies from poor hand­writ­ing — which de­creases the use of pro­vi­sion­al bal­lots and gives voters a simple way to chage their re­cords.

Check out Pew’s com­plete in­ter­act­ive com­par­ing the states here.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.

Source:
×