Will Nancy Pelosi Be the Next to Retire?

Her allies are stepping down, but the former speaker says she’ll run again in 2014.

WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 23: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) answers questions during a press conference October 23, 2013 in Washington, DC. Pelosi answered questions on the problems surrounding the website for the Affordable Care Act during her remarks. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
National Journal
Josh Kraushaar
Jan. 30, 2014, 6:58 a.m.

With Rep. Henry Wax­man’s re­tire­ment an­nounce­ment, many of House Minor­ity Lead­er Nancy Pelosi’s top lieu­ten­ants are abandon­ing ship. Wax­man joins his Cali­for­nia col­league, Rep. George Miller, and Rep. Jim Mor­an of Vir­gin­ia as close Pelosi al­lies to re­tire after this Con­gress. And after last year’s 2012 elec­tions, Pelosi’s lead­ing in-house strategist Jen Crider left her of­fice, later an­noun­cing she was work­ing for Mi­crosoft.

Their de­cisions are as strong a sig­nal as any that vet­er­an House Demo­crats hold little hope of tak­ing the House in 2014, and they prob­ably are pess­im­ist­ic about their long-term pro­spects for a con­gres­sion­al ma­jor­ity. Miller and Wax­man would be in line to chair in­flu­en­tial com­mit­tees if their party took con­trol of the cham­ber. A third Demo­crat, Rep. Col­lin Peterson of Min­nesota, wouldn’t com­mit to run­ning again in an in­ter­view this week. He would be in line to head up the Ag­ri­cul­ture Com­mit­tee in a Demo­crat­ic ma­jor­ity.

Demo­crats need to net 17 seats to hand Pelosi the gavel, and ana­lysts ex­pect little move­ment, with Pres­id­ent Obama’s low ap­prov­al rat­ings and re­dis­trict­ing re­du­cing the num­ber of com­pet­it­ive dis­tricts.

The de­cisions by Pelosi’s Cali­for­nia al­lies also raise the pro­spect that the minor­ity lead­er her­self could de­cide to re­tire — if not this year, then in the near fu­ture. (On pre­vi­ous oc­ca­sions, Pelosi has said she’s run­ning for a 14th term.) She’s played an act­ive role in help­ing her party fun­draise to take back the House, and she has shown no signs of slow­ing down. But Cali­for­nia’s fil­ing dead­line is more than a month away (March 7), giv­ing her time to change course. 

In a state­ment re­leased this af­ter­noon, Pelosi re­it­er­ated she is run­ning for an­oth­er term.

“I’m run­ning. I’ve already star­ted the pa­per­work pro­cess. My work is not fin­ished,” she said.

Wax­man and Miller’s re­tire­ments also un­der­score how out­sized a role Pelosi has played in her home state’s polit­ics, to her be­ne­fit in Con­gress, but also to the na­tion­al party’s det­ri­ment.

Be­fore the 2012 non­par­tis­an re­dis­trict­ing, most House seats in Cali­for­nia were ger­ry­mandered to the point where most mem­bers stayed in their seats in­def­in­itely. (Be­fore the last elec­tion, the av­er­age ten­ure among Cali­for­nia mem­bers of Con­gress in 2012 was just un­der 16 years.) Many of the more seni­or mem­bers de­veloped close ties with Pelosi, and sought to move up the con­gres­sion­al lead­er­ship chain in­stead of pur­su­ing statewide polit­ic­al of­fice.

In­deed, it’s strik­ing that the list of pro­spect­ive 2016 can­did­ates is filled with politicos from the oth­er Demo­crat­ic strong­hold of New York — Hil­lary Clin­ton, Gov. An­drew Cuomo, Sen. Kirsten Gil­librand — but there’s no one from Cali­for­nia on the list. Prom­ising Cali­for­nia Demo­crat­ic mem­bers of Con­gress, such as House Demo­crat­ic Caucus Chair­man Xavi­er Be­cerra, pre­ferred to move up the ranks than think big­ger.

That’s changed re­cently, thanks to a re­dis­trict­ing shake-up and Demo­crat­ic ef­forts to re­cruit young­er, more di­verse tal­ent to the state. The Demo­crat­ic Con­gres­sion­al Cam­paign Com­mit­tee made a con­cer­ted ef­fort in 2012 to re­cruit a di­verse crop of out­siders, bring­ing in new­comers such as emer­gency phys­i­cian Raul Ruiz and Mark Takano, the first openly gay per­son of col­or to hold a seat in Con­gress.

