White Men Are Everywhere

White males dominate Sunday political talk shows. But the overrepresentation does not end there.

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich (R-GA) on 'Meet the Press' at NBC studios March 8, 2009 in Washington, DC.
National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Jan. 31, 2014, midnight

White dudes are all over your tele­vi­sion. Their faces stare up at you from news­pa­pers and homepages. They abound in U.S. polit­ics. They are le­gion.

And they’re def­in­itely on all of your Sunday morn­ing polit­ic­al talk shows. Ac­cord­ing to a new study from Me­dia Mat­ters, white men made up the ma­jor­ity of guests on every ma­jor Sunday show in 2013.

They made up 60 per­cent of guests on This Week, 67 per­cent on Face the Na­tion, 67 per­cent on Fox News Sunday, 62 per­cent on Meet the Press, and 54 per­cent on State of the Uni­on. On MS­N­BC’s two Sunday morn­ing shows, Up and Melissa Har­ris-Perry, white men wer­en’t a ma­jor­ity, but still a plur­al­ity of all guests (42 per­cent and 27 per­cent of guests, re­spect­ively).

That’s a lot of white guys, and it’s not at all rep­res­ent­at­ive of the over­all U.S. pop­u­la­tion, of which white men make up just 31 per­cent, ac­cord­ing to the most re­cent Census data. But this massive overrep­res­ent­a­tion isn’t just on TV. It’s the bed­rock of the U.S. polit­ic­al class.

Wo­men make up about half (50.8 per­cent) of the U.S. pop­u­la­tion, ac­cord­ing to the most re­cent census data, yet they com­prise just 18.5 per­cent of the vot­ing seats in the cur­rent Con­gress. That’s a total of 20 sen­at­ors, 79 vot­ing mem­bers of in the House, and three non­vot­ing del­eg­ates.

Minor­it­ies in the U.S. are also sig­ni­fic­antly un­der­rep­res­en­ted in polit­ics. Minor­it­ies make up about 37 per­cent of Amer­ica’s pop­u­la­tion, based on the most re­cent census data. Con­gress — sur­prise, sur­prise — isn’t nearly that di­verse. At the be­gin­ning of the 113th Con­gress, 15.5 per­cent of mem­bers were minor­it­ies (78 serving in the House and five in the Sen­ate).

This un­der­rep­res­ent­a­tion ex­ists in­side Amer­ica’s news­rooms, too. Ac­cord­ing to a sur­vey from the Amer­ic­an So­ci­ety of News Ed­it­ors, the per­cent­age of wo­men in news­rooms has barely budged in over a dec­ade, nev­er rising above 38 per­cent. Minor­it­ies, mean­while, have com­prised only between 12 and 13 per­cent of news­rooms in the last dec­ade.

So what’s hap­pen­ing here? A few years back, Jonath­an Chait, then of The New Re­pub­lic, at­temp­ted to tackle the ques­tion of fe­male scarcity in magazine mastheads in a let­ter to Jezebel. Here’s some of that let­ter, which is ab­so­lutely worth read­ing — and is much more nu­anced — in full:

My ex­plan­a­tion, which I can’t prove, is so­cial­iz­a­tion pre­dis­poses boys to be more in­ter­ested both in pro­du­cing and con­sum­ing opin­ion journ­al­ism. Con­fid­ence in one’s opin­ions and a will­ing­ness to en­gage in in­tel­lec­tu­al com­bat are dis­pro­por­tion­ately (though not, of course, ex­clus­ively) male traits. I’ve come across sev­er­al writers in my ca­reer who are good at writ­ing in the ar­gu­ment­at­ive style but lack con­fid­ence in their abil­ity. They are all fe­male.

I want to be clear that I am not de­fin­ing this as a non-prob­lem. It is a prob­lem. I have a young daugh­ter who, through my ad­mit­tedly biased eyes, has dis­played a curi­ous, mor­ally pas­sion­ate, and deeply ana­lyt­ic­al mind at a pre­co­cious age. I want her to grow up a fear­lessly opin­ion­ated wo­man. I would be very happy if she de­cides to enter opin­ion journ­al­ism. And I fear that some­where along the way she will re­ceive sig­nals that hold her back. That is the primary thing that I think needs to change.

This kind of so­cial­iz­a­tion is also a prob­lem for ra­cial minor­it­ies. And hav­ing a high con­fid­ence in your own opin­ion isn’t just an im­port­ant qual­ity for opin­ion journ­al­ists and pun­dits. It’s cru­cial for suc­cess­ful politi­cians, too. 

Vir­tu­ally every­one, every­where has giv­en their take on the pro­fes­sion­al fe­male con­fid­ence prob­lem since Face­book’s Sheryl Sand­berg pub­lished Lean In last year. The book ad­dressed the “im­poster syn­drome,” in which high-achiev­ing wo­men — and men, par­tic­u­larly from minor­ity groups — “can’t seem to shake the sense that it is only a mat­ter of time un­til they are found out for who they really are — im­post­ors with lim­ited skills or abil­it­ies.” Im­post­or­ism is a feel­ing that can be in­cred­ibly tough to over­come in polit­ic­al pun­ditry, or polit­ics prop­er. It’s hard to be a Thought Lead­er™ but still feel like an im­post­or.

