Iowa Democrat Dismisses Chuck Grassley As ‘A Farmer From Iowa Who Never Went to Law School’

Senate candidate Rep. Bruce Braley has a “47 percent” moment at a Texas fundraiser.

Rep. Bruce Braley says that Sen. Chuck Grassley belongs more in this field than the Senate Judiary Committee.
National Journal
Matt Vasilogambros
March 25, 2014, 10:57 a.m.

If there’s one thing that can­did­ates should have learned from the 2012 elec­tion sea­son, it’s to watch what they say in closed-door fun­draisers. One Iowa Demo­crat ap­par­ently didn’t get the memo.

While at­tempt­ing to court a group of law­yers at a South Texas fun­draiser, Rep. Bruce Bra­ley took a swipe at Sen. Chuck Grass­ley by warn­ing of a pos­sible Re­pub­lic­an Sen­ate ma­jor­ity after the midterms.

“You might have a farm­er from Iowa who nev­er went to law school, nev­er prac­ticed law, serving as the next chair of the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee,” Bra­ley said in a video re­leased by the con­ser­vat­ive Amer­ica Rising PAC. “Be­cause, if Demo­crats lose the ma­jor­ity, Chuck Grass­ley will be the chair of the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee.”

{{third­PartyEmbed type:you­tube id:QH51L­NpqZ94}}

Grass­ley is the rank­ing mem­ber of that com­mit­tee. Bra­ley, who prac­ticed law be­fore join­ing the House, told the crowd he would be someone on the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee with “your back­ground, your ex­per­i­ence, your voice, someone who’s been lit­er­ally fight­ing tort re­form for 30 years.”

The video may have been re­cor­ded without Bra­ley’s know­ledge, sim­il­ar to Mitt Rom­ney’s now-in­fam­ous “47 per­cent” video that may have in part cost him some voters in the last pres­id­en­tial elec­tion. And it could have a sim­il­ar ef­fect in this elec­tion for Bra­ley.

Bra­ley is seen as the de facto Demo­crat­ic nom­in­ee in the race to suc­ceed re­tir­ing Sen. Tom Har­kin, a Demo­crat who held his seat since 1985. His un­chal­lenged primary is in stark con­trast to the Re­pub­lic­an race that has be­come one of the messi­est in the coun­try.

Des­pite Iowa’s cent­rist tend­en­cies, Bra­ley is heav­ily favored to win, and wasn’t con­sidered a ma­jor pickup op­por­tun­ity for Re­pub­lic­ans. That may change now, thanks to this video.

UP­DATE:

After the video was re­leased, Bra­ley re­leased an apo­logy in a state­ment.

“I apo­lo­gize to Sen­at­or Grass­ley and any­one I may have of­fen­ded,” Bra­ley said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al. “I re­spect Sen­at­or Grass­ley and en­joy our work­ing re­la­tion­ship even though we dis­agree on some is­sues.”

Bra­ley made a point to men­tion farm­ers in the rest of his state­ment, cit­ing his fam­ily ties to farm­ing and say­ing the work he has done “hand in hand with Iowa farm­ers” has helped “grow Iowa’s farm eco­nomy and cre­ate good pay­ing Iowa farm jobs.”

He con­tin­ues: “I have tre­mend­ous re­spect for Iowa farm­ers and ap­pre­ci­ate how im­port­ant they are to our state, and I’m grate­ful to have the sup­port of hun­dreds of farm­ers across Iowa.”

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
4 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
4 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
5 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×