Cali­for­nia has changed dra­mat­ic­ally since Wax­man was first elec­ted in 1974 as part of a class of un­apo­lo­get­ic­ally lib­er­al Demo­crats. Pelosi re­flec­ted her del­eg­a­tion’s out­spoken lib­er­al­ism to a T. But as a new gen­er­a­tion of Demo­crats are get­ting elec­ted around her, she could very well be Cali­for­nia’s next mem­ber of Con­gress to step aside.

CLA­RI­FIC­A­TION: The story was up­dated to re­flect that Crider’s de­par­ture an­nounce­ment was made in Ju­ly, but ac­cord­ing to a Pelosi spokes­man, she stopped work­ing for the DCCC in Decem­ber 2012.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4695) }}

What We're Following See More »
STAFF PICKS
These (Supposed) Iowa and NH Escorts Tell All
2 hours ago
NATIONAL JOURNAL AFTER DARK

Before we get to the specifics of this exposé about escorts working the Iowa and New Hampshire primary crowds, let’s get three things out of the way: 1.) It’s from Cosmopolitan; 2.) most of the women quoted use fake (if colorful) names; and 3.) again, it’s from Cosmopolitan. That said, here’s what we learned:

  • Business was booming: one escort who says she typically gets two inquiries a weekend got 15 requests in the pre-primary weekend.
  • Their primary season clientele is a bit older than normal—”40s through mid-60s, compared with mostly twentysomething regulars” and “they’ve clearly done this before.”
  • They seemed more nervous than other clients, because “the stakes are higher when you’re working for a possible future president” but “all practiced impeccable manners.”
  • One escort “typically enjoy[s] the company of Democrats more, just because I feel like our views line up a lot more.”
Source:
STATE VS. FEDERAL
Restoring Some Sanity to Encryption
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

No matter where you stand on mandating companies to include a backdoor in encryption technologies, it doesn’t make sense to allow that decision to be made on a state level. “The problem with state-level legislation of this nature is that it manages to be both wildly impractical and entirely unenforceable,” writes Brian Barrett at Wired. There is a solution to this problem. “California Congressman Ted Lieu has introduced the ‘Ensuring National Constitutional Rights for Your Private Telecommunications Act of 2016,’ which we’ll call ENCRYPT. It’s a short, straightforward bill with a simple aim: to preempt states from attempting to implement their own anti-encryption policies at a state level.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
What the Current Crop of Candidates Could Learn from JFK
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

Much has been made of David Brooks’s recent New York Times column, in which confesses to missing already the civility and humanity of Barack Obama, compared to who might take his place. In NewYorker.com, Jeffrey Frank reminds us how critical such attributes are to foreign policy. “It’s hard to imagine Kennedy so casually referring to the leader of Russia as a gangster or a thug. For that matter, it’s hard to imagine any president comparing the Russian leader to Hitler [as] Hillary Clinton did at a private fund-raiser. … Kennedy, who always worried that miscalculation could lead to war, paid close attention to the language of diplomacy.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Hillary Is Running Against the Bill of 1992
2 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

The New Covenant. The Third Way. The Democratic Leadership Council style. Call it what you will, but whatever centrist triangulation Bill Clinton embraced in 1992, Hillary Clinton wants no part of it in 2016. Writing for Bloomberg, Sasha Issenberg and Margaret Talev explore how Hillary’s campaign has “diverged pointedly” from what made Bill so successful: “For Hillary to survive, Clintonism had to die.” Bill’s positions in 1992—from capital punishment to free trade—“represented a carefully calibrated diversion from the liberal orthodoxy of the previous decade.” But in New Hampshire, Hillary “worked to juggle nostalgia for past Clinton primary campaigns in the state with the fact that the Bill of 1992 or the Hillary of 2008 would likely be a marginal figure within today’s Democratic politics.”

Source:
STAFF PICKS
Trevor Noah Needs to Find His Voice. And Fast.
3 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

At first, “it was pleasant” to see Trevor Noah “smiling away and deeply dimpling in the Stewart seat, the seat that had lately grown gray hairs,” writes The Atlantic‘s James Parker in assessing the new host of the once-indispensable Daily Show. But where Jon Stewart was a heavyweight, Noah is “a very able lightweight, [who] needs time too. But he won’t get any. As a culture, we’re not about to nurture this talent, to give it room to grow. Our patience was exhausted long ago, by some other guy. We’re going to pass judgment and move on. There’s a reason Simon Cowell is so rich. Impress us today or get thee hence. So it comes to this: It’s now or never, Trevor.”

Source:
×