It’s not just a lack of con­fid­ence among wo­men and minor­it­ies that helps keep them un­der­rep­res­en­ted in polit­ics. Men, stud­ies have shown, of­ten ex­hib­it more over­con­fid­ence and ar­rog­ance than wo­men — the kind of per­son­al­ity traits that make it easi­er to enter the polit­ic­al class, but may also make it easi­er to be a worse mem­ber of it.

You won’t be see­ing many of the im­post­ors on your tele­vi­sion. The most com­mon Sunday show guests in 2013 were journ­al­ists, pun­dits, and politi­cians. So it should not come as a sur­prise that the guests were pre­dom­in­antly white and male. They come from a white, male world.

Han­nah Groch-Begley, a re­search fel­low at Me­dia Mat­ters who wrote Thursday on gender di­versity on Sunday shows, doesn’t think this is an ex­cuse.

“We do ob­vi­ously have a sys­tem in which white men are clearly more rep­res­en­ted in polit­ics, more rep­res­en­ted in me­dia,” she says. But book­ers on the polit­ic­al talk shows could still be mak­ing dif­fer­ent choices. She points spe­cific­ally to MS­N­BC’s Up and Melissa Har­ris-Perry, which stand out for their di­verse roster of pan­el­ists. “They’re put­ting ef­fort in­to mak­ing sure their shows re­flect the di­versity of the Amer­ic­an pub­lic, which journ­al­ists are sup­posed to serve,” Groch-Begley says.

A solu­tion would re­quire a chain re­ac­tion. Fea­tur­ing more wo­men and minor­it­ies on talk shows means em­ploy­ing more wo­men and minor­it­ies in polit­ics, which means, at least in part, tack­ling so­cial­iz­a­tion ste­reo­types and out­comes. In oth­er words, we still have a ways to go un­til our Sunday morn­ing tele­vi­sion, and our polit­ics, look a little less white-washed and a little more Amer­ic­an.

Full dis­clos­ure: The au­thor is a white man. As a child, he was a white boy. As such, he has been af­forded the lux­ur­ies as­so­ci­ated with be­ing white and male over the course of his life. He also works in the pre­dom­in­antly white, pre­dom­in­antly male field of journ­al­ism. He does, however, suf­fer from fre­quent bouts of im­poster syn­drome.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4695) }}

What We're Following See More »
WITHER TRUMP?
Jon Stewart May Debut on HBO Before the Election
2 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"Jon Stewart could arrive on HBO in time for the November presidential election. In a Paley Media Council interview Thursday with CNN’s Brian Stelter, HBO CEO Richard Plepler was asked whether viewers could expect to see Stewart, former host of Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show,” on HBO before the general election. 'Yeah, I’m hopeful,' Plepler said."

Source:
ALL RIDERS TO BE AFFECTED
Metro to Begin Rolling Closures Next Month
5 hours ago
THE DETAILS

Beginning next month, Metro will begin a series of "about 15 separate large-scale work projects," each of which will close down stations and/or sections of track for up to weeks at a time. The entire initiative is expected to take about a year. The Washington Post has a list of the schedule of closures, and which lines and stations they'll affect.

Source:
ANOTHER MEETING WITH PRIEBUS
Trump to Meet with Ryan, Leadership Next Week
5 hours ago
THE LATEST

A day after saying he could not yet support Donald Trump's presidential bid, House Speaker Paul Ryan has invited the billionaire to a meeting in Washington next week with House leadership. Ryan and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus will also meet separately with Trump. 

Source:
‘EXACTING STANDARDS’
Obama on Trump: ‘This Is a Really Serious Job’
6 hours ago
THE DETAILS

"President Obama used the White House podium on Friday to dismiss Donald Trump as an unserious candidate to succeed him, and said leading the country isn't a job that's suited to reality show antics." At a briefing with reporters, the president said, "I just want to emphasize the degree to which we are in serious times and this is a really serious job. This is not entertainment. This is not a reality show. This is a contest for the presidency of the United States. And what that means is that every candidate, every nominee needs to be subject to exacting standards and genuine scrutiny."

Source:
MORE EXECUTIVE ORDERS
Panama Papers Spur White House to Crack Down on Evasion
8 hours ago
THE DETAILS

In the The White House on Thursday night unveiled a series of executive actions to combat money laundering—"among the most comprehensive response yet to the Panama Papers revelations." The president's orders will tighten transparency rules, close loopholes that allow "foreigners to hide financial activity behind anonymous entities in the U.S., and demand stricter “customer due diligence” rules for banks.

Source:
×