How Bridgegate Is Helping Christie With Conservatives

Media scrutiny of the New Jersey governor is earning him some sympathy points.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie delivers his budget address for fiscal year 2015 to the Legislature, February 25, 2014 at the Statehouse in Trenton, New Jersey.
National Journal
Alex Roarty
See more stories about...
Alex Roarty
March 6, 2014, 1:14 p.m.

As New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie tries to over­come con­ser­vat­ive skep­ti­cism about his re­cord, he’s find­ing a new ally in con­vin­cing the base he’s not all that bad: the me­dia.

The rev­el­a­tion that Christie’s top aides im­prop­erly closed traffic lanes in an act of polit­ic­al re­tri­bu­tion has dam­aged his repu­ta­tion and led pun­dits to ques­tion his elect­ab­il­ity. But to many rock-ribbed Re­pub­lic­ans at the Con­ser­vat­ive Polit­ic­al Ac­tion Con­fer­ence on Thursday, the press’s with­er­ing scru­tiny of the gov­ernor’s role in “Bridgeg­ate” makes him a sym­path­et­ic fig­ure — just the latest in a long line of GOP lead­ers to bear the un­fair at­tacks of a biased me­dia.

The changed at­ti­tude was ap­par­ent at this week’s con­fer­ence, an event that only a year ago snubbed the blue-state Re­pub­lic­an over his chum­mi­ness with Pres­id­ent Obama and out­spoken cri­ti­cism of con­gres­sion­al Re­pub­lic­ans look­ing to tight­en spend­ing for Hur­ricane Sandy. This year, Christie spoke and de­livered a well-re­ceived speech that ended with a stand­ing ova­tion among the thou­sands who packed the room.

In in­ter­views, many CPAC at­tendees cau­tioned they’re still wary of Christie’s mod­er­a­tion on is­sues like gun con­trol and his past chummy re­la­tion­ship with Obama. Few named him their top 2016 choice. But sev­er­al at­tendees offered that Christie has an op­por­tun­ity to re­pair some of the dam­age done to his re­la­tion­ship with con­ser­vat­ives, thanks to the me­dia’s in­cess­ant fo­cus on the gov­ernor.

“The me­dia at­tacks on Christie have helped him with Re­pub­lic­ans and con­ser­vat­ives who were, to some de­gree, sus­pi­cious of him be­cause the me­dia liked him so much,” said Er­ick Er­ick­son, a prom­in­ent con­ser­vat­ive pun­dit.

“I think he won a lot of friends be­cause they can see that the es­tab­lish­ment lib­er­al me­dia were at­tack­ing him. That al­ways causes people to sit up and take no­tice,” ad­ded former U.N. Am­bas­sad­or John Bolton, a rumored pres­id­en­tial can­did­ate him­self.

Christie spoke about how Re­pub­lic­ans need to of­fer a more con­struct­ive mes­sage to win elec­tions, and avoided any ex­pli­cit ref­er­ences to Bridgeg­ate. But his fre­quent ad­mon­i­tions to­ward the me­dia sug­ges­ted it wasn’t far from his mind.

“We have to stop let­ting the me­dia define who we are and what we stand for,” said Christie, a theme he re­turned to sev­er­al times throughout the speech. “When we’re talk­ing about what we’re for … our ideas win.”

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4790) }}

Christie still would face fun­da­ment­al chal­lenges in a Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial nom­in­at­ing fight. An ABC News/Wash­ing­ton Post poll re­leased Thursday found nearly three in 10 Re­pub­lic­ans would not con­sider vot­ing for him for pres­id­ent. For com­par­is­on, only 20 per­cent of Re­pub­lic­ans said they wouldn’t con­sider fel­low prob­able White House hope­ful Marco Ru­bio, whose im­mig­ra­tion-re­form ef­forts have caused him his own trouble among con­ser­vat­ives.

The me­dia-en­abled re­set should help Christie, but con­ser­vat­ives cau­tion he still has a lot of work to do be­fore re­turn­ing to their good graces. Many at­tendees said the gov­ernor should view the cur­rent mo­ment as an op­por­tun­ity to ar­tic­u­late a vis­ion that con­ser­vat­ives can rally be­hind. In oth­er words, his re­prieve is only tem­por­ary.

“Ul­ti­mately, con­ser­vat­ives will vote on the basis of philo­sophy, so it’s up to him … to ex­plain why, philo­soph­ic­ally, con­ser­vat­ives should sup­port him,” Bolton said.

In in­ter­views with rank-and-file con­ser­vat­ives, most in­dic­ated that al­though they’re open to a Christie can­did­acy, he has a lot to prove to con­ser­vat­ives be­fore they sup­port him.

“He’s not a rock-ribbed con­ser­vat­ive, and every­one knows that,” said Bri­an Hamp­ton, a 70-year-old Re­pub­lic­an from Ar­ling­ton, Va.

Chris Adding­ton, a 56-year-old New Hamp­shire Re­pub­lic­an who at­ten­ded CPAC with his son, said he ques­tions Christie’s re­cord on gun con­trol. “In gen­er­al, you have con­ser­vat­ives who have con­cerns about him,” he said.

Oth­ers ac­know­ledged that al­though they were up­set with the me­dia’s cov­er­age of Christie, it hadn’t rad­ic­ally changed their think­ing about him. An­thony Fama of Mas­sachu­setts said that the me­dia’s bi­as “couldn’t be more ob­vi­ous,” adding that he felt “em­bar­rassed” for them. But the 49-year-old said sym­pathy for the gov­ernor won’t last. “I think it’s something that will be short-lived,” he said.

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
10 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
10 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
11 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×