The Club for Growth Grows Up

The fiscally conservative group that pioneered the practice of challenging moderates in primaries is now working with the establishment — warily.

Chris Chocola, the President of the Club for Growth, speaks with reporters at the offices of the National Journal and Hotline on Wednesday, August 17, 2011.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
March 25, 2014, 5:31 p.m.

Be­fore the tea party even ex­is­ted, there was the Club for Growth. The fisc­ally con­ser­vat­ive group made a name for it­self in the last dec­ade by chal­len­ging mod­er­ate in­cum­bents in primar­ies, a strategy that’s been im­it­ated by oth­ers in re­cent years. Last year, it backed state Treas­urer Richard Mour­dock’s primary chal­lenge to Sen. Richard Lugar and com­plained about long­time Sen. Or­rin Hatch’s re­cord. To kick off 2013, the group named 10 squishy House Re­pub­lic­ans it hoped to chal­lenge in primar­ies.

But since then, the group has dialed back its pug­nacious­ness and played ball with party lead­ers. Com­pared with its up­start rivals, the Club’s tac­tics this cycle have been down­right es­tab­lish­ment-friendly. While act­iv­ists waged war against Sen­ate Minor­ity Lead­er Mitch Mc­Con­nell, the Club de­clined to back his op­pon­ent. In a press re­lease, it even praised the six-term in­cum­bent’s vot­ing re­cord and de­fense of First Amend­ment rights.

This month, the group un­ex­pec­tedly en­dorsed Alaska Sen­ate can­did­ate Dan Sul­li­van, who rates as the favored choice of Re­pub­lic­ans in Wash­ing­ton. In sup­port­ing him, the Club passed over the man it en­dorsed in 2010, Joe Miller, who is once again seek­ing the party’s nom­in­a­tion. It backed only three chal­lengers to sit­ting Re­pub­lic­an law­makers so far this cycle, few­er than its con­ser­vat­ive com­pet­it­ors. And it has poured money in­to Arkan­sas, in sup­port of the Na­tion­al Re­pub­lic­an Sen­at­ori­al Com­mit­tee’s lead­ing Sen­ate re­cruit this cycle, Rep. Tom Cot­ton.

It’s enough that even some of the group’s once-ar­dent crit­ics have come around to em­bra­cing it — even if the Club’s lead­er can barely be­lieve what he’s hear­ing.

“People call me once in a while and say, the es­tab­lish­ment folks, even the Mc­Con­nell folks, they say, ‘You guys are kind of the mod­el,’ ” said Chris Chocola, the Club’s pres­id­ent, in an in­ter­view at the group’s sixth-floor of­fice in down­town Wash­ing­ton. “So, get that in writ­ing. I’d love to get that in writ­ing.”

In truth, Chocola, a 52-year-old former con­gress­man from In­di­ana, ar­gues his group hasn’t changed at all since it began get­ting deeply in­volved in cam­paigns in the early 2000s. The Club has al­ways care­fully vet­ted and eval­u­ated pro­spect­ive en­dorsees closely, and held high stand­ards for find­ing Re­pub­lic­ans with a deep ap­pre­ci­ation of the per­ils of over-tax­a­tion and reg­u­la­tion. But even if the Club for Growth hasn’t changed, the world around it has.

By in­volving it­self in less-scru­tin­ized open House primar­ies, it has played a sem­in­al role in mov­ing the House Re­pub­lic­an caucus to the right over the years. But there’s a cost to the suc­cess: Al­though it re­mains the pree­m­in­ent con­ser­vat­ive out­side group, it has in­spired the pro­lif­er­a­tion of oth­er in­sur­gent or­gan­iz­a­tions just like it. And many of them — like the Sen­ate Con­ser­vat­ives Fund and Her­it­age Ac­tion Fund — have taken an even more ant­ag­on­ist­ic re­la­tion­ship to­ward the Re­pub­lic­an powers-that-be.

The res­ult is the Club now sits in the polit­ic­al cen­ter of the GOP in a way per­haps no oth­er con­ser­vat­ive group does — able to main­tain cred­ib­il­ity with both es­tab­lish­ment and act­iv­ist forces in the party. The ques­tion is, with those two sides al­ways at each oth­er’s throats, can it stay there for long?

