Equal Pay Takes Center Stage as a Democratic Campaign Issue

Here’s what female Democratic candidates are saying about equal pay. Spoiler: It’s a united front.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
See more stories about...
Lucia Graves
April 8, 2014, 1:32 p.m.

Noth­ing riles the Re­pub­lic like dis­putes over equal pay. And Demo­crat­ic politi­cians, think­ing they have the edge in the ar­gu­ment, have been diving in­to those con­ver­sa­tions — first in Texas, then in Wash­ing­ton, and now all across the coun­try as midterm elec­tions heat up.

Last week Demo­crat­ic gubernat­ori­al can­did­ate Wendy Dav­is ex­cor­i­ated her Re­pub­lic­an com­pet­it­or At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Greg Ab­bott for op­pos­ing le­gis­la­tion that would help work­ers file wage-dis­crim­in­a­tion claims. This week the Obama White House an­nounced ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions to help fed­er­al fe­male con­tract­ors while top Demo­crats touted the Paycheck Fair­ness Act. And Tues­day, more than a dozen Demo­crat­ic wo­men ad­ded their names to the list of can­did­ates stress­ing their al­le­gi­ance to fight­ing for paycheck-fair­ness le­gis­la­tion. (The rub: Wo­men make 77 to 82 per­cent of what men make, de­pend­ing on the met­ric you use.)

“This is ex­actly the kind of thing that really hurts our kids and our fu­ture,” said Aman­da Rentería, a con­gres­sion­al can­did­ate in Cali­for­nia’s 21st Dis­trict, on a Tues­day con­fer­ence call with re­port­ers. “And it couldn’t be more dif­fer­ent between Con­gress­man [Dav­id] Valadao and I when it comes to fight­ing for wo­men and for mak­ing sure our fam­il­ies can really provide for their fam­il­ies and for our fu­ture.”

Leti­cia Van de Putte, a can­did­ate for lieu­ten­ant gov­ernor of Texas, echoed that sen­ti­ment. “Why would any­one want their sons to get paid more for the same job, for the same work?” she asked. “We love our chil­dren equally.”

A quick sur­vey of can­did­ates sup­por­ted by EMILY’s List, the group that helps fund and groom fe­male can­did­ates who back abor­tion rights, shows such rhet­or­ic is nearly uni­ver­sal. “Equal Pay Day has drawn a clear out­line of the dif­fer­ence between the two parties,” EMILY’s List spokes­wo­man Marcy Stech told Na­tion­al Journ­al in a state­ment. “In state after state EMILY’s List can­did­ates are out on the trail talk­ing to voters who know that it’s well past time to end gender dis­crim­in­a­tion in pay while Re­pub­lic­ans are fum­bling the ball on a com­mon­sense solu­tion.”

One such can­did­ate is Ann Cal­lis, a Demo­crat run­ning for of­fice in Illinois’ 13th dis­trict. In a Tues­day in­ter­view with WCIA 3’s Cyn­thia Bruno, she urged law­makers to vote yes on the Paycheck Fair­ness Act and raise the min­im­um wage. An­oth­er is Hawaii’s Colleen Hanabusa, who’s run­ning for U.S. Sen­ate. In a Tues­day op-ed, Hanabusa ar­gued pay equity and a high­er min­im­um wage will help wo­men, fam­il­ies, com­munit­ies, and the na­tion.

Emily Cain, a Demo­crat run­ning in Maine’s 2nd Dis­trict, sim­il­arly soun­ded her sup­port. “Re­pub­lic­ans in Con­gress have blocked equal-pay le­gis­la­tion and mocked the ba­sic fair­ness and equal­ity that work­ing wo­men and their fam­il­ies de­serve,” Cain said in a state­ment pos­ted Tues­day. “We need to end this gender dis­crim­in­a­tion in pay and start re­ward­ing equal work with equal pay im­me­di­ately.”

