This Take on Ukraine’s Yulia Tymoshenko Reads Like a Bad Parody of Misogyny

And says next to nothing about her politics.

National Journal
Lucia Graves
Feb. 25, 2014, 6:57 a.m.

Early Monday morn­ing Ed­ward Lu­cas, a seni­or ed­it­or at The Eco­nom­ist, tweeted out what he deemed to be his “scath­ing take on Yulia Ty­moshen­ko.”

I clicked ex­pect­ing to hear her policies ex­cor­i­ated. In­stead what I got was a lur­id ac­count of her “for­mid­able charm,” as well as the “im­macu­late blonde tresses and some­times kit­ten­ish ways” that have some­times led politi­cians in Ukraine to un­der­es­tim­ate her.

I came ex­pect­ing to learn more about her in­volve­ment in the coun­try’s no­tori­ously cor­rupt gas in­dustry and her role in the Or­ange Re­volu­tion. But sev­er­al hun­dred words in, all I had learned of her polit­ic­al ap­proach was that she’s “pre­pared to use her un­deni­able sexu­al mag­net­ism,” and that an an­onym­ous am­bas­sad­or once dubbed a two-hour ride he took with her in a lim­ousine “the most sexu­ally threat­en­ing ex­per­i­ence of his life.”

What ex­actly is meant by sexu­ally threat­en­ing? Well, Lu­cas men­tions that her “eyes, coquet­tish tosses of the head, and coo­ing tones are al­most hyp­not­ic.” But, he warns, she is also “cap­able of ex­plos­ive an­ger.” And adds, “I have seen her shriek and curse in ter­ri­fy­ing erup­tions of rage: the kit­ten turns in­to a tigress.”

Take­downs of power­ful wo­men that re­volve around petty com­ments about their looks or tem­pera­ment are fa­mil­i­ar to any­one who’s been pay­ing at­ten­tion to the head­lines. Some­times the re­marks are subtle. Sheryl Sand­berg writ­ing in Lean In told the story of how at her wed­ding her sib­lings joked about how de­mand­ing she was as a kid.

“Some of you think we’re Sheryl’s young­er sib­lings, but really we were Sheryl’s first em­ploy­ees — em­ploy­ee No. 1 and em­ploy­ee No. 2. Ini­tially, as a 1-year-old and a 3-year old, we were worth­less and weak. Dis­or­gan­ized, lazy. We would just as soon spit on ourselves as read the morn­ing pa­per. But Sheryl could see that we had po­ten­tial. For more than 10 years, Sheryl took us un­der her wing and whipped us in­to shape…. “

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4761) }}

To Sand­berg the hu­mor was tinged with a sort of linger­ing sex­ism, in which boys who take con­trol are deemed al­pha and girls who do are deemed bossy. (Re­search shows fe­male lead­ers have to be much more con­scious about what traits they cul­tiv­ate and which ones they sup­press.)

But the cov­er­age of Ty­moshen­ko goes farther: It’s dis­miss­ing her polit­ic­al sub­stance by de­mon­iz­ing her sexu­al­ity. Ty­moshen­ko has been called Vladi­mir ”Putin with a braid” for her hard­line polit­ics, and yet the treat­ment of their su­per­fi­ci­al­it­ies could scarcely be more dif­fer­ent.

Putin’s mach­ismo has been met with fawn­ing and ad­u­la­tion, as de­scribed by Mar­in Cogan in her piece “The Secret Amer­ic­an Sub­cul­ture of Putin Wor­ship­pers.” The fact that he rides horses in the foot­hills of Karata­sh and hunts shirt­less has, if any­thing, en­hanced his polit­ic­al repu­ta­tion around the world. (The worst rib­bing he gets for it is when out­lets like The New York­er and The Eco­nom­ist pho­toshop his head onto the body of Olympic skaters.)

Ty­moshen­ko, mean­while, is vil­i­fied for her sexu­al­ity and “an­gel­ic looks” con­stantly. “Don’t let her looks fool you,” a par­tic­u­larly dim lede from The Daily Beast reads. “The wo­man of the mo­ment in Ukraine, whose crown of braided golden hair is cal­cu­lated to evoke myth­ic­al memor­ies of rur­al strength, has al­ways been a bet­ter icon than a politi­cian.” The post’s au­thor, Chris­toph­er Dickey, goes on to refer to her as a “hard-bit­ten ice queen,” (this fri­gid­ity stands in ap­par­ent con­trast to Lu­cas’ por­tray­al of her as a sexu­ally dan­ger­ous tigress). It’s not just the me­dia. Even her Ukrain­i­an nick­name of “gas prin­cess” is ques­tion­able.

Still noth­ing I’ve read ap­proaches Lu­cas’s story from Monday in which the most sub­stant­ive polit­ic­al thing we learn about Ty­moshen­ko is that her “au­thor­it­ari­an ways and er­rat­ic policy-mak­ing won few friends.” What the au­thor really wants us to know is that “her blonde hair be­came le­gendary” and that she’s “prone to ir­ra­tion­al, of­ten self-ag­grand­iz­ing flights of fancy.” That, and ac­cord­ing to a former and likely spurned ad­viser, she thinks she is the re­in­carn­a­tion of Eva Per­on.

I will not at­tempt to as­sess here her role in Ukrain­i­an polit­ics (as has been done skill­fully here by my col­league Mar­ina Koren). I clicked on Lu­cas’s art­icle be­cause I wanted to learn about her polit­ics from this seni­or ed­it­or at The Eco­nom­ist and self-pro­claimed Rus­si­an ex­pert. I came away con­vinced what he needs is a lec­ture.

What We're Following See More »
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
1 days ago

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Maher Weighs in on Bernie, Trump and Palin
1 days ago

“We haven’t seen a true leftist since FDR, so many millions are coming out of the woodwork to vote for Bernie Sanders; he is the Occupy movement now come to life in the political arena.” So says Bill Maher in his Hollywood Reporter cover story (more a stream-of-consciousness riff than an essay, actually). Conservative states may never vote for a socialist in the general election, but “this stuff has never been on the table, and these voters have never been activated.” Maher saves most of his bile for Donald Trump and Sarah Palin, writing that by nominating Palin as vice president “John McCain is the one who opened the Book of the Dead and let the monsters out.” And Trump is picking up where Palin left off.