“In com­par­is­on to groups like Sen­ate Con­ser­vat­ives Fund and the Madis­on Pro­ject, the Club has been the slightly more the grown-up in the room this cycle in terms of how they ap­proach races,” said Bri­an Walsh, a former NR­SC spokes­man who has been crit­ic­al of the or­gan­iz­a­tion.

Chocola of­fers an al­tern­ate and more-flat­ter­ing ex­plan­a­tion: His group’s track re­cord has simply won over many skep­tics. He points to the elec­tion of Marco Ru­bio, Mike Lee, and Pat Toomey — him­self the Club’s former pres­id­ent — as proof the group picks not only con­ser­vat­ive can­did­ates but can­did­ates who win gen­er­al elec­tions. He’s quick to point out the men and wo­men who nev­er re­ceived his im­prim­at­ur, like Christine O’Don­nell or Todd Akin, who not only lost but em­bar­rassed the GOP be­fore de­feat.

“When people start say­ing we’re ir­ra­tion­al, I say, ‘OK, so you’d rather have Ar­len Specter than Pat Toomey. You’d rather have Charlie Crist than Marco Ru­bio?’ ” he said. “So we have ex­amples of — really?”

To be sure, the Club still eli­cits eye-rolls from GOP polit­ic­al pro­fes­sion­als who re­gard it as a group with a big bark but lim­ited bite. Oth­ers, cit­ing the group’s op­pos­i­tion to vet­er­an Sen. Thad Co­chran of Mis­sis­sippi or Rep. Mike Simpson’s primary foes in Idaho, swear the group is as de­struct­ive to the GOP as it’s ever been. And in an hour-long in­ter­view, Chocola reg­u­larly mocked and lam­pooned the party com­mit­tees and seasoned op­er­at­ives he thinks have no idea how to build a sus­tain­able con­gres­sion­al ma­jor­ity. In­deed, the Club made a point of an­noun­cing it would be us­ing Jamestown As­so­ci­ates to pro­duce its ads this cycle. The group was black­lis­ted by Mc­Con­nell and the party com­mit­tees for aid­ing Mc­Con­nell’s Re­pub­lic­an primary rival, Matt Bev­in.

“I don’t think Mc­Con­nell or his folks have any ad­mir­a­tion for us at all,” Chocola said. “We’re just not in that race. It’s pretty black and white. If we were in the race, we would be just like [oth­er act­iv­ists]. We’re not in the race? We’re the ra­tion­al smart people.”

That char­ac­ter­iz­a­tion is hotly dis­puted by many party strategists, who point to 2010 as the year when the fal­lout in­tens­i­fied. That year, the Club backed Shar­ron Angle, who squandered a golden op­por­tun­ity to de­feat Sen­ate Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id. Re­pub­lic­an of­fi­cials, fa­mil­i­ar with her back­ground in the Nevada Le­gis­lature, had feared that she would be one of the few can­did­ates un­able to win the seat. Two years later, the Club’s en­dorse­ment of Mour­dock against Lugar and out­spoken op­pos­i­tion to former Wis­con­sin Gov. Tommy Thompson in the Wis­con­sin Sen­ate race cre­ated fresh wounds with Re­pub­lic­ans.

“When you’re spend­ing mil­lions of dol­lars against folks who are far more aligned with you than many Demo­crats are, it’s very frus­trat­ing,” Walsh said.

Chocola dis­misses those con­cerns. He said Mour­dock’s de­bate gaffe over abor­tion was en­tirely un­pre­dict­able for a can­did­ate with no his­tory of con­tro­versy. He ad­ded that he’s glad many of the people who com­plain about the Club sug­gest how power­ful they think the or­gan­iz­a­tion is.

“I’m not say­ing we’re smarter or any­thing, but we’re con­sist­ent. We’re just do­ing the same thing, and learn the les­sons of that. And so, should they be in the primar­ies or not in primar­ies? They don’t know. And we don’t care,” he said.