In the North Car­o­lina Sen­ate race, Demo­crat­ic in­cum­bent Kay Hagan made her feel­ings known and con­tras­ted them with her likely op­pon­ent Thom Tillis’s po­s­i­tion. “Giv­en Tillis’s ac­tions on the state equal-pay meas­ure, North Car­olini­ans can only as­sume that he op­poses the Paycheck Fair­ness Act and the Lilly Led­bet­ter Fair Pay Act, which is already law,” she wrote Tues­day. “As more and more fam­il­ies rely on wo­men’s in­come as the primary or co-bread­win­ner, this isn’t just an is­sue that af­fects wo­men — it has an im­pact on middle-class fam­il­ies and chil­dren in every corner of our state where wo­men earn just 82 cents to the dol­lar that men earn.”

In Cali­for­nia’s 31st Dis­trict, Eloise Gomez Reyes called it “a fight to im­prove eco­nom­ic se­cur­ity for mil­lions of chil­dren in Amer­ica liv­ing in house­holds that de­pend on the moth­ers’ earn­ings to make ends meet.” In Flor­ida’s 2nd, Gwen Gra­ham called Re­pub­lic­an re­cal­cit­rance on the is­sue “ex­actly the kind of thing North Flor­idi­ans can’t stand about Wash­ing­ton’s out-of-touch pri­or­it­ies.” And in Iowa’s 3rd, Staci Ap­pel vowed to “fight to end gender dis­crim­in­a­tion in pay in Con­gress and build an eco­nomy that works for all of Iowa’s fam­il­ies.”

Ken­tucky Sen­ate can­did­ate Al­is­on Lun­der­gan Grimes went on of­fense, not­ing her op­pon­ent, Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, had twice voted to pre­vent wo­men from seek­ing re­course for the pay dis­crim­in­a­tion.

These wo­men are just a hand­ful of the Demo­crat­ic can­did­ates hop­ing to mo­bil­ize fe­male voters, an im­port­ant vot­ing block in 2014 and bey­ond. While many have noted the ves­ted in­terest Demo­crats have in woo­ing fe­male voters (in 2012, Pres­id­ent Obama won wo­men voters by 11 points), oth­ers have gone even fur­ther, sug­gest­ing the ef­fort is noth­ing more than a “des­per­ate” elec­tion ploy.

Lily Adams, deputy com­mu­nic­a­tions dir­ect­or for the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee, dis­missed the no­tion. “It’s not about scor­ing polit­ic­al points,” she told re­port­ers on Tues­day’s call. “It’s about ba­sic fair­ness.”

Up­date: An earli­er ver­sion of this story con­tained a com­ment from Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell that Talk­ing Points Memo had con­strued as cri­ti­cism of the Demo­crats’ fo­cus on pay equity is­sues. As TPM is now re­port­ing, Mc­Con­nell’s of­fice has since said that TPM mis­con­strued his com­ments and that he was ac­tu­ally talk­ing about the Demo­crats’ fo­cus on the Koch broth­ers. As a res­ult, Mc­Con­nell’s com­ment has been re­moved from this story.

What We're Following See More »
Trump Jr. Meeting with GOP Members
1 minutes ago
US Nukes Rely on Decades-Old Tech
3 minutes ago
Eleven States Sue Administration Over Transgender Bathroom Access
2 hours ago

The great restroom war of 2016 continues apace, as eleven states have sued the Obama administration in federal court, claiming its federal guidance on how schools should accommodate transgender students "has no basis in law." "The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on behalf of Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Maine, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has worked to turn workplaces and schools 'into laboratories for a massive social experiment.'"

Puerto Rico Debt Bill Passes House Committee
2 hours ago

By a 29-10 vote, the House Natural Resources Committee today passed the bill to allow Puerto Rico to restructure its $70 billion in debt. The legislation "would establish an oversight board to help the commonwealth restructure its un-payable debt and craft an economic recovery plan."

Wyden Bill Would Make Nominees’ Tax Disclosures Mandatory
2 hours ago

"Though every major party nominee since 1976 has released his tax returns while running for president, the practice has never been required by law. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR) wants to change that. The senior Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, which handles tax issues, introduced a bill on Wednesday that would force presidential candidates to release their most recent tax returns. The Presidential Tax Transparency Act, as the bill is called, would require candidates to make their latest three years of tax returns public no later than 15 days after becoming the nominee."