How Christie Could Hurt the GOP in 2016

If his scandal imperils his candidacy, it would leave the upscale wing of the Republican Party without an obvious choice.

TRENTON, NJ - JANUARY 9: New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie speaks about his knowledge of a traffic study that snarled traffic at the George Washington Bridge during a news conference on January 9, 2014 at the Statehouse in Trenton, New Jersey. According to reports Christie's Deputy Chief of Staff Bridget Anne Kelly is accused of giving a signal to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to close lanes on the George Washington Bridge, allegedly as punishment for the Fort Lee, New Jersey mayor not endorsing the Governor during the election. 
Getty Images
Ronald Brownstein
Jan. 23, 2014, 4 p.m.

It’s far too early to say wheth­er the con­tro­ver­sies swirl­ing around New Jer­sey Gov. Chris Christie will pre­vent him from ser­i­ously com­pet­ing for the 2016 Re­pub­lic­an pres­id­en­tial nom­in­a­tion.

But Christie’s cas­cad­ing dif­fi­culties un­der­score the short­age of good op­tions for voters and donors in the party’s up­scale ma­na­geri­al wing. It’s still a big if, but should the ac­cus­a­tions be­sieging Christie un­der­mine him as a 2016 con­tender, this wing of the GOP has few ob­vi­ous al­tern­at­ives. That di­lemma cap­tures a long-term shift in the Re­pub­lic­an Party’s cen­ter of grav­ity to­ward its tur­bu­lent pop­u­list wing — whose con­front­a­tion­al cham­pi­ons (such as Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas) of­ten fright­en swing voters as much as they in­spire act­iv­ists.

As the 2012 pres­id­en­tial primar­ies demon­strated, the Re­pub­lic­an elect­or­al co­ali­tion now di­vides about evenly between a gen­er­ally af­flu­ent, col­lege-edu­cated, and of­ten sec­u­lar “ma­na­geri­al” wing and a “pop­u­list” wing com­posed largely of blue-col­lar whites and evan­gel­ic­al Chris­ti­ans.

These two groups don’t dif­fer much on policy, but they di­verge on style, em­phas­is, and pri­or­ity. The man­agers usu­ally fo­cus more on eco­nom­ic than so­cial is­sues, and they prefer can­did­ates who em­body com­pet­ence rather than rage. Pop­u­lists grav­it­ate to­ward cul­tur­ally con­ser­vat­ive war­ri­ors who prom­ise not so much to re­form or even re­dir­ect Wash­ing­ton as to raze it.

Mitt Rom­ney was the ma­na­geri­al bloc’s clear fa­vor­ite in 2012; the party’s pop­u­list side au­di­tioned an ec­cent­ric ar­ray of op­tions (from Rick Perry to Her­man Cain) be­fore mostly set­tling on Rick San­tor­um. This di­vi­sion defined the GOP primary race: Rom­ney usu­ally won col­lege-edu­cated and af­flu­ent voters, while San­tor­um typ­ic­ally ran best among work­ing-class and evan­gel­ic­al Re­pub­lic­ans. Over­all, evan­gel­ic­als made up just over half of all 2012 primary voters and gave Rom­ney less than one-third of their votes. He nev­er­the­less won the race by amass­ing a crush­ing 30-point lead over both San­tor­um and Newt Gin­grich among the re­main­ing primary voters who did not identi­fy as evan­gel­ic­als, ac­cord­ing to a cu­mu­lat­ive ana­lys­is by ABC’s Gary Langer.

If Christie ran in 2016, he might not de­pend solely on the man­agers. Mike Murphy, the vet­er­an GOP con­sult­ant, says Christie’s com­bin­a­tion of bi­par­tis­an deal-mak­ing and gruff voice-from-the-bleach­ers per­sona could al­low him to bridge the up­scale/down­scale di­vide bet­ter than Rom­ney did. Christie’s op­por­tun­ity, Murphy says, is that “he would get the coun­try club on prag­mat­ism and he might get blue-col­lar work­ing white voters on style.”

Oth­er Re­pub­lic­ans are du­bi­ous that a blue-state gov­ernor who praised Pres­id­ent Obama in 2012 and signed off on in-state tu­ition for the chil­dren of im­mig­rants here il­leg­ally will find much trac­tion in the over­lap­ping circles of blue-col­lar, evan­gel­ic­al, and tea-party Re­pub­lic­ans. “Christie even now would have a prob­lem as a fu­sion can­did­ate,” says Re­pub­lic­an poll­ster Whit Ayres, who ad­vises Sen. Marco Ru­bio of Flor­ida, an­oth­er po­ten­tial 2016 con­tender. “[Christie] does not have a lot of fans among the more con­ser­vat­ive part.”

Wheth­er Murphy or Ayres is right about the breadth of Christie’s po­ten­tial ap­peal, few doubt that his co­ali­tion in any 2016 primary bid would tilt more to­ward up­scale than down­scale voters. Which means that if Christie can’t (or won’t) run, his ab­sence would leave a big­ger void on that side of the GOP di­vide.