In fact, Chocola’s non­chal­ance con­trib­uted to the un­likely al­li­ance with the NR­SC in Arkan­sas and Alaska. He said the Club is simply look­ing for well-re­garded con­ser­vat­ives who can win elec­tions. And be­cause of the group’s work mov­ing the party right­ward, the com­mit­tee has con­cluded that can­did­ates who es­pouse the Club’s brand of con­ser­vat­ism are cap­able of win­ning pivotal statewide races.

“The fact that 11 people on the corner of 20th and L can out­man­euver, out-in­flu­ence, outdo the en­tire es­tab­lish­ment and all their al­lies “¦ that’s pretty im­press­ive, isn’t it?” Chocola said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
When It Comes to Mining Asteroids, Technology Is Only the First Problem
23 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Foreign Policy takes a look at the future of mining the estimated "100,000 near-Earth objects—including asteroids and comets—in the neighborhood of our planet. Some of these NEOs, as they’re called, are small. Others are substantial and potentially packed full of water and various important minerals, such as nickel, cobalt, and iron. One day, advocates believe, those objects will be tapped by variations on the equipment used in the coal mines of Kentucky or in the diamond mines of Africa. And for immense gain: According to industry experts, the contents of a single asteroid could be worth trillions of dollars." But the technology to get us there is only the first step. Experts say "a multinational body might emerge" to manage rights to NEOs, as well as a body of law, including an international court.

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Obama Reflects on His Economic Record
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Not to be outdone by Jeffrey Goldberg's recent piece in The Atlantic about President Obama's foreign policy, the New York Times Magazine checks in with a longread on the president's economic legacy. In it, Obama is cognizant that the economic reality--73 straight months of growth--isn't matched by public perceptions. Some of that, he says, is due to a constant drumbeat from the right that "that denies any progress." But he also accepts some blame himself. “I mean, the truth of the matter is that if we had been able to more effectively communicate all the steps we had taken to the swing voter,” he said, “then we might have maintained a majority in the House or the Senate.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Reagan Families, Allies Lash Out at Will Ferrell
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Ronald Reagan's children and political allies took to the media and Twitter this week to chide funnyman Will Ferrell for his plans to play a dementia-addled Reagan in his second term in a new comedy entitled Reagan. In an open letter, Reagan's daughter Patti Davis tells Ferrell, who's also a producer on the movie, “Perhaps for your comedy you would like to visit some dementia facilities. I have—I didn’t find anything comedic there, and my hope would be that if you’re a decent human being, you wouldn’t either.” Michael Reagan, the president's son, tweeted, "What an Outrag....Alzheimers is not joke...It kills..You should be ashamed all of you." And former Rep. Joe Walsh called it an example of "Hollywood taking a shot at conservatives again."

Source:
PEAK CONFIDENCE
Clinton No Longer Running Primary Ads
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

In a sign that she’s ready to put a longer-than-ex­pec­ted primary battle be­hind her, former Sec­ret­ary of State Hil­lary Clin­ton (D) is no longer go­ing on the air in up­com­ing primary states. “Team Clin­ton hasn’t spent a single cent in … Cali­for­nia, In­di­ana, Ken­tucky, Ore­gon and West Vir­gin­ia, while” Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) “cam­paign has spent a little more than $1 mil­lion in those same states.” Meanwhile, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Sanders’ "lone back­er in the Sen­ate, said the can­did­ate should end his pres­id­en­tial cam­paign if he’s los­ing to Hil­lary Clin­ton after the primary sea­son con­cludes in June, break­ing sharply with the can­did­ate who is vow­ing to take his in­sur­gent bid to the party con­ven­tion in Phil­adelphia.”

Source:
CITIZENS UNITED PT. 2?
Movie Based on ‘Clinton Cash’ to Debut at Cannes
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

The team behind the bestselling "Clinton Cash"—author Peter Schweizer and Breitbart's Stephen Bannon—is turning the book into a movie that will have its U.S. premiere just before the Democratic National Convention this summer. The film will get its global debut "next month in Cannes, France, during the Cannes Film Festival. (The movie is not a part of the festival, but will be shown at a screening arranged for distributors)." Bloomberg has a trailer up, pointing out that it's "less Ken Burns than Jerry Bruckheimer, featuring blood-drenched money, radical madrassas, and ominous footage of the Clintons."

Source:
×