Bill O’Reilly Grills Obama on Health Care, Benghazi, IRS

In a heated pre-Super Bowl interview, the Fox News host pressed the president on a number of issues — and Obama pushed back.

Fox News host Bill O'Reilly.
National Journal
Marina Koren
See more stories about...
Marina Koren
Feb. 2, 2014, 1:23 p.m.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4700) }}

When Pres­id­ent Obama sat down with Bill O’Re­illy for an in­ter­view on the day of the Su­per Bowl three years ago, the Fox News host in­ter­rup­ted the pres­id­ent 48 times in 15 minutes, or about 3.2 times per minute. This year’s pregame chat was no dif­fer­ent.

The in­ter­view, filmed Sunday at the White House, fo­cused heav­ily on mis­haps or scan­dals sur­round­ing the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion. Again, the long­time host of The O’Re­illy Factor wasn’t shy about chal­len­ging the pres­id­ent. First up: the health care web­site rol­lout.

“Why didn’t you fire Se­beli­us, the sec­ret­ary in charge of this?” asked O’Re­illy, re­fer­ring to Kath­leen Se­beli­us, the head of the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices de­part­ment who last year told a con­gres­sion­al com­mit­tee to hold her re­spons­ible for the bungled launch of the web­site. “I mean, she had to know after all those years and all that money that it wasn’t go­ing to work.”

“You know, my main pri­or­ity right now is mak­ing sure that it de­liv­ers for the Amer­ic­an people,” Obama re­spon­ded. “You’re not go­ing to an­swer that?” O’Re­illy asked.

The pres­id­ent did not, so O’Re­illy pressed on: “I’m sure that the in­tent is noble, but I’m a tax­pay­er and I’m pay­ing Kath­leen Se­beli­us’s salary and she screwed up, and you’re not hold­ing her ac­count­able.”

“I prom­ise you that we hold every­body up and down the line ac­count­able,” Obama said.

“She’s still there,” O’Re­illy countered.

The verbal spar­ring con­tin­ued for the rest of the in­ter­view. Next up: Benghazi. Namely, former De­fense Sec­ret­ary Le­on Pan­etta’s role in alert­ing the pres­id­ent about the 2012 at­tack.

O’RE­ILLY: Did he tell you, Sec­ret­ary Pan­etta, that it was a ter­ror­ist at­tack?

OBAMA: You know, what he told me was that there was an at­tack on our com­pound.

O’RE­ILLY: He didn’t use the word “ter­ror”?

OBAMA: In the heat of the mo­ment, Bill, what folks are fo­cused on is what’s hap­pen­ing on the ground. Do we have eyes on it? How can we make sure our folks are safe?

O’RE­ILLY: But I just want to get this on the re­cord. Did he tell you it was a ter­ror at­tack?

OBAMA: Bill, and I’m an­swer­ing your ques­tion, what he said to me was, “We’ve got an at­tack on our com­pound.”

O’RE­ILLY: No ter­ror at­tack?

Later on:

O’RE­ILLY: Your de­tract­ors be­lieve that you did not tell the world that there was a ter­ror at­tack be­cause your cam­paign didn’t want that out. That’s what they be­lieve.

OBAMA: And they be­lieve it be­cause folks like you are telling them that.

Then, the scan­dal sur­round­ing the In­tern­al Rev­en­ue Ser­vice, which was found to have tar­geted polit­ic­al groups, spe­cific­ally con­ser­vat­ive or­gan­iz­a­tions, for closer scru­tiny in their ap­plic­a­tions for tax-ex­empt status.

There was no cor­rup­tion there, Obama told O’Re­illy. “But how do you know?” the host countered. “These kinds of things keep on re­sur­fa­cing in part be­cause you and your TV sta­tion will pro­mote them,” the pres­id­ent said.

O’Re­illy hit on is­sues that con­ser­vat­ive law­makers in Wash­ing­ton have loudly pressed in re­cent months, wheth­er through more con­gres­sion­al hear­ings or calls for in­vest­ig­a­tions. But the new year and a new con­gres­sion­al agenda has pushed them on the back-burn­er, if not in­to the past al­to­geth­er. Men­tions by con­ser­vat­ive Con­gress mem­bers on the floor of “Benghazi” and “IRS” spiked last fall, ac­cord­ing to Cap­it­ol Words, a pro­gram that tracks con­gres­sion­al re­cord tran­scripts. Since then, however, the fre­quency of re­mind­ers has plummeted. Con­ser­vat­ives have turned their at­ten­tion to oth­er burn­ing policy is­sues, such as in­come in­equal­ity and im­mig­ra­tion re­form.

In his in­ter­view, O’Re­illy wanted the pres­id­ent to ad­dress past is­sues rather than look ahead. But if the last few weeks of re­l­at­ively min­im­al par­tis­an bick­er­ing are any in­dic­a­tion, the talk-show host may be in the minor­ity.

What We're Following See More »
Clapper: ISIS Will Try to Attack U.S. This Year
1 days ago

“Leaders of the Islamic State are determined to strike targets in the United States this year,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told a congressional panel today. Clapper added that “al-Qaida, from which the Islamic State spun off, remains an enemy and the U.S. will continue to see cyber threats from China, Russia and North Korea, which also is ramping up its nuclear program.”

CBC PAC to Endorse Clinton This Morning
1 hours ago

The Congressional Black Caucus PAC will formally endorse Hillary Clinton this morning, and “nearly a dozen CBC colleagues will descend on” South Carolina next week in advance of that state’s important primary. Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC), the highest ranking black member of Congress, reversed his earlier position of neutrality, saying he’ll make a decision “later in the week.”