Yulia Tymoshenko: Ukraine’s Savior or Foe?

The country’s former prime minister, dubbed “Putin with a braid,” has been released from prison, and she’s ready to join the opposition’s cause.

Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko delivers a speech in Kiev's Independence Square on Saturday, the day she was released from prison.
National Journal
Marina Koren
See more stories about...
Marina Koren
Feb. 25, 2014, midnight

The Ukrain­i­an pres­id­ent fled his palace out­side Kiev this week­end, and his where­abouts are un­known. On the same day he left, 300 miles west of the cap­it­al, his ar­chrival was re­leased from a pris­on hos­pit­al.

The tim­ing was no ac­ci­dent. The same op­pos­i­tion move­ment that drove Pres­id­ent Vikt­or Ya­nukovych out on Sat­urday led to a re­vi­sion of the coun­try’s crim­in­al code, set­ting former Prime Min­is­ter Yulia Ty­moshen­ko free after she served two and a half years for ab­use of power.

Ty­moshen­ko headed right to In­de­pend­ence Square, where pro-West­ern cit­izens and po­lice have been locked in deadly con­flict over the Ukrain­i­an gov­ern­ment’s strong al­le­gi­ance to Rus­sia and weak ties to the European Uni­on.

“After what you did, Ukraine is already yours,” Ty­moshen­ko, in a wheel­chair due to severe back pain, told the 50,000 people gathered there. She called them “her­oes.”

Then, she switched gears. “Start­ing today, I am get­ting back to work,” she said. “I will not a miss a mo­ment to make sure that you feel happy in your own land.”

Ty­moshen­ko’s teary-eyed speech in In­de­pend­ence Square soun­ded to many like a pre­lude to a pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, and ru­mors are already swirl­ing that she will run in the newly an­nounced elec­tions in May. Her sup­port­ers in the op­pos­i­tion are en­er­gized about build­ing her cam­paign. But mean­while, her spokes­wo­man tells The New York Times that “it’s not time for this.”

Ty­moshen­ko’s de­tract­ors couldn’t agree more.

Ty­moshen­ko, fam­ous for her bright, blond locks and trade­mark peas­ant braid, is a po­lar­iz­ing fig­ure in Ukraine, a politi­cian with au­thor­it­ari­an tend­en­cies who many say is just as cor­rupt and power-hungry as the rest of them. “Putin with a braid,” Ju­lia Ioffe writes in The New Re­pub­lic.

“You can’t stop her in any nor­mal polit­ic­al way,” Dmitry Vy­drin, who was Ty­moshen­ko’s close ad­viser for nearly a dec­ade, told Ioffe in a deeply re­por­ted 2010 story about the politi­cian. “You can’t beat her on TV, you can’t out-ar­gue her on the town square. If she had more bio­lo­gic­al time on earth, she’d be­come pres­id­ent of the Ukraine, pres­id­ent of the E.U., pres­id­ent of the U.S. The only thing that can stop her is Ty­moshen­ko her­self.”

Ty­moshen­ko, he said, be­lieves she is the re­in­carn­a­tion of Eva Per­ón, the former Ar­gen­tine first lady who used her beauty and cha­risma to climb the polit­ic­al so­cial lad­der. “She cop­ies her con­sciously and sub­con­sciously,” Vy­drin said.

Long be­fore she spoke in front of the op­pos­i­tion move­ment, Ty­moshen­ko was a bru­nette who spoke Rus­si­an rather than Ukrain­i­an and grew up poor. In the 1990s, she struck it rich in the coun­try’s no­tori­ously cor­rupt gas in­dustry, gar­ner­ing the nick­name “Gas Prin­cess.” She was once ar­res­ted after be­ing ac­cused of for­ging doc­u­ments for a gas deal, but the charges didn’t stick. (Pavlo Laz­ar­en­ko, her former busi­ness part­ner and one­time prime min­is­ter, was con­victed in the United States of money laun­der­ing, cor­rup­tion, and fraud with­in the gas sec­tor.)

Ty­moshen­ko was elec­ted to par­lia­ment in 1996, and then served as deputy prime min­is­ter for the fuel and en­ergy sec­tor un­der then-Pres­id­ent Vikt­or Yushchen­ko in 1999. After win­ning the Novem­ber 2004 elec­tion — a rigged race that was first called for Ya­nukovych and promp­ted wide­spread protests, known as the Or­ange Re­volu­tion — Yushchen­ko ap­poin­ted Ty­moshen­ko prime min­is­ter. The pair’s re­la­tion­ship quickly de­volved in­to bick­er­ing, and the pres­id­ent, jeal­ous of Ty­moshen­ko’s grow­ing pop­ular­ity, kicked her out of his ad­min­is­tra­tion and in­vited Ya­nukovych to re­place her.

The de­cision did not slow Ty­moshen­ko down, and she cam­paigned in the par­lia­ment. She formed her own party, lob­bied her par­lia­ment­ary en­emies for sup­port, and, two months later, after sev­er­al ne­go­ti­ations with the Ukrain­i­an gov­ern­ment, man­aged to win her prime min­is­ter’s spot back.

Then came the 2010 elec­tions. Ukraine was deep in a two-year-old eco­nom­ic re­ces­sion, and the spark of re­volu­tion had fizzled out. Its cit­izens, des­per­ate for im­prove­ment in their daily lives, voted in the now-ous­ted Ya­nukovych, a politi­cian whose own polit­ic­al past was marked by jail time. Ty­moshen­ko, one of his op­pon­ents in the race, and her party boy­cot­ted his in­aug­ur­a­tion. Once in of­fice, Ya­nukovych ex­ac­ted his re­venge. Ukraine’s pro­sec­utor’s of­fice tried and sen­tenced Ty­moshen­ko to sev­en years in pris­on for ab­use of power and em­bez­zle­ment for broker­ing a con­tro­ver­sial gas deal with Rus­sia.

In 2009, Rus­si­an Pres­id­ent Vladi­mir Putin said he felt “com­fort­able” work­ing with Ty­moshen­ko. But that was be­fore Ukraine came tee­ter­ing on the edge of civil war, threat­en­ing Putin’s hold over the former So­viet coun­try. Now, Ty­moshen­ko is stok­ing the blaze of a polit­ic­al re­volu­tion.

Wheth­er she’ll be the one feed­ing the fire in the long term re­mains to be seen. The crowd’s re­ac­tion to her Sat­urday ap­pear­ance in In­de­pend­ence Square was en­thu­si­ast­ic but sub­dued enough to sug­gest skep­ti­cism, es­pe­cially from the coun­try’s lib­er­als. The people won’t lunge to ac­cept her, but Ty­moshen­ko, a shrewd op­er­at­ive, likely knows that. The pres­id­ency is still far bey­ond her — or any­one’s — reach, but Ty­moshen­ko is back, and she looks ready to coax the em­bers back in­to a dy­ing flame.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4768) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
6 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
6 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
7 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×