So far, most Re­pub­lic­an strategists cau­tiously be­lieve Christie can weath­er the al­leg­a­tions over the George Wash­ing­ton Bridge lane clos­ures and the charge from Hoboken May­or Dawn Zi­m­mer that his ad­min­is­tra­tion linked su­per­storm re­lief funds to ap­prov­al of a polit­ic­ally con­nec­ted de­vel­op­ment pro­ject. “It’s a very com­bat­ive cul­ture there,” says Murphy, who has con­sul­ted for oth­er GOP can­did­ates in the state. “If he’s [just] found guilty of be­ing from New Jer­sey, that won’t hurt him at all.” But with polls this week already show­ing dents in Christie’s im­age, and mul­tiple in­vest­ig­a­tions present­ing the risk of fur­ther rev­el­a­tions, his re­cov­ery is not guar­an­teed.

What is cer­tain is that if Christie can’t run, or is severely weakened, the ma­na­geri­al wing that has usu­ally picked the party’s nom­in­ee may find it­self without a true horse. Former Flor­ida Gov. Jeb Bush would be the most com­fort­able fall­back, but he’s dis­played no en­thu­si­asm for run­ning. Three oth­er Mid­west­ern gov­ernors — Wis­con­sin’s Scott Walk­er, Ohio’s John Kasich, and Michigan’s Rick Snyder — would at­tract no­tice, but none yet has shown quite the grav­itas or pol­ish these voters prefer. Ru­bio and Rep. Paul Ry­an of Wis­con­sin would also find ma­na­geri­al sup­port­ers, but neither seems likely to con­sol­id­ate this fac­tion as Christie might.

This po­ten­tial va­cu­um, notes John Weaver, the chief strategist for John Mc­Cain in 2008, is emer­ging even as the prag­mat­ic, white-col­lar wing is los­ing in­flu­ence and “we see an as­cend­ency of the pop­u­list, liber­tari­an, na­tion­al­ist­ic wing, which is prob­ably a little stronger than it has ever been in the mod­ern era.” Without a strong ma­na­geri­al can­did­ate as bal­last, Weaver wor­ries that likely pop­u­list con­tenders such as Cruz and Sen. Rand Paul of Ken­tucky could drag the 2016 field in­to a con­ser­vat­ive bid­ding war “that would put the party at great risk in the gen­er­al elec­tion.” Christie’s am­bi­tions might not be the only cas­u­alty if some wrong turns on eth­ics cap­size his po­ten­tial can­did­acy (to bor­row from his own mu­sic­al idol, Bruce Spring- steen) some­where in the swamps of Jer­sey.

{{ BIZOBJ (video: 4653) }}

What We're Following See More »
THE 1%
Sanders’s Appeals to Minorities Still Filtered Through Wall Street Talk
57 minutes ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s all about the 1% and Wall Street versus everyone else for Bernie Sanders—even when he’s talking about race relations. Like Hillary Clinton, he needs to appeal to African-American and Hispanic voters in coming states, but he insists on doing so through his lens of class warfare. When he got a question from the moderators about the plight of black America, he noted that during the great recession, African Americans “lost half their wealth,” and “instead of tax breaks for billionaires,” a Sanders presidency would deliver jobs for kids. On the very next question, he downplayed the role of race in inequality, saying, “It’s a racial issue, but it’s also a general economic issue.”

DIRECT APPEAL TO MINORITIES, WOMEN
Clinton Already Pivoting Her Messaging
1 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

It’s been said in just about every news story since New Hampshire: the primaries are headed to states where Hillary Clinton will do well among minority voters. Leaving nothing to chance, she underscored that point in her opening statement in the Milwaukee debate tonight, saying more needs to be done to help “African Americans who face discrimination in the job market” and immigrant families. She also made an explicit reference to “equal pay for women’s work.” Those boxes she’s checking are no coincidence: if she wins women, blacks and Hispanics, she wins the nomination.

THE QUESTION
How Many Jobs Would Be Lost Under Bernie Sanders’s Single-Payer System?
9 hours ago
THE ANSWER

More than 11 million, according to Manhattan Institute fellow Yevgeniy Feyman, writing in RealClearPolicy.

Source:
WEEKEND DATA DUMP
State to Release 550 More Clinton Emails on Saturday
9 hours ago
THE LATEST

Under pressure from a judge, the State Department will release about 550 of Hillary Clinton’s emails—“roughly 14 percent of the 3,700 remaining Clinton emails—on Saturday, in the middle of the Presidents Day holiday weekend.” All of the emails were supposed to have been released last month. Related: State subpoenaed the Clinton Foundation last year, which brings the total number of current Clinton investigations to four, says the Daily Caller.

Source:
LATER TO THIS YEAR’S NADER
Jim Webb Rules Out Independent Bid
9 hours ago
WHY WE CARE

UPDATED: Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) will not be playing the role of Ralph Nader in this year’s election. Speaking in Dallas today, Webb said, “We looked at the possibility of an independent candidacy. Theoretically, it could be done, but it is enormously costly and time sensitive, and I don’t see the fundraising trajectory where we could make a realistic run.”

Source:
×